AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows Intel Core 9 273PTE winning 12 of 17 benchmark comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT takes 5 wins. The Intel part's margin is consistent across Cinebench workloads, where it leads by 8.4% in multi-core tests (R15, R20, R23) and by 8.3% to 8.4% in single-core variants. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel scores 20445 against the AMD's 18724, a gap of 1,721 points. Single-core R23 shows 2886 versus 2643, a 243 point difference.

The PassMark suite tells a more varied story. The Intel part wins the floating point math test by a substantial 33.2% margin, scoring 60673 against AMD's 40537. Physics performance also heavily favors Intel, with a 31% advantage (1917 versus 1322). Integer math shows a 13.8% lead for Intel (82411 versus 71063). The multithread test gives Intel a 7.4% edge (24054 versus 22283), and random string sorting favors Intel by 7.9% (28973 versus 26693). Data compression is nearly even, with Intel ahead by just 0.6% (258704 versus 257118).

AMD's wins are concentrated in specific workloads. The largest is data encryption, where the Ryzen 5 5600XT leads by 11.9% (15944 versus 14253). Extended instructions show a 9.4% AMD advantage (17450 versus 15952). The single-thread PassMark test is extremely close, with AMD ahead by 1% (3469 versus 3433). Find prime numbers also goes to AMD by a slim 0.7% margin (143 versus 142).

The average benchmark scores reflect the overall balance: the Intel Core 9 273PTE averages 31143, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT averages 28940. That places the Intel part at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs in the database, versus the 81st percentile for AMD. The nearest rivals for the Intel part include the Intel Core i7-12700F with a 0.2% higher average, and the Core i7-13700TE at 0.4% higher. For the AMD part, the Intel Core i9-13900H and Core i5-12600H sit 0.2% above, while the Core Ultra 5 135H is 0.5% below.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PTE dominates rendering and compute-heavy tasks. Every Cinebench generation tested, from R15 through R23, shows the same 8.4% multi-core advantage. That consistency suggests the Intel part sustains its lead across different rendering engines and workload sizes. Floating point math is its strongest category, with the 33.2% margin being the largest single gap in the entire comparison. Physics performance, which often correlates with simulation and gaming physics calculations, also strongly favors Intel at 31% ahead. Integer math and multithread workloads follow the same pattern.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT holds clear advantages in encryption and extended instruction workloads. The 11.9% encryption lead indicates the AMD part handles AES and related cryptographic operations more efficiently. The 9.4% extended instructions win suggests the AMD architecture processes specialized instruction sets with less overhead. The single-thread PassMark result, while only 1% ahead, still represents a win for AMD in a category where Intel usually competes aggressively.

Workloads that involve data compression are effectively a tie, with only a 0.6% difference between the two. Prime number finding is similarly close at 0.7%. These near-even results indicate that for general productivity tasks, neither processor holds a meaningful edge.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT uses Zen 3 architecture on the Vermeer codename, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The transistor counts differ substantially: AMD lists 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, while Intel does not provide transistor or die size data in the database.

Core counts show the biggest structural difference. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 12 cores and 24 threads. Clock speeds also favor Intel at the top end: the Intel boosts to 5.50 GHz from a 1.40 GHz base, whereas the AMD boosts to 4.70 GHz from a 3.70 GHz base. The AMD part has a higher base clock by 2.30 GHz, but the Intel part has a higher boost clock by 0.80 GHz.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD uses 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. The Intel uses 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The Intel's L2 cache is four times larger per core, while its L3 is 4 MB larger overall.

Memory support shows a generational split. The AMD supports DDR4 only, with dual-channel memory and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

The Intel part includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730), while the AMD has no integrated graphics. The AMD multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, while the Intel multiplier is locked. The AMD uses AMD Socket AM4, and the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $549, while the AMD has no launch MSRP listed. The AMD released on 2024-10-30, and the Intel on 2026-03-08. The Intel runs at 45 W TDP versus 65 W for the AMD, meaning the Intel delivers higher performance at a lower rated power draw.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins most benchmarks, and its margins are decisive in several categories. For multi-core rendering, the 8.4% Cinebench lead and 33.2% floating point advantage make it the stronger choice for video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific computing, and any workload that scales with FPU throughput. The 31% physics lead also matters for simulation-heavy applications. Its higher core and thread count, larger caches, and DDR5 support all align with these results.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is the better option specifically for encryption-heavy workloads and extended instruction usage. The 11.9% encryption lead and 9.4% extended instructions win are meaningful for database encryption, secure communications, and specialized instruction sets. Its single-thread PassMark result, even at just 1% ahead, shows it remains competitive in lightly threaded scenarios despite having fewer cores.

For users who prioritize rendering throughput, floating point math, or physics simulation, the Intel part's consistent multi-benchmark dominance makes it the data-backed choice. For workloads dominated by encryption or specific instruction extensions, the AMD part offers measurable advantages. The near-ties in data compression and prime number finding mean general office work or web browsing will not reveal a meaningful difference between the two. The choice comes down to workload type: raw compute favors Intel, specialized cryptographic and instruction-level tasks favor AMD.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE averages 31143, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT averages 28940.

Q: How large is the Intel part's lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel scores 20445 versus 18724, which is an 8.4% advantage.

Q: In which benchmark does the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT have its largest win?

A: Data encryption, where it scores 15944 against Intel's 14253, an 11.9% lead.

Q: Do the two processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD supports DDR4 only, while the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE boosts to 5.50 GHz, compared to 4.70 GHz for the AMD.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT | Intel Core 9 273PTE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 12 |

| Threads | 12 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.70 GHz | 1.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 4,150 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 74 mm² | Not listed |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $549 |

| Release Date | 2024-10-30 | 2026-03-08 |