AMD Ryzen 5 7400 vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a clear split between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 wins 6 of the 11 head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core 7 360 wins 5. However, the magnitude of the victories matters more than the count. The AMD part dominates in data-heavy and multi-threaded workloads, while the Intel part takes the lead in single-threaded and specific math operations.

The largest win for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 64,733 against 34,238 for the Intel Core 7 360, a delta of 89.1%. The AMD processor also shows a strong lead in data compression, scoring 261,749 versus 142,877, a 83.2% advantage. Random string sorting goes to the AMD part with 31,110 against 17,636, a 76.4% delta. Extended instructions show a 60.8% lead for the AMD chip (19,924 vs. 12,390). The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 also wins multithreaded performance with 21,712 points versus 15,544, a 39.7% margin. Data encryption favors the AMD part at 14,865 versus 11,164, a 33.2% delta.

The Intel Core 7 360 counters with its strongest result in single-threaded performance. It scores 4,274 against 3,248 for the AMD part, a 24% lead. This advantage extends to prime number finding, where the Intel processor scores 120 versus 79, a 34.2% delta in its favor. Floating point math goes to Intel at 44,963 versus 40,784, a 9.3% margin. The physics test also favors Intel with 1,213 against 1,150, a 5.2% difference.

The average benchmark score tells the broader story. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 has an average of 42,055, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41,963, 0.2% delta) and the Intel Core i9-12900K (42,335, -0.7% delta). The Intel Core 7 360 has an average of 18,374, sitting in the 72nd percentile. Its closest competitor is the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18,380, with a 0% delta.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is the clear choice for compute-heavy, parallel workloads. Its 12 threads enable it to handle data compression, encryption, and integer math with substantial margins. The 89.1% integer math lead and the 83.2% data compression advantage show that this processor excels when the workload can utilize multiple threads and process large blocks of data. Extended instructions and random string sorting also favor the AMD part, indicating strengths in cryptographic operations and data shuffling tasks.

The Intel Core 7 360 wins on single-threaded responsiveness and specific math functions. The 24% single-thread lead is significant for applications that rely on one core. Prime number finding shows a 34.2% advantage, which is notable for certain scientific and computational workloads. Floating point math favors Intel by 9.3%, and the physics test shows a 5.2% margin, suggesting that gaming physics and simulation tasks may perform better on this processor.

For multithreaded performance, the recorded data shows a 39.7% advantage for the AMD part. This aligns with its 12 threads versus 6 threads for the Intel processor. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 also delivers a higher average benchmark score (42,055 vs. 18,374), which places it far above the Intel part in overall CPU ranking.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It is built on a 5 nm process by TSMC and contains 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and is fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process. The transistor count and die size for the Intel part are not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and only 6 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the AMD processor a larger total cache capacity, which supports its strong data compression and string sorting results.

Memory architecture also separates the two. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X but operates on a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. It does not support ECC memory. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD processor has Radeon Graphics, while the Intel processor has Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Intel part is locked.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel base clock is 1.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65 watts for the AMD part and 15 watts for the Intel part.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1516. The market segment is Desktop for AMD and Mobile for Intel. The process node is 5 nm for AMD and 3 nm for Intel. The foundry is TSMC for AMD and Intel for the Intel part.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 has a release date of 2025-09-15, while the Intel Core 7 360 has a release date of 2026-04-15. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $426. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The part numbers are 100-000001900 for AMD and SAE3E for Intel.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-threaded score?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 scores 4,274 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 24% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7400's score of 3,248.

Q: What is the multithreaded performance difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 scores 21,712 in PassMark multithread, compared to 15,544 for the Intel Core 7 360. The AMD part has a 39.7% advantage.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 has an average benchmark score of 42,055, placing it in the 88th percentile. The Intel Core 7 360 has an average of 18,374, which is in the 72nd percentile.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 has a TDP of 65 watts. The Intel Core 7 360 has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 has 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 threads.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 supports dual-channel memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 7 360 supports single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

The Verdict

The data indicates two distinct use cases. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is the stronger processor for multi-threaded workloads, data processing, and encryption tasks. Its 12 threads, larger L3 cache (16 MB vs. 6 MB), and dual-channel memory give it substantial leads in integer math (89.1%), data compression (83.2%), and random string sorting (76.4%). The 88th percentile ranking and average score of 42,055 place it in a competitive tier alongside the Intel Core i9-12900K.

The Intel Core 7 360 is the better choice for single-threaded responsiveness and energy efficiency. Its 24% single-thread advantage, 34.2% lead in prime number finding, and 15-watt TDP make it suitable for mobile applications where battery life and thermal constraints matter. The 3 nm process node and higher boost clock (4.80 GHz vs. 4.30 GHz) contribute to its single-core strength.

For users prioritizing parallel compute performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 delivers consistently higher scores across the majority of head-to-head tests. For those who need fast single-core execution and low power consumption, the Intel Core 7 360 provides superior results in those specific areas. The benchmark data does not show a single winner across all categories; the choice depends on whether the workload favors the AMD part's thread scaling and cache capacity or the Intel part's single-core speed and efficiency.