AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT vs Intel Core 5 221E Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT

CORE STATE Cezanne
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 221E

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads
5,523
N/A
3dmark_2_threads
1,794
N/A
3dmark_4_threads
3,446
N/A
3dmark_8_threads
4,968
N/A
3dmark_max_threads
5,554
N/A
3dmark_single_thread
913
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,740
2,613
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
245
368
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,254
10,891
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,023
1,537
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
17,272
25,933
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,438
3,661
geekbench_multicore
7,986
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
1,843
N/A
passmark_data_compression
258,882
324,285
passmark_data_encryption
15,873
19,205
passmark_extended_instructions
18,041
18,216
passmark_find_prime_numbers
57
173
passmark_floating_point_math
39,817
79,028
passmark_integer_math
69,566
117,813
passmark_multithread
20,325
30,510
passmark_physics
875
2,230
passmark_random_string_sorting
26,188
37,686
passmark_single_thread
3,348
4,147
passmark_singlethread
3,348
4,147

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT vs Intel Core 5 221E

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and Intel Core 5 221E represent fundamentally different design approaches. The AMD part uses the Zen 3 architecture on TSMC's 7 nm process, built on the Cezanne codename with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. It packs 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Cache allocation includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3.

The Intel Core 5 221E uses the Bartlett Lake codename on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It delivers 14 cores and 20 threads, running at a 2.70 GHz base clock and boosting up to 5.20 GHz. Its cache hierarchy is notably different: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Both processors carry a 65 W TDP, but the similarity ends there.

Memory support diverges sharply. The AMD chip is limited to DDR4 with dual-channel access and a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but with a substantially higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The AMD processor does not support ECC memory; the Intel chip does. PCIe connectivity also differs: AMD provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics are present on both. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT uses Radeon Vega 7, while the Intel Core 5 221E uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel part is locked. Socket compatibility also separates them: AMD Socket AM4 versus Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor launched in January 2024, while the Intel chip arrived in January 2025.

The Verdict

The benchmark data delivers a clear verdict: the Intel Core 5 221E wins every single head-to-head benchmark in the database, 17 wins to 0 for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT. The average benchmark score reflects this dominance: the Intel part scores 40,144 against the AMD's 20,733, nearly double. The Intel chip sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD part ranks at the 74th percentile.

The scale of the Intel advantage is consistent across workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel chip scores 25,933 versus 17,272 for AMD, a 33.4% gap. Single-core performance shows the same pattern: Cinebench R23 single-core delivers 3,661 for Intel against 2,438 for AMD. The Intel part's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, and Intel Core i9-13905H, all within 0.4% of its average score. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT, meanwhile, sits closest to the Intel Core i5-12490F, Intel Xeon 6325P, and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, all within 0.5%.

For users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, the Intel Core 5 221E is the only rational choice from this data. Its 14 cores and 20 threads deliver roughly 50% more multi-thread performance in PassMark (30,510 versus 20,325) and a 33.4% advantage in Cinebench R20 multi-core. The AMD part does offer value through its unlocked multiplier and integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics, but the performance gap is too large to overcome in any measured workload.

The data shows no scenario where the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the Intel Core 5 221E. The Intel chip leads in every category: single-thread, multi-thread, integer math, floating point, encryption, compression, and physics. The only benchmark where the two approach parity is PassMark extended instructions, where Intel leads by just 1% (18,216 versus 18,041).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

The Intel Core 5 221E has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multi-core workloads?

The Intel chip leads by 33.4% across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests. In PassMark multi-thread, the Intel part scores 30,510 versus 20,325 for AMD, a 33.4% gap.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory?

The Intel Core 5 221E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT supports only DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

The Intel Core 5 221E supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT does not.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

The Intel Core 5 221E boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: How do their single-thread scores compare?

