AMD Ryzen 5 7500F vs AMD Ryzen 7 5825U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F wins every single head-to-head comparison against the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, taking all 17 recorded tests. The largest margin comes in PassMark's find prime numbers test, where the 7500F scores 199 versus just 48 for the 5825U, a 75.9% advantage. This is a processor built for raw compute density, and the numbers reflect that decisively.

Multi-core workloads show the most dramatic separation. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 7500F scores 22,799 against the 5825U's 10,152, a 55.5% lead. The Geekbench multi-core test tells a similar story: 12,362 versus 7,288, a 41% gap. Even the less demanding Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows a 23.5% edge for the 7500F, with scores of 2,298 and 1,757 respectively. The 7500F's higher core clocks and newer architecture simply overwhelm the 5825U's extra two cores and four threads.

Single-core performance also favors the 7500F, though the margins are somewhat smaller. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the 7500F posts 3,218 against 1,452, a 54.9% advantage. Geekbench single-core shows 2,374 versus 1,618, a 31.8% lead, while PassMark single-thread scores 3,841 against 3,053, a 20.5% gap. The 7500F's 5.00 GHz boost clock, compared to the 5825U's 4.50 GHz, is a clear factor here.

PassMark's specialized workloads reinforce the pattern. Data compression favors the 7500F by 27.5% (305,925 versus 221,938), extended instructions by 36.8% (22,776 versus 14,394), and random string sorting by 35% (36,191 versus 23,539). The 7500F also leads in floating-point math by 18.4% (47,176 versus 38,482) and integer math by 8.3% (79,108 versus 72,577). The smallest margin in the entire dataset is integer math, yet even there the 7500F remains ahead.

The physics test is another standout: the 7500F scores 1,788 versus 774, a 56.7% lead. Data encryption shows a 19.5% edge for the 7500F (17,510 versus 14,088), and PassMark multi-thread scores 26,825 versus 18,131, a 32.4% difference. Across every category, the 7500F's execution is faster, often by substantial margins.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and target different market segments. The Ryzen 7 5825U is a mobile part from the 5000 series, built on Zen 3 architecture with the codename Barcelo. It uses TSMC's 7 nm process node and packs 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Ryzen 5 7500F is a desktop chip from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture with the codename Raphael. It uses TSMC's 5 nm node, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The smaller and denser 5 nm process is a major contributor to the 7500F's performance advantage.

Core and thread counts differ as well. The 5825U offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the 7500F has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the 7500F wins all multi-threaded tests, which speaks to the efficiency of its newer architecture and much higher clock speeds. The 5825U runs at a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the 7500F runs at 3.70 GHz base and boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core, but the 7500F doubles the L2 cache to 1 MB per core versus 512 KB per core on the 5825U. L3 cache jumps from 16 MB shared on the 5825U to 32 MB shared on the 7500F. This doubling of L2 and L3 capacity gives the 7500F a significant edge in data-heavy workloads.

Memory support is another generational split. The 5825U uses DDR4 memory with dual-channel support and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The 7500F uses DDR5 with dual-channel support and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs: the 5825U offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the 7500F offers Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only).

The 5825U includes integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics, while the 7500F has no integrated graphics at all. The 5825U is a 15 W part for mobile systems, whereas the 7500F is a 65 W desktop processor. The 5825U uses AMD Socket FP6, and the 7500F uses AMD Socket AM5. The multiplier is locked on the 5825U but unlocked on the 7500F, allowing overclocking on the latter.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F wins every multi-core test. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 22,799 versus 10,152 for the Ryzen 7 5825U, a 55.5% lead. Geekbench multi-core shows 12,362 versus 7,288, a 41% advantage.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 5825U win any benchmark at all?

A: No. The recorded data shows zero wins for the 5825U across all 17 head-to-head benchmark tests. The Ryzen 5 7500F wins every single comparison.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Ryzen 7 5825U has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7500F has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the 7500F is faster in all multi-threaded benchmarks due to its higher clocks and newer architecture.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The Ryzen 7 5825U supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel operation and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Ryzen 5 7500F supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel operation and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory.

Q: Do either of these chips have integrated graphics?

A: The Ryzen 7 5825U includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics. The Ryzen 5 7500F has no integrated graphics, so it requires a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F leads in all single-core tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 3,218 versus 1,452, a 54.9% advantage. PassMark single-thread shows 3,841 versus 3,053, a 20.5% lead.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification category. The Ryzen 7 5825U belongs to the 5000 series with a Zen 3 architecture, while the Ryzen 5 7500F belongs to the 7000 series with a Zen 4 architecture. The 5825U uses a 7 nm process node, and the 7500F uses a 5 nm node. Transistor counts differ at 10,700 million versus 6,570 million, and die sizes at 180 mm² versus 71 mm².

Core counts stand at 8 versus 6, with threads at 16 versus 12. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz versus 3.70 GHz, and boost clocks are 4.50 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. TDP ratings are 15 W versus 65 W. The 5825U uses AMD Socket FP6, while the 7500F uses AMD Socket AM5.

Cache configurations differ in L2 and L3. Both have 64 KB of L1 per core, but L2 is 512 KB per core on the 5825U versus 1 MB per core on the 7500F. L3 is 16 MB shared versus 32 MB shared. Memory support changes from DDR4 to DDR5, with bandwidth increasing from 51.2 GB/s to 83.2 GB/s. PCIe generation moves from Gen 3 with 16 lanes to Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

The 5825U has integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics, while the 7500F has none. The 5825U has a locked multiplier, while the 7500F has an unlocked multiplier. The 5825U released on January 5, 2022, and the 7500F released on July 21, 2023. The 7500F has a launch MSRP of $179. The 5825U is a mobile part, and the 7500F is a desktop part.

The Verdict

The data makes the choice straightforward for performance. The Ryzen 5 7500F is faster in every benchmark recorded, from heavily threaded render workloads to single-core tasks and specialized instruction tests. Its 55.5% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 54.9% lead in single-core are not marginal differences; they represent a full generational leap in execution efficiency.

The Ryzen 7 5825U's only advantages are qualitative rather than measured performance. It offers integrated graphics, a much lower 15 W TDP, and compatibility with DDR4 memory, which may suit existing systems. It also has two additional cores and four additional threads, but the data shows those extra resources do not translate into any benchmark win against the 7500F.

For anyone building a desktop system and prioritizing compute performance, the Ryzen 5 7500F is the clear choice based on the recorded measurements. For a thin-and-light mobile system where power draw and integrated graphics matter, the Ryzen 7 5825U remains a viable option, but it cannot match the 7500F in raw performance.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7500F wins everywhere in the benchmark suite. It dominates in multi-threaded rendering with Cinebench R23 at 22,799 versus 10,152, and in physics simulation with PassMark at 1,788 versus 774. It also wins in data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number calculation, floating-point math, integer math, multi-thread, random string sorting, and single-thread tests. There is no benchmark category where the Ryzen 7 5825U comes out ahead.

The Ryzen 7 5825U's strengths lie outside the performance measurements. It is a mobile processor with a 15 W TDP, making it suitable for battery-powered laptops. It includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a discrete GPU in basic systems. It supports DDR4 memory, which is more common in existing laptops. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides more parallel resources on paper, even if the benchmark data shows the 7500F's 6-core design outperforming it in practice.

The Ryzen 5 7500F is the pick for desktop builds requiring maximum compute throughput, especially in rendering, physics, and data-heavy workloads. It offers DDR5 support, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The Ryzen 7 5825U is the pick for portable systems where low power consumption and integrated graphics are priorities, accepting lower performance in exchange for mobility and efficiency.