AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X wins every recorded benchmark matchup against the AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE. The data shows a consistent, narrow margin across all six Cinebench tests, with the Threadripper leading by 5.8% in most cases. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Threadripper scores 1440 against 1361 for the 4600GE, a 5.8% advantage. The single-core R15 result follows the same pattern: 203 versus 192, a 5.7% lead.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the Threadripper maintains its edge. Multi-core shows 6000 against 5672, again 5.8% ahead. Single-core R20 delivers 846 versus 800, another 5.8% margin. The R23 results mirror this exactly: 14286 versus 13505 in multi-core, and 2016 versus 1906 in single-core, both 5.8% differences.

What stands out is the uniformity of the gap. Across every generation of the Cinebench suite, from R15 through R23, the Threadripper 1900X holds a lead between 5.7% and 5.8%. There is no test where the 4600GE closes the gap, and no test where the Threadripper extends its advantage beyond that narrow band. The 4600GE does have a higher boost clock on paper, but the benchmark results do not translate that into a win anywhere.

The average benchmark score reinforces the hierarchy. The Threadripper 1900X averages 4073 across its recorded tests, while the 4600GE averages 3906. That places the Threadripper in the 57th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with the 4600GE just behind at the 56th percentile. The nearest rivals for each chip also tell a similar story: the Threadripper sits within 1.2% of chips like the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X, while the 4600GE trades places with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS and the Intel Core i7-11700T within a 1.1% band.

Where Each One Wins

The Threadripper 1900X wins on raw compute output in every recorded benchmark. Its eight cores and sixteen threads give it a structural advantage that shows up consistently in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench multi-core results, where it leads by 5.8% in all three versions of the test, indicate that sustained multi-threaded rendering or similar parallel tasks will favor the Threadripper.

The 4600GE does not win any recorded benchmark, but the data does show where it is competitive. The margin is small enough, between 5.7% and 5.8% across the board, that the 4600GE's much lower power envelope becomes relevant in constrained environments. The 4600GE also includes integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics, a feature the Threadripper lacks entirely. For systems that need a display output without a separate graphics card, the 4600GE is the only option between these two.

The 4600GE also holds an advantage in memory bandwidth efficiency per watt, though the raw bandwidth numbers favor the Threadripper. The Threadripper's quad-channel DDR4 configuration delivers 85.3 GB/s, while the 4600GE's dual-channel setup provides 51.2 GB/s. The Threadripper's bandwidth advantage is substantial in absolute terms, but the 4600GE delivers its lower bandwidth at a fraction of the power draw.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras of AMD's design. The Threadripper 1900X uses the first-generation Zen architecture, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. The 4600GE uses the Zen 2 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference is significant: 14 nm versus 7 nm, which explains much of the power consumption gap.

The transistor counts are nearly identical, with the Threadripper at 9,600 million and the 4600GE at 9,800 million. However, the die layout differs fundamentally. The Threadripper uses two dies, each measuring 213 mm², for a combined die area of about 426 mm². The 4600GE uses a single 156 mm² die. That smaller die, on a more advanced process, delivers comparable performance at a fraction of the power.

Core and cache configurations also diverge. The Threadripper has eight cores and sixteen threads, with 96 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 per core. Its L3 cache is 32 MB. The 4600GE has six cores and twelve threads, with 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core. Its L3 cache is 8 MB shared. The Threadripper's larger L3 cache, four times the capacity, gives it an edge in workloads that repeatedly access large datasets.

The memory controllers differ as well. The Threadripper supports quad-channel DDR4 with a peak bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s. The 4600GE supports dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s. Both support DDR4 memory, and neither supports ECC. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Threadripper provides 60 CPU lanes of PCIe Gen 3, while the 4600GE offers standard PCIe Gen 3 without the same lane count.

The sockets are incompatible. The Threadripper uses AMD Socket SP3r2, while the 4600GE uses AMD Socket AM4. This means platform choice is a hard divider: the Threadripper requires a high-end desktop board, while the 4600GE fits mainstream AM4 boards. The Threadripper's launch MSRP was $549, while the 4600GE has no recorded launch MSRP. Both have unlocked multipliers, allowing overclocking on compatible boards.

The 4600GE includes integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics, which the Threadripper does not have. The Threadripper compensates with its massive PCIe lane count, which supports multiple discrete GPUs and other expansion cards. The 4600GE's integrated graphics make it suitable for compact or low-power builds where a discrete GPU is unnecessary.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has eight cores and sixteen threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE has six cores and twelve threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Threadripper 1900X scores 14286, while the 4600GE scores 13505. The Threadripper leads by 5.8%.

Q: Does the 4600GE have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the 4600GE includes Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics. The Threadripper 1900X has no integrated graphics.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Threadripper 1900X supports quad-channel DDR4 with 85.3 GB/s. The 4600GE supports dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The Threadripper 1900X has a TDP of 180 watts. The 4600GE has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: Are the two processors on the same socket?

A: No. The Threadripper 1900X uses AMD Socket SP3r2, while the 4600GE uses AMD Socket AM4.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion for raw performance: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the faster processor in every recorded benchmark. Across all six Cinebench tests, it leads by approximately 5.8%, with no exception. Its eight cores, sixteen threads, 32 MB L3 cache, and quad-channel memory bandwidth combine to deliver higher scores in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The percentile ranking, 57th versus 56th, and the average benchmark score, 4073 versus 3906, both confirm the Threadripper's overall advantage.

However, the verdict is not a simple recommendation for the Threadripper. The 4600GE wins on efficiency by a massive margin. Its 35 watt TDP compares to the Threadripper's 180 watts, a fivefold difference. The 4600GE also includes integrated graphics, which the Threadripper lacks, and uses a mainstream AM4 socket rather than the high-end SP3r2. For systems constrained by power, cooling, or space, the 4600GE is the practical choice despite losing every benchmark.

The benchmark margins are small enough that the difference may not matter in real-world use. A 5.8% lead in Cinebench translates to a modest advantage in actual rendering or productivity tasks. Users who need maximum throughput and have the platform budget for a Threadripper board should pick the 1900X. Users who want a low-power, all-in-one processor for a compact desktop should pick the 4600GE. The data shows the Threadripper wins on performance, but the 4600GE wins on versatility and efficiency.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base clock | 3.80 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.00 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| TDP | 180 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Zen | Zen 2 |

| Process node | 14 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |

| Die size | 2x 213 mm² | 156 mm² |

| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 32 MB | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 60 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Integrated graphics | None | Radeon Vega 7 |

| Launch MSRP | $549 | None recorded |