AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS vs Intel Xeon D-1732TE Comparison

The Intel Xeon D-1732TE and AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS are evenly matched in overall benchmark averages, with 2 wins apiece in their head-to-head tests, yet they achieve parity through entirely different means. The Xeon D-1732TE, a server-class Ice Lake-D part, dominates in the modern Cinebench R23 workloads, while the Ryzen 5 5600HS, a mobile Zen 3 chip, wins decisively in the older R15 tests. Both processors sit at the 54th percentile among all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores are nearly identical: 3486 for the Intel part versus 3447 for the AMD part, a gap of just 1.1%.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1732TE leads with an average benchmark score of 3486, compared to 3447 for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS. This places the Xeon just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900TE, while the Ryzen 5 5600HS sits exactly level with the Intel Core i7-10870H.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1732TE wins the Cinebench R23 multi-core test with a score of 12052, which is 26% higher than the Ryzen 5 5600HS's 9564. This is the largest single benchmark margin between the two processors in the head-to-head data.

Q: Which processor wins the single-core tests?

A: The results are split by benchmark generation. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS wins with 223 versus 171 for the Xeon, a 23.3% advantage. However, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel Xeon D-1732TE wins with 1701 versus 1367, a 24.4% margin.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1732TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the AMD chip wins the Cinebench R15 multi-core test with 1563 versus 1214.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Xeon D-1732TE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS does not. This reflects their different market segments: the Xeon is aimed at Server/Workstation use, while the Ryzen is a Mobile processor.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1732TE is built on Intel's 10 nm process, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS uses TSMC's 7 nm process. The AMD chip also has a smaller die size at 180 mm², with 10,700 million transistors.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Xeon D-1732TE and AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS represent fundamentally different architectural philosophies. The Xeon D-1732TE is based on Intel's Ice Lake-D architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It is a server-oriented design with 8 cores and 16 threads, built for the Intel BGA 2227 socket. The Ryzen 5 5600HS, by contrast, uses AMD's Zen 3 architecture under the Cezanne codename, fabricated on a 7 nm process by TSMC, and fits into the AMD Socket FP6 for mobile platforms.

Cache layouts diverge significantly. The Intel chip allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, with 15 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip uses 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a slightly larger 16 MB shared L3 cache. This gives the Xeon more L2 cache per core, while the Ryzen has more total L3 cache, a difference that matters for certain workload patterns.

Memory architecture also separates the two. The Xeon D-1732TE supports triple-channel DDR4 with a theoretical bandwidth of 64.0 GB/s, while the Ryzen 5 5600HS uses dual-channel DDR4 with a slightly higher bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s. The Xeon supports ECC memory, a critical feature for server reliability, while the Ryzen does not. PCIe capabilities differ as well: the Xeon offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen is limited to Gen 3. The Ryzen includes integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics, whereas the Xeon has no integrated graphics.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results tell a story of workload-dependent dominance. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS wins decisively with a score of 1563 against the Xeon's 1214, a 22.3% advantage. This is notable because the Xeon has 8 cores and 16 threads, two more cores and four more threads than the Ryzen's 6 cores and 12 threads. The Ryzen's higher base clock of 3.00 GHz (versus 1.90 GHz for the Xeon) likely contributes to this older benchmark's outcome.

The single-core R15 test follows the same pattern. The Ryzen 5 5600HS scores 223, which is 23.3% higher than the Xeon's 171. This aligns with the Ryzen's much higher boost clock of 4.20 GHz compared to the Xeon's 3.00 GHz. The AMD chip demonstrates clear superiority in this legacy benchmark, winning both R15 tests by roughly the same margin.

The picture flips dramatically in Cinebench R23. The Intel Xeon D-1732TE wins the multi-core test with 12052 points, a 26% improvement over the Ryzen's 9564. This is the largest delta in either direction among the head-to-head benchmarks. The Xeon's advantage in this newer, more demanding workload likely stems from its additional cores and threads, which scale better under sustained multi-threaded load.

The R23 single-core test also goes to Intel, with the Xeon scoring 1701 versus 1367 for the Ryzen, a 24.4% margin. This is surprising given the Ryzen's higher clock speeds, but the benchmark results are unambiguous. The Xeon wins both R23 tests, while the Ryzen wins both R15 tests, resulting in a 2-2 tie in the head-to-head comparison.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split: choose the Intel Xeon D-1732TE if your workloads resemble Cinebench R23, which stresses modern multi-threaded and single-threaded performance with larger data sets. The Xeon's 26% lead in R23 multi-core and 24.4% lead in R23 single-core are substantial, and its 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides headroom for server-type tasks. It also offers ECC memory support, triple-channel memory, and PCIe Gen 4, all of which are server-relevant features. The launch MSRP is $730.

Choose the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS if your workloads mirror Cinebench R15, where it wins by 22.3% in multi-core and 23.3% in single-core. It achieves this with 6 cores and 12 threads, fewer than the Xeon, but with higher base and boost clocks (3.00 GHz and 4.20 GHz respectively). It also has a lower TDP of 35 watts versus 52 watts for the Xeon, and includes integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics, making it a more self-contained mobile solution. Its average benchmark score of 3447 is within 1.1% of the Xeon's 3486, so overall performance parity is close.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The Intel Xeon D-1732TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks differ substantially: 1.90 GHz for the Xeon versus 3.00 GHz for the Ryzen. Boost clocks also favor AMD: 3.00 GHz versus 4.20 GHz. The Xeon has a TDP of 52 watts, while the Ryzen is rated at 35 watts.

Sockets are incompatible: Intel BGA 2227 for the Xeon, AMD Socket FP6 for the Ryzen. The Xeon uses Ice Lake architecture on a 10 nm process from Intel's foundry, while the Ryzen uses Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm process from TSMC. The Ryzen's die size is 180 mm² with 10,700 million transistors; the Xeon's die size and transistor count are not specified in the data.

Cache configurations differ per core: the Xeon has 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core, while the Ryzen has 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core. Shared L3 cache is 15 MB for the Xeon and 16 MB for the Ryzen. Memory support is triple-channel DDR4 for the Xeon with 64.0 GB/s bandwidth, versus dual-channel DDR4 for the Ryzen with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is available only on the Xeon. PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the Xeon, versus Gen 3 for the Ryzen. The Ryzen includes integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics; the Xeon has none. The Xeon targets the Server/Workstation segment, while the Ryzen targets Mobile.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon D-1732TE wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core (12052 versus 9564, a 26% lead) and Cinebench R23 single-core (1701 versus 1367, a 24.4% lead). These wins make it the better choice for modern rendering workloads, multi-threaded server applications, and tasks that benefit from its 8 cores and 16 threads. The Xeon's ECC memory support and triple-channel memory bus further suit it to reliability-focused server environments. Its PCIe Gen 4 connectivity provides higher bandwidth for compatible peripherals, and its 15 MB shared L3 cache supports data-intensive operations.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS wins in Cinebench R15 multi-core (1563 versus 1214, a 22.3% lead) and Cinebench R15 single-core (223 versus 171, a 23.3% lead). These wins suggest the Ryzen excels in legacy applications and single-threaded tasks that rely on high clock speeds. Its 4.20 GHz boost clock is a significant advantage in burst workloads, and its 35-watt TDP makes it more power-efficient. The integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics mean the Ryzen can handle display output without a discrete GPU, a key advantage for mobile systems. Its 16 MB L3 cache and 68.3 GB/s memory bandwidth provide competitive memory performance, despite the dual-channel configuration. The Ryzen also has a larger average benchmark score gap of 0.1% to 0.2% over its nearest rivals, indicating it sits comfortably among comparable processors.