AMD Ryzen 5 5600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and AMD Ryzen 5 5600 are both 6-core, 12-thread desktop processors on the AM4 socket, but benchmark data reveals they are tuned for different priorities. The Ryzen 5 5600GT wins 12 of 25 head-to-head tests, while the Ryzen 5 5600 wins 13, yet the margin of victory in each direction tells a clear story: the 5600 is decisively faster in heavy multi-threaded and single-core rendering workloads, while the 5600GT counters with wins in several specialized and light-thread tasks, alongside its integrated graphics advantage.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result in the entire comparison belongs to the Ryzen 5 5600 in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 137 versus the 5600GT’s 57. That is a 58.4% advantage, an enormous gap that highlights a fundamental difference in integer-heavy, branch-predictor-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600 also dominates in PassMark physics, scoring 1285 versus 875, a 31.9% lead. This pattern continues across the Cinebench suite: the 5600 leads by 5.7% in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests, and by the same 5.7% in R20 and R23 single-core tests.

The Geekbench results amplify this trend. The Ryzen 5 5600 scores 9158 in multi-core versus the 5600GT’s 7986, a 12.8% advantage, and 1936 versus 1843 in single-core, a 4.8% lead. In 3DMark’s 16-thread and max-thread tests, the 5600 wins by 2.1% and 1.9%, respectively. The PassMark multi-thread test also favors the 5600, with a score of 21541 versus 20325, a 5.6% margin.

However, the Ryzen 5 5600GT secures its wins in lighter-thread and specialized workloads. In 3DMark’s 2-thread test, it wins 1794 to 1737, a 3.3% edge, and in the 4-thread and 8-thread tests, it wins by 4% and 3.5%, respectively. The single-thread 3DMark result goes to the 5600GT at 913 versus 882, a 3.5% lead. The PassMark suite shows the 5600GT winning extended instructions (18041 vs 16993, a 6.2% lead), data compression (258882 vs 251687, a 2.9% lead), floating point math (39817 vs 38778, a 2.7% lead), and integer math (69566 vs 68396, a 1.7% lead). It also wins PassMark single-thread (3348 vs 3256, a 2.8% margin) and random string sorting (26188 vs 25943, a 0.9% edge).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 20733, compared to the Ryzen 5 5600’s 20468. Both sit at the 74th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How do these chips compare to their closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT’s nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-12490F, which scores 20802, a 0.3% difference. The Ryzen 5 5600’s nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, scoring 20454, a 0.1% difference.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5600GT faster in single-core performance?

A: It depends on the benchmark. The 5600GT wins 3DMark single-thread (913 vs 882, a 3.5% lead) and PassMark single-thread (3348 vs 3256, a 2.8% lead), but the Ryzen 5 5600 wins Cinebench R15 single-core (260 vs 245, a 5.8% lead), R20 single-core (1085 vs 1023, a 5.7% lead), and R23 single-core (2584 vs 2438, a 5.7% lead).

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 5 5600GT does not.

Q: What is the difference in PCIe support?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen 5 5600GT is limited to PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: Which chip has integrated graphics?

A: Only the Ryzen 5 5600GT has integrated graphics, featuring a Radeon Vega 7. The Ryzen 5 5600 has no integrated graphics.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on the Zen 3 architecture using TSMC’s 7 nm process, but they come from different dies. The Ryzen 5 5600GT uses the Cezanne die, which measures 180 mm² and contains 10,700 million transistors. In contrast, the Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer die, which is considerably smaller at 74 mm² and has 4,150 million transistors. This explains why the 5600GT has integrated graphics—the Cezanne die includes a Radeon Vega 7 GPU—while the 5600’s larger L3 cache is a key architectural distinction.

The L3 cache configuration differs significantly. The Ryzen 5 5600GT has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Ryzen 5 5600 has 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. The 5600 also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the 5600GT. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the 5600 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, whereas the 5600GT is limited to Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Clock speeds are marginally different, with the 5600GT boosting to 4.60 GHz and the 5600 to 4.40 GHz, though the 5600GT has a lower base clock of 3.60 GHz versus 3.50 GHz on the 5600.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split in use cases. The Ryzen 5 5600 is the stronger pure CPU performer for compute-intensive tasks. It wins every Cinebench test by 5.7%, takes a massive 58.4% lead in PassMark find prime numbers, and holds a 12.8% advantage in Geekbench multi-core. For users prioritizing rendering, physics simulation, or any workload that scales with sustained multi-core throughput, the 5600 is the superior choice based on benchmark results.

The Ryzen 5 5600GT, however, is not a slouch in its own right. It wins the majority of light-threaded 3DMark tests by margins of 3.3% to 4%, and it leads in PassMark extended instructions by 6.2%, a sign that its specialized instruction handling is more efficient. The 5600GT also has the integrated Radeon Vega 7 GPU, making it the only viable option for a build without a discrete graphics card. Given that its average benchmark score is slightly higher (20733 vs 20468), the 5600GT is a more balanced package for mixed workloads, especially when factoring in its launch MSRP of $140, compared to the 5600’s launch MSRP of $199.

Specification Differences

The table below outlines the key differences between the two processors.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| Codename | Cezanne | Vermeer |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | 4,150 million |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 74 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 32 MB (shared) |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 | None |

| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2022-04-19 |

| Launch MSRP | $140 | $199 |

| Part Number | 100-000001488 | 100-000000927 |

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 5600 is the clear winner for multi-threaded rendering and compute. It wins all three Cinebench versions (R15, R20, R23) in both single-core and multi-core, with margins consistently around 5.7%. It also wins Geekbench multi-core by 12.8% and single-core by 4.8%, along with 3DMark 16-thread and max-thread tests. For users running video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific simulations, the 5600’s larger 32 MB L3 cache and higher sustained throughput give it a decisive edge.

The Ryzen 5 5600GT wins in light-threaded and specialized scenarios. It takes the 3DMark 2-thread, 4-thread, 8-thread, and single-thread tests, with the 4-thread win being its largest at 4%. In the PassMark suite, it wins data compression, encryption, extended instructions, floating point math, integer math, random string sorting, and single-thread tests. The 6.2% lead in extended instructions suggests the 5600GT handles SIMD and specialized instruction sets more efficiently. Its integrated Radeon Vega 7 GPU is a decisive advantage for office PCs, media centers, or budget gaming rigs that skip a discrete GPU entirely, as the 5600 cannot output video without a separate card.