AMD Ryzen 5 7400F vs Intel Core i7-13650HX Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 7400F
Core i7-13650HX
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F vs Intel Core i7-13650HX
The Intel Core i7-13650HX and AMD Ryzen 5 7400F represent two distinct approaches to CPU design: a high-core-count mobile processor against a modern desktop chip. The benchmark data shows a clear overall winner, though the nature of the victories reveals important nuances. Across 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, the Intel part takes 16 wins, with the AMD chip securing a single, albeit significant, victory.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Intel Core i7-13650HX dominates the multi-threaded workloads, leveraging its substantial core and thread advantage. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel chip scores 24,580 against the AMD's 21,765, a 12.9% lead. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where Intel's 10,731 score is 17.4% higher than AMD's 9,141, and in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where the margin is 13% (2,477 vs 2,193). The PassMark multi-thread test shows a 19.7% advantage for Intel, with scores of 30,704 and 25,645 respectively.
The margin expands dramatically in certain compute-heavy tasks. In PassMark floating point math, the Intel processor scores 75,643, a full 65.2% ahead of the AMD's 45,799. Integer math tells a similar story, with Intel's 102,929 beating AMD's 74,745 by 37.7%. Data compression also favors Intel heavily: a score of 383,943 versus 289,999 represents a 32.4% lead. Even data encryption shows a 29.5% gap (21,649 vs 16,712).
Single-threaded performance is closer, but still favors Intel. Cinebench R23 single-core shows Intel at 3,470 and AMD at 3,072, a 13% difference. The PassMark single-thread test narrows this to just 2.2%, with scores of 3,769 and 3,689. The Intel chip also edges out the AMD part in extended instructions (23,146 vs 21,747, a 6.4% lead) and physics (1,745 vs 1,660, a 5.1% lead). Random string sorting goes to Intel by 17.3% (41,162 vs 35,096).
The sole AMD victory comes in the PassMark find prime numbers test. Here, the Ryzen 5 7400F scores 191, while the Intel chip manages only 103. This gives AMD a 46.1% advantage in this specific workload, a stark contrast to the rest of the data.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i7-13650HX is the clear winner for heavily threaded productivity and content-creation tasks. Its 65.2% lead in floating-point math makes it particularly well-suited for scientific computing, 3D rendering, and engineering simulations that rely on extensive FPU calculations. The 37.7% lead in integer math benefits general-purpose computing, database operations, and compilation workloads. The 32.4% advantage in data compression and 29.5% in encryption suggest it handles file archiving, backup solutions, and secure data processing with significantly more headroom. For users running multi-threaded video encoding, 3D modeling, or software development builds, the data consistently points to the Intel part.
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has a very specific, though notable, area of superiority: prime number calculation. The 46.1% lead in PassMark's find prime numbers test indicates a strong performance in this particular algorithmic workload. This could translate to advantages in certain cryptographic applications, number theory research, or specific benchmarking scenarios that rely on prime generation. It is worth remembering this is a single data point, and the AMD chip does not offer a similar advantage in the broader encryption or extended instruction tests.
Beyond this, the AMD part is competitive in single-threaded performance. While it trails the Intel chip, the 2.2% gap in PassMark's single-thread test shows that for many everyday applications and lightly-threaded games, the difference will be minor. The AMD's 3.70 GHz base clock is notably higher than Intel's 2.60 GHz, which helps it remain competitive in these scenarios despite the Intel chip's 4.90 GHz boost clock.
Architecture Differences
The two CPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and for different markets. The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a mobile processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a desktop processor using the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a smaller 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, but a larger 32 MB shared L3 cache. The AMD chip has 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, while the Intel part has a 257 mm² die.
These architectural choices have direct implications. The Intel chip's higher core count (14 vs 6) is the primary driver of its multi-threaded dominance. The AMD chip's larger L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB) may help in certain cache-sensitive workloads, though the benchmark data does not show this translating into overall wins. The AMD processor also boasts a higher memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, a specification not listed for the Intel part, and supports only DDR5 memory, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both support ECC memory.
The market segmentation is clear from the sockets: the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1964, a mobile socket, while the AMD uses AMD Socket AM5, a desktop platform. The Intel chip includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has no integrated graphics (N/A). The Intel part also has an unlocked multiplier, as does the AMD chip. The Intel processor offers Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes, while the AMD offers Gen 5 with 24 lanes.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33,089, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average score of 32,750. The Intel chip is slightly ahead.
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F better at any computing task?
A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F wins the PassMark find prime numbers test by a significant margin, scoring 191 compared to the Intel chip's 103, a 46.1% advantage.
Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of single-core performance?
A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX leads in single-core tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 3,470 versus 3,072 for the AMD, a 13% lead. The PassMark single-thread test shows a smaller gap, with Intel at 3,769 and AMD at 3,689, a 2.2% difference.
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?
A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?
A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX includes UHD Graphics 710. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has no integrated graphics (N/A).
Q: What are the process nodes for these two chips?
A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX is built on a 10 nm process, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F uses a 5 nm process from TSMC.
Specification Differences
The following specifications differ between the two processors:
- Cores: Intel 14, AMD 6
- Threads: Intel 20, AMD 12
- Base Clock: Intel 2.60 GHz, AMD 3.70 GHz
- Boost Clock: Intel 4.90 GHz, AMD 4.70 GHz
- TDP: Intel 55 W, AMD 65 W
- Socket: Intel BGA 1964, AMD Socket AM5
- Architecture: Intel Raptor Lake, AMD Zen 4
- Process Node: Intel 10 nm, AMD 5 nm
- Foundry: Intel, TSMC
- Transistors: Not listed for Intel, AMD 6,570 million
- Die Size: Intel 257 mm², AMD 71 mm²
- L1 Cache: Intel 80 KB (per core), AMD 64 KB (per core)
- L2 Cache: Intel 2 MB (per core), AMD 1 MB (per core)
- L3 Cache: Intel 24 MB (shared), AMD 32 MB (shared)
- Memory Support: Intel DDR4, DDR5; AMD DDR5 only
- Memory Bandwidth: Not listed for Intel, AMD 83.2 GB/s
- PCIe: Intel Gen 5, 20 Lanes; AMD Gen 5, 24 Lanes
- Integrated Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 710, AMD N/A
- Market Segment: Intel Mobile, AMD Desktop
- Release Date: Intel 2023-01-03, AMD 2025-01-08
- Part Number: Intel SRMED, AMD 100-000001845
The Verdict
The data presents a clear directive for users prioritizing raw computational throughput. The Intel Core i7-13650HX is the superior processor for multi-threaded workloads, and the margin of victory is often substantial. Its leads of 65.2% in floating-point math and 37.7% in integer math are decisive. For rendering, video encoding, and complex simulations, the Intel chip's 14 cores provide a level of parallelism the 6-core AMD chip cannot match. A user building a workstation for content creation or scientific computing should choose the Intel processor.
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is not without merit, but its strengths lie in a narrower band. The 46.1% victory in prime number calculation indicates a specialized capability, and its single-thread performance is respectable, trailing the Intel chip by only 2.2% in the PassMark test. For a desktop user focused on general productivity, web browsing, and applications that are not heavily multi-threaded, the AMD chip offers competitive performance. However, the benchmark data shows that the Intel processor wins in nearly every category tested, including single-threaded tests. The choice ultimately depends on the workload, but the weight of the evidence favors the Intel Core i7-13650HX for overall performance.