AMD Ryzen 5 7500F vs Intel Core i7-11850H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Core i7-11850H occupy the same performance tier, with average benchmark scores of 24964 and 24935 respectively, a mere 0.1% difference. However, the data reveals a lopsided head-to-head record: the Ryzen 5 7500F wins all 19 shared benchmark comparisons, despite the Intel chip holding a 2-core and 4-thread advantage. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s victory is not narrow; it leads by double-digit percentages in most tests, including a 36.7% margin in Cinebench R23 multi-core (22799 vs 16673) and a 54.5% gap in Geekbench multi-core (12362 vs 8002). The Intel Core i7-11850H, a mobile processor from 2021, cannot match the newer desktop chip’s per-core efficiency or memory bandwidth, making the AMD part the definitive choice for raw compute workloads in this matchup.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24964 on average, while the Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935. The difference is 0.1% in favor of the AMD part.

Q: How many benchmark tests does each processor win in the head-to-head comparison?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F wins 19 tests, and the Intel Core i7-11850H wins 0 tests. Every shared benchmark in the data favors the AMD chip.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two in any single benchmark?

A: The largest delta is in PassMark find prime numbers, where the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F scores 199 versus the Intel’s 87, a 128.7% advantage for AMD.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-11850H includes UHD Graphics 750, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has no integrated graphics listed in its specifications.

Q: What are the socket requirements for each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core i7-11850H uses Intel BGA 1787. They are not interchangeable.

Q: Which chip supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F supports ECC memory (true), whereas the Intel Core i7-11850H does not (false).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing generations. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It packs 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core i7-11850H uses the Tiger Lake architecture (Tiger Lake-H codename), built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It offers 8 cores and 16 threads, with a lower base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The transistor counts differ starkly: the AMD chip contains 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, while the Intel chip has a larger 190 mm² die with no transistor count listed.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The Ryzen 5 7500F has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i7-11850H has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a smaller 24 MB of shared L3. Memory support is another major split: the AMD part uses DDR5 with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the Intel part uses DDR4 with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. PCIe connectivity also differs, with the AMD chip offering Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only) versus the Intel chip’s Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

The market positioning is clear from the specs. The Ryzen 5 7500F is a desktop part with an unlocked multiplier, released on 2023-07-21. The Core i7-11850H is a mobile processor with a locked multiplier, released on 2021-05-10. The AMD chip draws 65 W TDP, while the Intel chip is rated at 35 W TDP, reflecting its laptop-oriented design. The Intel part includes UHD Graphics 750 integrated graphics, a feature absent from the AMD chip.

The Verdict

The data points to a single conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is the superior performer in every measured category. It wins all 19 head-to-head benchmarks, with margins ranging from 9.9% in PassMark integer math (79108 vs 71996) to a massive 128.7% in PassMark find prime numbers (199 vs 87). The Intel Core i7-11850H’s extra two cores and four threads do not translate into a single victory, as the AMD chip’s higher clock speeds and newer architecture more than compensate.

For desktop users building a new system, the Ryzen 5 7500F is the clear choice. It offers DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The Intel part, being a mobile BGA chip, is not suited for desktop builds, and its DDR4 memory limitation caps its memory bandwidth at 51.2 GB/s. The Intel chip’s only advantages are its integrated graphics and lower 35 W TDP, which matter only in laptop scenarios where the Ryzen 5 7500F cannot be installed.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i7-11850H has 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds favor AMD: the Ryzen 5 7500F runs at 3.70 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost, versus the Intel’s 2.10 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. TDP ratings are 65 W for AMD and 35 W for Intel. Socket types are incompatible: AMD Socket AM5 versus Intel BGA 1787.

Cache and memory configurations also diverge. The AMD chip has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 for AMD and DDR4 for Intel, with bandwidths of 83.2 GB/s and 51.2 GB/s respectively. ECC memory support is present on AMD (true) and absent on Intel (false). PCIe versions are Gen 5 with 24 lanes (AMD) versus Gen 4 with 20 lanes (Intel). The Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 750, while the AMD chip has no integrated graphics. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel part is locked. Release dates are 2023-07-21 for AMD and 2021-05-10 for Intel. The production process is 5 nm (TSMC) for AMD and 10 nm (Intel) for the rival.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results paint a consistent picture of AMD dominance. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 22799 against the Intel’s 16673, a 36.7% lead. Single-core results are similarly lopsided: Cinebench R23 single-core shows 3218 vs 2353, a 36.8% advantage. Geekbench multi-core delivers the largest percentage gap in the main suites, with the AMD chip scoring 12362 versus 8002, a 54.5% difference. Geekbench single-core also favors AMD at 2374 vs 1703, a 39.4% margin.

PassMark tests reveal where the architectures diverge most. The find prime numbers test shows the biggest overall delta, with AMD scoring 199 versus Intel’s 87, a 128.7% advantage. PassMark physics follows with 1788 vs 954, an 87.4% lead. Data encryption shows a 43.4% gap (17510 vs 12214), and extended instructions show 44.3% (22776 vs 15788). Smaller but still decisive wins include floating point math at 10.9% (47176 vs 42540) and integer math at 9.9% (79108 vs 71996). Multithread performance favors AMD by 33.7% (26825 vs 20059), while single-thread performance is 25.2% better (3841 vs 3069). Data compression and random string sorting also go to AMD, with 29.1% and 27.5% leads respectively.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F wins every benchmark category in the dataset, making its use-case dominance absolute. It is the better choice for multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, as shown by its 36.7% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core. It also excels at single-threaded tasks, with a 36.8% advantage in Cinebench R15 single-core. Memory-intensive applications benefit from the AMD chip’s 83.2 GB/s DDR5 bandwidth, which is 62.5% higher than the Intel’s 51.2 GB/s. Encryption and compression tasks favor AMD by 43.4% and 29.1% respectively, indicating stronger cryptographic and archival performance.

The Intel Core i7-11850H’s victories are not in performance but in platform attributes. It includes UHD Graphics 750, which the AMD chip lacks, making it the only option for systems requiring integrated display output without a discrete GPU. Its 35 W TDP is lower than the AMD’s 65 W, which suits thin-and-light laptops where power draw is a constraint. The Intel chip also uses DDR4 memory, which may be cheaper or more readily available in existing laptop designs. However, in raw computing power, the Intel part has no benchmark win to claim, and its 8-core configuration fails to overcome the AMD chip’s architectural efficiency and clock speed superiority.