In PassMark single-thread, the Intel chip scores 4,147 versus 3,348 for AMD, a 19.3% advantage. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel leads 3,661 to 2,438, a 33.4% gap.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT | Intel Core 5 221E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Not specified |

| Codename | Cezanne | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | Not specified |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Launch MSRP | $140 | $232 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 221E dominates every recorded benchmark. The most lopsided result is PassMark find prime numbers, where Intel scores 173 against AMD's 57, a 67.1% advantage. PassMark physics shows a similar gap: 2,230 versus 875, a 60.8% difference. These two tests highlight the Intel chip's substantial advantage in integer-heavy and physics simulation workloads.

In floating-point math, the Intel part scores 79,028 against 39,817 for AMD, a 49.6% lead. Integer math follows with 117,813 versus 69,566, a 41% gap. Data compression shows Intel ahead at 324,285 versus 258,882, a 20.2% difference. Data encryption delivers 19,205 versus 15,873, a 17.3% edge for Intel.

The Cinebench suite shows consistent 33.4% Intel advantages across all versions and thread counts. Cinebench R15 multi-core: 2,613 versus 1,740. Cinebench R20 multi-core: 10,891 versus 7,254. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 25,933 versus 17,272. Single-core results mirror this: R15 at 368 versus 245, R20 at 1,537 versus 1,023, and R23 at 3,661 versus 2,438.

PassMark multi-thread confirms the pattern: 30,510 versus 20,325, a 33.4% gap. Random string sorting shows Intel ahead 37,686 to 26,188, a 30.5% difference. The closest contest in the entire head-to-head set is PassMark extended instructions, where Intel leads by only 1% (18,216 versus 18,041). Single-thread PassMark results give Intel a 19.3% edge at 4,147 versus 3,348.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 221E wins in every measured category, so the use-case split is defined by the degree of its advantage rather than by any AMD victory. The largest margins come in prime number finding, physics, floating-point math, and integer math, where Intel leads by 40% to 67%. These workloads benefit directly from the Intel chip's 14 cores, 20 threads, and higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

For productivity tasks like data compression and encryption, the Intel part holds a smaller but still decisive edge of 17% to 20%. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT trails by roughly one-third in multi-threaded rendering workloads, as shown by the Cinebench results. The Intel chip's 24 MB L3 cache and higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s contribute to its consistent lead.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT does have one measurable advantage: its launch MSRP of $140 sits well below the Intel's $232. It also offers an unlocked multiplier, which the Intel part lacks, and its Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics may differ in capability from the UHD Graphics 730. However, the database contains no benchmark where the AMD chip wins, so any potential overclocking headroom is not reflected in the recorded scores.

For users whose primary metric is raw performance, the Intel Core 5 221E is the clear selection. The data shows its average benchmark score of 40,144 places it near the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, a strong mainstream desktop processor. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT, with its average score of 20,733, competes with the Intel Core i5-12490F and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, both of which are lower-tier parts. The percentile rankings confirm the hierarchy: 87th for Intel versus 74th for AMD.

The only workloads where a user might consider the AMD chip are those that benefit from its unlocked multiplier or its lower platform cost, but the measured benchmarks provide no performance justification. Every single test, from single-threaded Cinebench to multi-threaded PassMark, favors the Intel Core 5 221E by at least 1% and often by 30% or more.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 5600GT
5 221E
Core Specs
Cores
6
14 +133.3%
Threads
12
20 +66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.6
2.7 -25.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.6
5.2 +13.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.6
2.7 -25.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.6
5.2 +13.0%
Multiplier
36
27 -25.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
65 0.0%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
154 W
PPT
61-88 W
—
Configurable TDP
45W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
—
Codename
Cezanne
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 3 (Cezanne))
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Transistors
10,700 million
—
Die Size
180 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
AMD 300 Series*, AMD 400 Series, AMD 500 Series
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
—
2.1 GHz up to 3.9 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 7
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$140
$232
Part Number
100-000001488
SRQDVQ659
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
—
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Wraith Stealth
—
View Ryzen 5 5600GT Details View Core 5 221E Details