AMD Ryzen 5 4600G vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Core 7 150U
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 4600G vs Intel Core 7 150U
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Core 7 150U are both 71st-percentile CPUs, but they achieve that standing through entirely different strategies. The Ryzen 5 4600G is a desktop part with a 65W TDP and 6 cores, while the Core 7 150U is a mobile chip with a 15W TDP and 10 cores. Benchmark results show a near-even split, with the AMD chip taking 10 wins and Intel taking 9. The deciding factor is workload type: the Ryzen 5 4600G dominates heavily threaded compute and data processing, while the Core 7 150U excels at short-burst single-threaded tasks and physics simulations.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The most dramatic gap appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G scores 13593 against Intel’s 8883. That is a 53% advantage, the largest single delta in the entire comparison. This result is consistent with the Cinebench R20 multi-core test, where AMD wins 5709 to 5248, an 8.8% edge. The pattern flips in Cinebench R15 multi-core, however, where Intel takes the win 1505.5 to 1370, a 9% margin. The older R15 test favors Intel’s architecture, but the newer R20 and R23 workloads clearly reward AMD’s higher sustained power envelope.
Single-core results are split by generation of the test. In Cinebench R15 single-core, Intel wins decisively at 254 versus 193, a 24% lead. Geekbench single-core also goes to Intel, with 1857 against 1460, a 21.4% margin. PassMark single-thread shows the same story at 3508 versus 2653, another 24.4% advantage. Yet in Cinebench R20 single-core, AMD wins 805 to 740 (8.8%), and in R23 single-core, AMD edges ahead 1919 to 1875.5 (2.3%). This suggests Intel’s peak clock advantage of 5.40 GHz matters more in short, older workloads, while AMD’s 4.20 GHz boost holds up better in modern sustained single-thread tests.
Data-heavy PassMark tests heavily favor the AMD chip. Data compression shows AMD at 231426 versus 158622, a 45.9% win. Data encryption goes to AMD 13572 to 10025, a 35.4% margin. Extended instructions are AMD’s biggest non-Cinebench win: 15280 versus 8748, a 74.7% advantage. Random string sorting also favors AMD, 24246 to 18269, a 32.7% lead. PassMark multi-thread overall gives AMD the win at 15992 versus 14700, an 8.8% margin.
Intel fights back in math and physics workloads. PassMark floating point math goes to Intel 34405 to 29947, a 13% win. Integer math is nearly tied, with Intel winning 51057 to 50723, just 0.7% ahead. The most lopsided Intel victory is in PassMark physics, where the Core 7 150U scores 1012 against 676, a 33.2% margin. Find prime numbers also favors Intel, 58 to 32, a 44.8% difference. These results suggest Intel’s per-core efficiency at low power is exceptional for certain algorithmic tasks.
The Verdict
The data points to a clear split based on use case. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is the better choice for sustained multi-core rendering, data compression, encryption, and any workload that can use 12 threads over a long period. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13593 is 53% higher, and its PassMark extended instructions score is 74.7% higher. Gamers and content creators running long exports should pick the AMD part.
The Intel Core 7 150U is the better choice for bursty, single-threaded tasks and physics-heavy applications. Its Geekbench single-core score of 1857 is 21.4% higher, and its PassMark physics score of 1012 is 33.2% higher. The 24% lead in PassMark single-thread and Cinebench R15 single-core indicates snappier responsiveness in lightly threaded software. Mobile users who need battery life and quick task switching will prefer Intel.
Both CPUs sit at the 71st percentile, and their average benchmark scores are close: 17507 for AMD versus 17395 for Intel. The delta is just 0.6%, which places each chip within the other’s nearest rival list. The Ryzen 5 4600G is 0.6% ahead of the Core 7 150U on average, but that gap is negligible. The real differentiator is workload type, not overall performance.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G uses the Zen 2 architecture on a 7 nm TSMC process, with a 156 mm² die containing 9,800 million transistors. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with base and boost clocks of 3.70 GHz and 4.20 GHz. The cache layout is 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR4 only, dual-channel, with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. It runs on AMD Socket AM4 and supports PCIe Gen 3 with 20 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 7, and the multiplier is unlocked.
The Intel Core 7 150U uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process. It has 10 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache is larger per core: 80 KB L1, 1.25 MB L2, and 12 MB shared L3. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, though no memory bandwidth figure is listed. It uses Intel BGA 1744 socket and PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, and the multiplier is locked. The TDP difference is stark: 65W for AMD versus 15W for Intel.
The transistor count and die size are not listed for Intel, but the process node difference is significant. AMD’s 7 nm process allows for a denser, more power-hungry design, while Intel’s 10 nm process focuses on low power efficiency. The Intel chip has 4 more cores but only 12 threads, matching AMD’s thread count, which indicates a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores. The cache hierarchy favors Intel in total L3 (12 MB versus 8 MB) and per-core L2 (1.25 MB versus 512 KB), but AMD’s higher TDP allows it to sustain higher clocks under load.
FAQ
Q: Which CPU has a higher multi-core score in Cinebench R23?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G scores 13593, which is 53% higher than the Intel Core 7 150U’s 8883.
Q: How much faster is the Intel Core 7 150U in single-threaded PassMark?
A: Intel scores 3508 versus AMD’s 2653, a 24.4% advantage in the PassMark single-thread test.
Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G has a 65W TDP, while the Intel Core 7 150U has a 15W TDP.
Q: Do both CPUs support the same memory types?
A: No. The AMD chip supports DDR4 only, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5.
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G has 6 cores and 12 threads. They have equal thread counts.
Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G has an average score of 17507, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core 7 150U’s 17395.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is the clear winner in multi-core rendering and data processing. It wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 53%, Cinebench R20 multi-core by 8.8%, Geekbench multi-core by 6.5%, and PassMark multi-thread by 8.8%. For data compression, it wins by 45.9%; for encryption, by 35.4%; for extended instructions, by 74.7%; and for random string sorting, by 32.7%. Any workload that uses all 12 threads for an extended period will favor AMD.
The Intel Core 7 150U wins in single-threaded responsiveness and physics. It takes Cinebench R15 single-core by 24%, Geekbench single-core by 21.4%, PassMark single-thread by 24.4%, and Cinebench R15 multi-core by 9%. Physics simulation is a major win at 33.2%, and floating point math goes to Intel by 13%. Prime number finding is also Intel’s, at 44.8% ahead. Integer math is effectively a tie, with Intel ahead by just 0.7%.
For users on a desktop with power to spare, the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G offers the best multi-core throughput. Its 65W TDP and unlocked multiplier allow for overclocking, which the Intel chip does not support. For laptop users, the Intel Core 7 150U’s 15W TDP and higher boost clock deliver better short-burst performance while consuming far less power. The choice is not about which is faster overall, but which workload pattern matches the hardware.