AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data records 23 benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G. The Ryzen 5 5600G wins 15 of those tests, while the Ryzen 7 4800H wins 8. The margin of victory varies significantly by workload, revealing a clear split between single-threaded and multi-threaded performance.

The Ryzen 7 4800H takes its largest win in PassMark random string sorting, scoring 29,181 against 25,354, a 15.1% advantage. It also leads in 3DMark 16-thread (5,876 vs 5,451, 7.8% ahead), 3DMark max-threads (5,841 vs 5,455, 7.1% ahead), and Cinebench R15 multi-core (1,854 vs 1,724, 7.5% ahead). In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 4800H scores 11,135.5 versus 10,551, a 5.5% edge. The 4800H also wins 3DMark 8-thread (4,789 vs 4,694, 2% ahead), PassMark data compression (269,334 vs 249,302, 8% ahead), and PassMark data encryption (15,530 vs 15,247, 1.9% ahead).

The Ryzen 5 5600G dominates the single-threaded and light-thread tests. Its largest win is in PassMark find prime numbers, where it scores 57 versus 33, a 42.1% advantage. In Geekbench single-core, the 5600G leads 1,801 to 1,329, a 26.2% gap. Geekbench multi-core also goes to the 5600G at 8,428 versus 6,490, a 23% margin, which is notable because the 4800H has more cores. The 5600G wins Cinebench R15 single-core (228 vs 188, 17.5% ahead), 3DMark single-thread (872 vs 721, 17.3% ahead), 3DMark 2-thread (1,705 vs 1,421, 16.7% ahead), and PassMark single-thread (3,177 vs 2,597, 18.3% ahead). It also leads in 3DMark 4-thread (3,258 vs 2,739, 15.9% ahead), PassMark physics (900 vs 754, 16.2% ahead), PassMark multi-thread (19,717 vs 18,222, 7.6% ahead), PassMark integer math (67,344 vs 63,999, 5% ahead), PassMark floating point math (37,830 vs 37,312, 1.4% ahead), and PassMark extended instructions (17,334 vs 17,035, 1.7% ahead).

The data shows that the 4800H's wins cluster in heavily threaded workloads, while the 5600G's wins span both single-thread and many multi-thread tests, including Geekbench multi-core where its architectural efficiency overcomes the core count deficit.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and market segments. The Ryzen 7 4800H is a 4000 series mobile chip built on Zen 2 architecture with the Renoir codename, while the Ryzen 5 5600G is a 5000 series desktop chip built on Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 7 nm process, but the transistor counts differ: the 4800H has 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, while the 5600G has 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die.

The core and thread configuration is a major difference. The 4800H offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the 5600G offers 6 cores and 12 threads. The 5600G compensates with higher clock speeds: its base clock is 3.90 GHz versus 2.90 GHz, and its boost clock is 4.40 GHz versus 4.20 GHz. The power envelope also differs, with the 4800H rated at 45 W TDP for mobile use, while the 5600G is rated at 65 W TDP for desktop use.

Cache allocation is another key distinction. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, but the L3 cache differs substantially: the 4800H has 8 MB shared L3, while the 5600G has 16 MB L3. This doubled L3 cache, combined with the newer Zen 3 architecture, explains much of the 5600G's single-threaded advantage.

The memory support differs as well. The 4800H supports DDR4 and LPDDR4, while the 5600G supports DDR4 only. Both use dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Neither supports ECC memory. PCIe support is Gen 3 for both, but the 5600G specifies 16 lanes (CPU only).

The integrated graphics differ. The 4800H uses Radeon Graphics with 448 SPs, while the 5600G uses Radeon Vega 7. The sockets are incompatible: the 4800H uses AMD Socket FP6, while the 5600G uses AMD Socket AM4. The 5600G has an unlocked multiplier, while the 4800H does not. The 5600G carries a launch MSRP of $259.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data points to distinct use cases. The Ryzen 7 4800H wins in scenarios that scale with core count and thread count. Its 8 cores and 16 threads give it an edge in 3DMark's 16-thread and max-thread tests, Cinebench R15 and R23 multi-core tests, and PassMark data compression and encryption. For workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or data compression that can utilize all available threads, the 4800H's extra two cores provide a measurable, though modest, advantage ranging from 1.9% to 8%.

