AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE records an average benchmark score of 40585, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT records 26748. That places the Intel part at the 87th percentile of all CPUs tracked, versus the 79th percentile for the AMD part.

Q: How large is the gap in multi-threaded rendering workloads?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 26455 against the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT's 15848. That is a 40.1% deficit for the AMD chip, and the same 40.1% delta appears across the R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests.

Q: Does the AMD processor win any benchmark in the head-to-head set?

A: No. Across all 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, the Intel Core 5 223PE wins every single one. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT has zero wins in this comparison set.

Q: Which processor supports error-correcting memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT does not. Both processors support dual-channel memory, but the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, whereas the AMD part is limited to DDR4.

Q: What is the difference in single-thread performance between the two?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 3734 versus 2237 for the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT, a 40.1% advantage for Intel. PassMark single-thread testing shows 4219 for Intel versus 3066 for AMD, a 27.3% gap.

Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT has 51.2 GB/s. This is a substantial difference, though the AMD part's DDR4-only support explains part of the gap.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT uses the Zen 3 architecture under the Cezanne codename, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The process node difference is notable: 7 nm versus 10 nm gives the AMD design a density advantage on paper, but the benchmark data shows the Intel part overcoming that with a newer architecture and higher boost clocks.

Core counts differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. That is a 33% core advantage and a 33% thread advantage for Intel, which shows up directly in multi-threaded workloads. The AMD chip's base clock is 3.60 GHz and boost is 4.40 GHz. The Intel chip's base clock is 2.90 GHz but its boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz. The lower base clock on Intel is offset by a much higher boost ceiling, and the single-thread benchmark results confirm the Intel part sustains that advantage under load.

Cache hierarchies differ in structure and capacity. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel Core 5 223PE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The larger per-core L2 on Intel (2 MB versus 512 KB) is a fourfold difference, and the L3 total is 50% larger on Intel. This cache advantage likely contributes to the Intel part's lead in memory-sensitive workloads like data compression and integer math.

Memory support diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR4 only with a dual-channel bus and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, still dual-channel, but with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, which the AMD part does not. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD chip uses Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ too: the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT carries Radeon Vega 7, while the Intel Core 5 223PE uses UHD Graphics 730.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records 17 head-to-head benchmarks, and the Intel Core 5 223PE wins all of them. The consistency of the margin is striking. In Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests, the Intel part leads by exactly 40.1% each time. Single-core Cinebench tests show the same 40.1% margin: R15 single-core 376 versus 225, R20 single-core 1568 versus 939, R23 single-core 3734 versus 2237. This uniformity across multiple Cinebench versions suggests a consistent architectural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

The largest gaps appear in specific PassMark sub-tests. PassMark physics shows the Intel part at 2493 versus 840 for AMD, a 66.3% deficit. PassMark find prime numbers shows 159 versus 54, also a 66% deficit. Floating point math shows 76468 versus 36694, a 52% gap. These three workloads reward the Intel part's higher boost clock and larger cache. The physics test, in particular, often scales with core count and clock speed, and the Intel part has both advantages.

The smallest margin is in PassMark data encryption, where the Intel part scores 18448 versus 14754, a 20% advantage. That workload still favors Intel, but the gap narrows considerably. Data compression shows a 29.6% advantage for Intel (346623 versus 243904). Extended instructions show a 31% gap (24672 versus 17027). Random string sorting shows a 31.3% gap (35798 versus 24583). Integer math shows a 35.7% gap (99819 versus 64218).

PassMark multi-thread shows the Intel part at 31124 versus 19000, a 39% advantage. PassMark single-thread shows 4219 versus 3066, a 27.3% advantage. The single-thread margin is smaller than the Cinebench single-core margin, which suggests the two test suites weight different aspects of single-thread performance. The overall pattern is clear: Intel leads by roughly 20% to 66% depending on the workload, with the biggest wins in physics, prime number finding, and floating point math.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification field. Core count: 6 versus 8. Thread count: 12 versus 16. Base clock: 3.60 GHz versus 2.90 GHz. Boost clock: 4.40 GHz versus 5.20 GHz. Both have a 65 TDP, so power draw is identical on paper, but the Intel part delivers higher performance within that envelope.

Socket and platform differ completely. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel Core 5 223PE uses Intel Socket 1700. This means the two are not interchangeable in any system. L1 cache: 64 KB per core versus 80 KB per core. L2 cache: 512 KB per core versus 2 MB per core. L3 cache: 16 MB shared versus 24 MB shared. Memory support: DDR4 only versus DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: 51.2 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. ECC support: no versus yes. PCIe: Gen 3, 16 lanes versus Gen 5, 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: Radeon Vega 7 versus UHD Graphics 730.

The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part does not. The AMD part launched with an MSRP of $125, while the Intel part launched with an MSRP of $232. Release dates differ as well: the AMD part was released in January 2024, while the Intel part is dated March 2026. The AMD processor has a recorded transistor count of 10,700 million and a die size of 180 mm², while the Intel processor has no transistor or die size data in the database. The Intel part does support ECC memory, which the AMD part does not.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core 5 223PE outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT in every recorded benchmark, with margins ranging from 20% to 66%. The average benchmark score difference is substantial: 40585 versus 26748, a difference of 13837 points. The percentile ranking reflects this: 87th for Intel versus 79th for AMD.

The Intel part's advantages are structural. It has more cores, more threads, higher boost clock, larger caches, and higher memory bandwidth. It also supports newer memory standards and PCIe Gen 5. The AMD part's advantages are limited to a smaller process node, a lower launch MSRP, and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. For users who prioritize raw performance across rendering, math, compression, and physics workloads, the Intel Core 5 223PE is the clear choice according to the data.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT remains viable for users on the AM4 platform who need a 65-watt processor with Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics and cannot move to a newer socket. Its lower launch MSRP and unlocked multiplier are meaningful for specific builds. But in pure benchmark terms, it does not compete with the Intel part in any measured category.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PE wins in every benchmark category recorded. Its strongest advantages are in PassMark physics (66.3% ahead), PassMark find prime numbers (66% ahead), and PassMark floating point math (52% ahead). These workloads indicate the Intel part is particularly well suited to simulation, scientific computing, and any task with heavy mathematical computation. The Cinebench multi-core tests show a consistent 40.1% lead, making the Intel part the better choice for video rendering and 3D modeling workloads that scale with core count.

The Intel part also wins single-thread tests by 27.3% to 40.1%, which matters for everyday responsiveness, application launch times, and lightly threaded software. Its data compression lead of 29.6% and integer math lead of 35.7% indicate solid performance in file archiving, database operations, and general productivity. The 20% lead in data encryption shows it handles cryptographic workloads better as well.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT has no benchmark wins in this comparison. Its role is defined by platform and feature considerations rather than performance. It fits AM4 motherboards, uses DDR4 memory, and includes Radeon Vega 7 graphics. For users already on the AM4 platform with DDR4 memory, it represents a drop-in upgrade path. Its unlocked multiplier allows manual overclocking, which the locked Intel part does not permit. The data does not show any workload where the AMD part takes the lead, so selection should be based on platform compatibility and the lower launch MSRP rather than expected performance.