AMD Ryzen 5 4600G vs Intel Core i3-14100T Comparison

The Intel Core i3-14100T and AMD Ryzen 5 4600G are two low-power desktop processors aimed at different priorities. The data shows a clear split: the AMD chip wins 12 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, while the Intel chip takes 5. However, the nature of those wins matters more than the count. The Ryzen 5 4600G dominates heavily threaded workloads and memory-sensitive tasks, while the Core i3-14100T shows surprising strength in single-threaded performance and specific math workloads. Both land at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, but they achieve that ranking through entirely different means.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is the clear choice for multi-core and parallel workloads. In every Cinebench test — R15, R20, and R23 — the Ryzen 5 4600G leads by a consistent 14.5% to 14.6% margin. That pattern extends to PassMark's multithread test, where the AMD chip scores 15992 versus Intel's 13662, again a 14.6% gap. The 4600G also crushes the Intel part in data-heavy tasks: data compression (231426 vs 152636, a 34% lead), data encryption (13572 vs 7881, a 41.9% lead), and random string sorting (24246 vs 15579, a 35.7% lead). Integer math also favors AMD, with a score of 50723 versus 40292, a 20.6% advantage. If your work involves compression, encryption, or any task that scales with core count, the Ryzen 5 4600G is the stronger processor.

The Intel Core i3-14100T wins in a narrower but still meaningful set of scenarios. Its most significant victory is in single-threaded performance: the PassMark single-thread score is 3498 versus 2653, a 31.9% lead for Intel. That advantage shows up in the head-to-head data as a decisive edge. The Intel chip also wins the PassMark physics test by a huge margin (973 vs 676, 43.9% ahead), and it takes the find prime numbers test (56 vs 32, a 75% lead). Floating point math also slightly favors Intel (31379 vs 29947, 4.8% ahead). These results suggest the Core i3-14100T is better for lightly threaded applications, physics simulations, and specific computational tasks where per-core efficiency matters more than raw core count.

The Verdict

Pick the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G if your workloads are mostly multi-threaded. The 14.6% lead across all three Cinebench versions is a strong signal for rendering, video encoding, and compilation. The massive advantages in data compression (34%), encryption (41.9%), and random string sorting (35.7%) make it the obvious choice for file archiving, database work, or any data manipulation task. With 6 cores and 12 threads versus Intel's 4 cores and 8 threads, the Ryzen 5 4600G simply has more parallel resources to throw at demanding applications.

Pick the Intel Core i3-14100T if single-threaded performance is your priority. The 31.9% lead in PassMark single-thread is substantial, and the physics test win (43.9% ahead) suggests it handles simulation workloads better. The find prime numbers result (75% ahead) points to algorithmic efficiency in certain math tasks. For everyday responsiveness, web browsing, and older or lightly threaded games, the Intel chip's per-core strength will feel snappier. However, note that the Ryzen 5 4600G still wins the single-core Cinebench tests by 14.5%, which complicates the picture — the PassMark single-thread test may be measuring something different than Cinebench's single-core workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results are remarkably consistent. Across R15, R20, and R23, the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G wins both multi-core and single-core by nearly identical margins: 14.6% for multi-core and 14.5% for single-core in every version. The multi-core scores tell a clear story: 1370 vs 1170 in R15, 5709 vs 4877 in R20, and 13593 vs 11612 in R23. The single-core scores follow suit: 193 vs 165 in R15, 805 vs 688 in R20, and 1919 vs 1639 in R23. This consistency suggests the Ryzen 5 4600G has a fundamental architectural advantage in Cinebench's workload, regardless of core count.

PassMark tells a more nuanced story. The biggest AMD win is in data encryption, where it scores 13572 against Intel's 7881 — a 41.9% lead. Data compression is nearly as lopsided at 34% in AMD's favor. Random string sorting goes to AMD by 35.7%. These are memory-intensive operations, and the Ryzen 5 4600G's higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s versus no figure for Intel in the data) likely contributes. Integer math also favors AMD by 20.6%.

Intel's wins are concentrated but dramatic. The find prime numbers test shows Intel at 56 versus AMD's 32, a 75% advantage — the largest single delta in either direction. The physics test gives Intel a 43.9% lead (973 vs 676). Single-threaded PassMark goes to Intel by 31.9% (3498 vs 2653). Floating point math is a narrow Intel win at 4.8%. These results indicate that while AMD dominates in throughput, Intel's architecture handles certain specific instruction patterns much more efficiently.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G scores 13593, which is 14.6% ahead of the Intel Core i3-14100T's 11612.

Q: Does the Intel Core i3-14100T win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins 5 of 17 head-to-head tests. Its biggest wins are in PassMark find prime numbers (75% ahead), physics (43.9% ahead), and single-thread (31.9% ahead).

Q: Which CPU has better single-threaded performance?

A: It depends on the test. The Intel Core i3-14100T wins PassMark single-thread by 31.9%, but the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G wins Cinebench R23 single-core by 14.6%.

Q: How large is the gap in data compression?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G scores 231426 versus Intel's 152636, giving AMD a 34% advantage.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i3-14100T has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Are both processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both are at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores are very close: 17648 for Intel and 17507 for AMD.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different designs. The Intel Core i3-14100T uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G uses Zen 2 architecture on a 7 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 156 mm² and 9,800 million transistors. The process node advantage goes to AMD, which may explain some of its efficiency in parallel workloads.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and only 8 MB of shared L3. Despite having less cache per core and less total L3, the Ryzen 5 4600G still outperforms in multi-threaded tests, suggesting its larger core count compensates for the cache deficit.

Memory support also diverges. The Intel Core i3-14100T supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G supports only DDR4. The AMD chip lists a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s; no bandwidth figure is provided for Intel. Both use dual-channel memory buses. ECC memory is supported on the Intel chip but not on the AMD chip, which matters for certain workstation or server use cases.

The integrated graphics differ as well. Intel pairs the Core i3-14100T with UHD Graphics 730, while AMD uses Radeon Vega 7. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, whereas the Intel chip is locked. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G also has more PCIe bandwidth with Gen 3 and 20 lanes, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i3-14100T | AMD Ryzen 5 4600G |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 3.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | 156 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Max Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe Version | Gen 5 | Gen 3 |

| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20 |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Radeon Vega 7 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Launch MSRP | $134 | $154 |

The Intel chip runs at a lower TDP of 35 W versus AMD's 65 W, making it more power-efficient on paper. The AMD chip has a higher base clock (3.70 GHz vs 2.70 GHz) but a lower boost clock (4.20 GHz vs 4.40 GHz). The Intel part supports newer PCIe Gen 5, while AMD offers more Gen 3 lanes. Both are actively produced, with Intel released on 2024-01-07 and AMD on 2020-07-20. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking; the Intel part does not.