AMD Ryzen 5 7500F vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H and AMD Ryzen 5 7500F are two very different processors: one is a mobile chip built for laptops, the other a desktop part aimed at mainstream builds. The data shows a clear split, with the Ryzen 5 7500F taking the majority of benchmark wins (17 of 23 head-to-head tests) while the Ryzen 7 6800H counters in a handful of specific workloads. While both processors land at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, their average benchmark scores are nearly identical (25201 for the 6800H versus 24964 for the 7500F), making the comparison less about overall strength and more about architectural priorities.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive victory for the Ryzen 5 7500F comes in multi-threaded rendering. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the 7500F scores 22799 against the 6800H’s 13094, a massive 42.6% lead. That gap is even larger in single-core performance, where the 7500F’s Cinebench R23 score of 3218 beats the 6800H’s 1542 by 52.1%. These aren’t marginal differences; the 7500F effectively doubles the 6800H’s single-thread performance in this test. The pattern repeats in Geekbench, where the 7500F leads by 22% in multicore (12362 vs 9642) and by 25.8% in single-core (2374 vs 1761).

The 7500F’s dominance extends to physical simulation and integer work. In PassMark physics, the 7500F scores 1788 versus 1046 for the 6800H, a 41.5% advantage. The prime number test is even more lopsided: the 7500F scores 199 while the 6800H manages just 57, a 71.4% deficit. These results point to a fundamental per-core strength advantage for the 7500F, which carries over into mixed workloads. The 7500F also wins PassMark multithread (26825 vs 23060, +14%) and random string sorting (36191 vs 30668, +15.3%), showing that its higher core efficiency often outweighs the 6800H’s two extra cores.

The Ryzen 7 6800H does secure six wins, but they are narrower and more specialized. Its largest margin comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 85397 against 79108, a 7.9% lead. It also wins PassMark data encryption (18260 vs 17510, +4.3%) and floating-point math (47989 vs 47176, +1.7%). In 3DMark threaded tests, the 6800H edges out the 7500F by 2.9% in the 16-thread test (6560 vs 6376) and by 2.4% in the max-thread test (6532 vs 6379). The 8-thread test is nearly a tie, with the 6800H winning by just 0.4% (5392 vs 5372). These wins suggest the 6800H’s additional cores provide a modest advantage when all threads are active, but that advantage shrinks to almost nothing in many cases.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7500F is the clear choice for single-threaded and lightly-threaded applications. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 974 beats the 6800H’s 872 by 10.5%, and its 2-thread score (1902 vs 1695) represents a 10.9% lead. The 4-thread test shows an 11.2% advantage (3621 vs 3214). For everyday responsiveness, web browsing, and older games that rely on high clock speeds, the 7500F’s architecture delivers markedly better results. The data also shows it excels in content creation: Cinebench R15 multicore (2298 vs 2136, +7%) and single-core (324 vs 242.5, +25.2%) both favor the 7500F, as does extended instruction throughput (PassMark extended instructions: 22776 vs 20114, +11.7%).

The Ryzen 7 6800H’s wins are concentrated in specific arithmetic and cryptographic workloads. PassMark integer math, data encryption, and floating-point math all favor the 6800H, with margins ranging from 1.7% to 7.9%. These are tasks that often benefit from having more physical cores available, even if each individual core is slower. The 6800H also holds a slight edge in 3DMark’s 16-thread and max-thread tests, suggesting that in heavily parallel synthetic gaming benchmarks, the extra two cores can tip the balance. However, the 6800H’s wins are rarely by large margins, and they come in fewer categories. The 7500F’s victories are often decisive, especially in Cinebench and physics tests, making it the more versatile performer for most users.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and target different platforms. The Ryzen 7 6800H uses the Zen 3+ architecture (codename Rembrandt) built on a 6 nm process from TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the newer Zen 4 architecture (codename Raphael) on a 5 nm process, also from TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, but clocks much higher: 3.70 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. This clock advantage, combined with the architectural IPC improvements of Zen 4, explains the 7500F’s dominance in single-threaded tests.

Cache configuration differs significantly. The 6800H has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The 7500F doubles the L2 to 1 MB per core and doubles the shared L3 to 32 MB. This larger cache helps the 7500F in workloads that reuse data, such as compression (PassMark data compression: 305925 vs 293929, +3.9%) and sorting. The 7500F also uses a different socket (AM5 vs FP7), supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes versus the 6800H’s Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and has a higher memory bandwidth rating of 83.2 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. Notably, the 7500F supports ECC memory while the 6800H does not.

The 6800H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the 7500F has none. This makes the 6800H a more complete package for laptops where a discrete GPU might not always be present. The 7500F is a desktop processor with an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, whereas the 6800H is locked. The transistor count and die size also differ dramatically: the 7500F has 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, while the 6800H’s die size is 208 mm² (transistor count not listed). The 6800H is rated at 45W TDP, while the 7500F runs at 65W, reflecting the mobile versus desktop design goals.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-threaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F wins every single-threaded test by a wide margin. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218 is 52.1% higher than the 6800H’s 1542. In 3DMark single-thread, it leads 974 vs 872 (10.5%), and in PassMark single-thread it scores 3841 vs 3212 (16.4%).

Q: How does the multi-core performance compare?

A: The 7500F leads in most multi-core tests despite having fewer cores. Cinebench R23 multicore shows a 42.6% advantage for the 7500F (22799 vs 13094), and Geekbench multicore favors it by 22% (12362 vs 9642). The 6800H wins 3DMark 16-thread by 2.9% and max-thread by 2.4%, but these are the exceptions.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 6800H have any advantages?

A: Yes, in specific arithmetic workloads. It wins PassMark integer math by 7.9% (85397 vs 79108), data encryption by 4.3% (18260 vs 17510), and floating-point math by 1.7% (47989 vs 47176). It also includes integrated Radeon 680M graphics, which the 7500F lacks.

Q: What is the difference in cache size?

A: The 7500F has 1 MB of L2 per core and 32 MB of shared L3, while the 6800H has 512 KB of L2 per core and 16 MB of shared L3. Both have 64 KB of L1 per core. The 7500F’s larger cache contributes to its higher scores in compression and sorting tests.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F supports ECC memory. The Ryzen 7 6800H does not list ECC support in its specifications.

Q: How do their memory bandwidth ratings compare?

A: The 7500F has a higher memory bandwidth rating at 83.2 GB/s, while the 6800H is rated at 76.8 GB/s. Both support DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 6800H | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 45W | 65W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | AMD Socket AM5 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen 4 |

| Codename | Rembrandt | Raphael |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | Not listed | 6,570 million |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 71 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 24 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Release Date | Not listed | 2023-07-21 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $179 |