AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Intel Atom x7213RE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive sweep for the AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS across every shared benchmark. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Intel Atom x7213RE scores 226 against the AMD part’s 1226, a delta of -81.6%. That pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multicore, where the Atom manages 942 while the Ryzen 5 reaches 5111, again a -81.6% gap. The multicore performance difference is consistent and massive, driven by the Ryzen’s six cores and twelve threads versus the Atom’s two cores and two threads.

Single-core results show the same shape, though the raw numbers are smaller. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the Atom scores 132 while the Ryzen 5 scores 721, a -81.7% delta. Cinebench R23 tells the same story: 316 for the Atom versus 1718 for the Ryzen 5 in single-core, and 2244 versus 12171 in multicore. Both deltas sit at -81.6%. The Ryzen 5 wins all five head-to-head tests, leaving the Atom with zero wins in the comparison set.

The margins are large enough to classify this as a category difference rather than a close contest. The Atom’s highest single-core score, 316 in Cinebench R23, is roughly one-fifth of the Ryzen’s 1718. In multicore, the Atom’s best result, 2244, is less than one-fifth of the Ryzen’s 12171. The data indicates that any workload relying on CPU computation will favor the AMD part by a wide margin, regardless of thread count or clock frequency.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The Intel Atom x7213RE uses the Amston Lake architecture with Gracemont cores, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has two cores and two threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 3.40 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS uses Zen 2 architecture under the Renoir codename, fabricated by TSMC on a 7 nm process. It offers six cores and twelve threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The process node difference, 10 nm versus 7 nm, contributes to the Ryzen’s higher transistor density and efficiency, though the Atom’s lower TDP of 9 watts versus 35 watts shows the Intel part is tuned for a much lower power envelope.

Cache layouts diverge significantly. The Atom provides 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen 5 provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen’s larger total L2 (3 MB across six cores) and larger L3 give it a clear advantage in cache-sensitive workloads. The Atom’s L3 is shared across only two cores, so each core has more L3 per thread, but the absolute capacity is smaller.

Memory support also differs. The Atom supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a single-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Ryzen 5 supports only DDR4 but uses a dual-channel bus, achieving 68.3 GB/s. That bandwidth advantage is substantial for memory-bound tasks. Neither processor supports ECC memory. The Atom offers PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen 5 offers PCIe Gen 3 with no lane count specified in the database. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Atom has UHD Graphics 16EU, while the Ryzen 5 has Radeon RX Vega 6. The Ryzen’s integrated graphics are generally more capable, though the database does not provide direct GPU benchmark numbers for comparison.

Process node and foundry also differ: Intel fabricates the Atom in-house, while TSMC fabricates the Ryzen 5. The Ryzen 5’s transistor count is listed at 9,800 million, with a die size of 156 mm², while the Atom’s transistor count and die size are not recorded. Release dates are far apart: the Atom launched in April 2024, the Ryzen 5 in January 2020. The Atom’s launch MSRP is $42, recorded once here; the Ryzen 5 has no launch MSRP in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data points to a clear division of labor. The Ryzen 5 4600HS wins every recorded head-to-head test, covering Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multicore modes. That means for CPU-heavy tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, or any multi-threaded workload, the Ryzen 5 is the only viable option between the two. Its six cores and twelve threads, combined with a higher boost clock and dual-channel memory, produce results that are consistently 81% or more ahead of the Atom.

The Atom x7213RE has no benchmark wins in this comparison, but its specifications suggest a different role. With a TDP of 9 watts, it is designed for low-power, embedded, or fanless mobile systems where energy consumption is more critical than raw throughput. Its support for DDR5 memory, despite the single-channel bus, offers a modern memory interface. The Atom’s integrated UHD Graphics 16EU may suffice for basic display output, but the database does not provide GPU scores for comparison.

For light tasks such as web browsing, document editing, or lightweight scripting, the Atom could function adequately, but the data shows that even single-core performance falls far short of the Ryzen 5. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Atom scores 316 versus the Ryzen’s 1718, so even single-threaded responsiveness favors the AMD part. The Ryzen 5 also wins in memory bandwidth, with 68.3 GB/s versus 38.4 GB/s, which benefits any workload that streams data.

The practical winner is the Ryzen 5 for any compute-oriented use case. The Atom’s advantage lies only in power efficiency and possibly in systems where a 9-watt TDP is a hard requirement. But the benchmark record does not show any test where the Atom outperforms the Ryzen 5, whether in raw speed, memory throughput, or cache behavior.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS is far ahead. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 12171 versus the Intel Atom x7213RE’s 2244, a delta of -81.6%.

Q: Is the Intel Atom x7213RE competitive in single-core tests?

A: No. The Ryzen 5 4600HS beats it by a wide margin. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the Atom scores 132 while the Ryzen 5 scores 721, a -81.7% delta. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Atom scores 316 versus the Ryzen’s 1718.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Atom x7213RE has 2 cores and 2 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The Atom supports DDR4 and DDR5 in single-channel mode with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. The Ryzen 5 supports DDR4 in dual-channel mode with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which processor has a lower power draw?

A: The Intel Atom x7213RE has a TDP of 9 watts. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: Are there any benchmark tests where the Intel Atom wins?

A: No. In the head-to-head benchmark set, the AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS wins all five tests, covering Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multicore modes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Atom x7213RE | AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS |

|---------------|-------------------|--------------------|

| Cores | 2 | 6 |

| Threads | 2 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.40 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| TDP | 9 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | AMD Socket FP6 |

| Architecture | Amston Lake | Zen 2 |

| Codename | Amston Lake | Renoir |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 9,800 million |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 156 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (shared) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 68.3 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 9 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 16EU | Radeon RX Vega 6 |

| Release Date | 2024-04-07 | 2020-01-05 |

| Launch MSRP | $42 | Not recorded |

| Part Number | SRNEP | Not recorded |

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS wins every benchmark in the comparison set, with deltas of -81.6% or -81.7% across all five tests. It is faster in single-core and multicore workloads, has more cores and threads, higher clocks, a larger L3 cache, and double the memory bandwidth. For any task that relies on CPU performance, the Ryzen 5 is the correct choice.

The Intel Atom x7213RE has a place in systems where power consumption is the overriding constraint. Its 9-watt TDP is dramatically lower than the Ryzen’s 35 watts, making it suitable for battery-critical or passively cooled devices. It also supports DDR5 memory, which the Ryzen 5 does not. But the benchmark record shows no scenario where the Atom outperforms the Ryzen 5 in computational throughput.

Users who need a capable mobile processor for general productivity, content creation, or light gaming should select the Ryzen 5 4600HS based on its benchmark dominance. Users who require a low-power embedded processor for specialized, non-performance-critical roles may consider the Atom, but they must accept a large performance deficit in every measured category. The verdict from the database is clear: pick the Ryzen 5 for performance, pick the Atom only if power draw is the absolute priority.