The Ryzen 5 5600G wins in single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads by a much larger margin. Its 17.3% to 26.2% advantages in single-thread tests across 3DMark, Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark indicate that day-to-day responsiveness, gaming performance in CPU-bound scenarios, and applications that rely on a few fast cores will favor the 5600G significantly. The 5600G also wins PassMark multi-thread overall (19,717 vs 18,222, 7.6% ahead) and Geekbench multi-core (8,428 vs 6,490, 23% ahead), suggesting that its architectural efficiency per core is high enough to overcome the core deficit in some multi-threaded workloads.

The 5600G's wins in PassMark integer math (5% ahead), floating point math (1.4% ahead), and extended instructions (1.7% ahead) are narrow but consistent. Its win in PassMark physics by 16.2% suggests better performance in simulation or physics-heavy tasks. The 4800H's win in random string sorting by 15.1% indicates an advantage in memory-heavy sorting operations, likely related to its different memory support and cache configuration.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 4800H | AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |

|---|---|---|

| Series | 4000 series | 5000 series |

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base clock | 2.90 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.20 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP6 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 |

| Codename | Renoir | Cezanne |

| Process node | 7 nm | 7 nm |

| Transistors | 9,800 million | 10,700 million |

| Die size | 156 mm² | 180 mm² |

| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory support | DDR4, LPDDR4 | DDR4 |

| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Graphics 448SP | Radeon Vega 7 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | Yes |

| Launch MSRP | None listed | $259 |

The L1 and L2 caches are identical at 64 KB per core and 512 KB per core. Memory bus is dual-channel for both, with the same 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported by either. The release dates differ, with the 4800H released in January 2020 and the 5600G in April 2021. Both are currently listed as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800H has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Why does the Ryzen 5 5600G win in Geekbench multi-core despite having fewer cores?

A: The 5600G scores 8,428 in Geekbench multi-core versus 6,490 for the 4800H, a 23% advantage. This is attributed to its higher base clock (3.90 GHz vs 2.90 GHz), higher boost clock (4.40 GHz vs 4.20 GHz), larger 16 MB L3 cache, and newer Zen 3 architecture.

Q: What is the largest single benchmark margin between the two?

A: The largest margin is in PassMark find prime numbers, where the 5600G scores 57 versus 33 for the 4800H, a 42.1% difference.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The 4800H supports DDR4 and LPDDR4, while the 5600G supports DDR4 only. Both use dual-channel memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are the sockets interchangeable?

A: No. The 4800H uses AMD Socket FP6, while the 5600G uses AMD Socket AM4. They are not compatible with each other.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The 5600G has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the 4800H has 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear recommendation based on workload type. For users who prioritize heavily threaded workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, data compression, and encryption, the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H is the choice. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration delivers consistent wins in Cinebench multi-core, 3DMark multi-thread tests, and PassMark data compression, with margins ranging from 1.9% to 8% over the 5600G. The 4800H also holds a 15.1% advantage in random string sorting, which may matter for specific database or sorting tasks.

For users who prioritize single-threaded performance, general responsiveness, and applications that rely on fewer, faster cores, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is the clear winner. Its single-thread advantages are large across every benchmark suite: 17.3% in 3DMark, 17.5% in Cinebench R15, 11% in Cinebench R23, 26.2% in Geekbench, and 18.3% in PassMark. The 5600G also wins overall PassMark multi-thread and Geekbench multi-core, meaning its efficiency can overcome the core count deficit in certain multi-threaded applications. Its 16 MB L3 cache and Zen 3 architecture provide a strong foundation for gaming and desktop productivity.

The 5600G's additional advantages include an unlocked multiplier for overclocking and a desktop form factor with a 65 W TDP, while the 4800H is a mobile chip with a 45 W TDP. The 5600G also has a listed launch MSRP of $259, while the 4800H has no listed launch MSRP. The 4800H's advantages are limited to multi-threaded scenarios and its support for LPDDR4 memory, which is relevant for mobile designs. The benchmark record shows 15 wins for the 5600G and 8 wins for the 4800H, with the 5600G's victories generally larger in magnitude. Users should select based on whether their primary workloads are more thread-scalable or more single-thread dependent.