AMD Ryzen 5 7400F vs Intel Core i5-14600T Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Core i5-14600T are two desktop processors that land within 0.1% of each other in average benchmark score, making them direct competitors in the mid-range segment. The AMD part, built on Zen 4, delivers a 6-core/12-thread configuration, while the Intel chip, based on Raptor Lake, offers 14 cores and 20 threads. Despite the significant core-count disparity, benchmark results show a narrow overall margin, with the Intel processor winning 14 of 17 head-to-head tests, but the AMD processor claiming decisive victories in specific instruction-heavy workloads. The following analysis breaks down where each processor excels, the architectural reasons behind those differences, and the exact performance deltas observed.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600T is the clear winner in the majority of general-purpose and heavily threaded workloads. It takes the lead in all Cinebench tests, both single-core and multi-core, with margins ranging from 3.0% to 3.1%. In PassMark’s multithread test, it edges out the AMD chip by 2.9%, and in floating-point math, the Intel part is a dominant 29.2% ahead. Integer math also favors Intel substantially, with a 21.4% advantage. Data compression and encryption workloads see Intel ahead by 3.9% and 8.3%, respectively. Physics simulations also favor the Intel processor, which posts an 11.4% higher score.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, despite losing the majority of tests, wins decisively in three specific areas. The most significant victory is in PassMark’s extended instructions test, where it scores 28% higher than the Intel chip. It also wins the find prime numbers test by a massive 57.9% margin, and it takes a narrow 2.3% lead in random string sorting. These wins highlight a pattern: AMD’s Zen 4 architecture handles specific computational patterns—particularly those involving complex instruction sets and prime-number generation—more efficiently, even though it loses in raw throughput and general integer workloads.

For users prioritizing rendering, encryption, physics, or general productivity, the Intel Core i5-14600T is the stronger choice. For workloads that rely heavily on extended instruction sets or specialized mathematical operations, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F offers a clear advantage. The 14 wins for Intel versus 3 for AMD indicate a broad performance lead, but the magnitude of AMD’s wins in its three categories is substantial enough to matter for niche applications.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14600T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel. This process difference is significant, as the AMD chip’s smaller transistor size allows for a die size of just 71 mm², compared to Intel’s much larger 257 mm² die.

Core configurations differ dramatically. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel processor has 14 cores and 20 threads. This gives Intel a 133% core advantage and a 66% thread advantage. However, the AMD chip compensates with much higher base clocks: 3.70 GHz versus Intel’s 1.80 GHz. The boost clocks are closer, with Intel reaching 5.10 GHz compared to AMD’s 4.70 GHz. The TDP also differs substantially, with AMD rated at 65 watts and Intel at just 35 watts, indicating the Intel part is designed for lower power consumption despite having more cores.

Cache hierarchies are also distinct. The AMD processor offers 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, but only 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This means Intel has more per-core cache but less total L3 cache. Memory support differs as well: AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. AMD’s memory bandwidth is specified at 83.2 GB/s, while Intel’s is not listed in the data. Both support ECC memory.

Other notable differences include PCIe lanes. AMD offers Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD processor has no integrated graphics, whereas the Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, while Intel’s is locked. Finally, the AMD chip is a 7000 series part released on 2025-01-08, while the Intel chip is a Core 14th Gen part released on 2024-01-07.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a consistent, narrow lead for the Intel Core i5-14600T across all versions. In Cinebench R15, Intel wins both multi-core (2262 vs 2193, a 3.1% lead) and single-core (319 vs 309, also 3.1%). The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20, where Intel leads multi-core by 3.0% (9427 vs 9141) and single-core by 3.0% (1330 vs 1290). Cinebench R23 shows Intel ahead by 3.0% in multi-core (22447 vs 21765) and 3.1% in single-core (3169 vs 3072). These margins are small but consistent, indicating Intel’s architecture has a slight edge in these rendering workloads.

PassMark results reveal a more complex picture. In data compression, Intel leads by 3.9% (301827 vs 289999). Data encryption shows a larger Intel advantage of 8.3% (18226 vs 16712). Floating-point math is where Intel dominates most: a 29.2% lead (64726 vs 45799). Integer math follows with a 21.4% Intel lead (95112 vs 74745). The multithread test shows Intel ahead by 2.9% (26409 vs 25645). Physics scores favor Intel by 11.4% (1873 vs 1660). Single-thread performance is close, with Intel ahead by just 1.5% (3744 vs 3689).

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F’s wins are equally decisive. In extended instructions, AMD scores 21747 against Intel’s 16985, a 28% advantage. The find prime numbers test shows AMD at 191 versus Intel’s 121, a staggering 57.9% lead. Random string sorting sees AMD ahead by 2.3% (35096 vs 34310). These results suggest that while Intel wins on raw throughput and floating-point operations, AMD’s Zen 4 core handles specific instruction sets and algorithmic patterns far more efficiently.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F’s 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the AMD processor win any benchmark by a large margin?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F wins the PassMark find prime numbers test by 57.9% and the extended instructions test by 28%.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, while the Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707, a difference of just 0.1% in favor of AMD.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i5-14600T supports DDR4 memory; the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F supports DDR5 only.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T includes UHD Graphics 770, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14600T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7400F | Intel Core i5-14600T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.70 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Raphael | Raptor Lake-R |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 71 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | Not specified |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 24 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $229 | $255 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001845 | SRN46 |