AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs Intel Xeon D-1746TER Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Xeon D-1746TER
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs Intel Xeon D-1746TER
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X and Intel Xeon D-1746TER occupy different corners of the processor market, yet the benchmark data places them in the same performance percentile. The Ryzen is a desktop part with a 75th percentile ranking, while the Xeon is a server/workstation chip that also sits at the 75th percentile. Their average benchmark scores are 21992 and 21635 respectively, a narrow gap that hides very different strengths.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Xeon D-1746TER has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X boosts to 4.40 GHz, compared to the Xeon's 3.10 GHz.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The Intel Xeon D-1746TER supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X does not.
Q: Which processor has the higher memory bandwidth?
A: The Intel Xeon D-1746TER has a triple-channel memory bus with 64.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Ryzen uses dual-channel with 51.2 GB/s.
Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmarks?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X wins 15 of 17 tests, including all Cinebench runs and most Passmark workloads.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of each?
A: The Ryzen 5 3600X has a launch MSRP of $249, and the Xeon D-1746TER has a launch MSRP of $1069.
The Verdict
The data points to a clear split. For desktop workloads, the Ryzen 5 3600X is the stronger choice: it wins 15 of 17 head-to-head tests, including every Cinebench run and the Passmark single-thread test by 48.4%. Its higher boost clock and larger L3 cache contribute to these results. The Xeon D-1746TER, however, is the pick for server and workstation environments where ECC memory, triple-channel bandwidth, and a lower 67 W TDP matter more than raw single-thread speed. Its 10 cores and 20 threads provide more parallel capacity, and it leads in floating point math by 10.5% and integer math by 8.3%. If you need a desktop processor, the Ryzen is the obvious winner. If you need a low-power server chip with ECC, the Xeon is the one.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 3600X dominates the Cinebench suite. In R15 multi-core it scores 1555 against 1341, a 16% lead. Single-core R15 is 219 vs 189, a 15.9% advantage. R20 multi-core shows 6480 vs 5590, again 15.9%. R23 multi-core is 15430 vs 13311, and single-core 2178 vs 1879, both 15.9%. The Passmark suite shows even larger gaps. Data encryption is 14255 vs 9343, a 52.6% win. Find prime numbers is 110 vs 68, a 61.8% margin. Single-thread performance is 2649 vs 1785, a 48.4% lead. Physics is 1186 vs 859, a 38.1% advantage. Data compression is 224318 vs 191594, a 17.1% win. Extended instructions are 14773 vs 12620, also 17.1%. Multithread is 18154 vs 15660, a 15.9% lead. Random string sorting is 24343 vs 23732, a narrow 2.6% win.
The Xeon fights back in two Passmark tests. Floating point math is 32772 vs 29339, a 10.5% lead for Intel. Integer math is 54482 vs 49934, an 8.3% advantage. These are the only two tests where the Xeon comes out ahead.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every specification. The Ryzen has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Xeon has 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 3.80 GHz for the Ryzen and 2000 MHz for the Xeon. Boost clocks are 4.40 GHz and 3.10 GHz. TDP is 95 W for the Ryzen and 67 W for the Xeon. The Ryzen uses AMD Socket AM4, the Xeon uses Intel BGA 2227. The Ryzen is built on TSMC's 7 nm process, the Xeon on Intel's 10 nm. The Ryzen has 3,800 million transistors on a 74 mm² die; the Xeon's transistor count and die size are not recorded. Cache differs: the Ryzen has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3; the Xeon has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 15 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR4 for both, but the Ryzen uses dual-channel with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the Xeon uses triple-channel with 64.0 GB/s. ECC memory is supported only on the Xeon. PCIe is Gen 4 for both, but the Xeon has 16 lanes (CPU only) while the Ryzen's lane count is not specified. The Ryzen is a desktop part, the Xeon is server/workstation. The Ryzen has an unlocked multiplier, the Xeon is locked. The Ryzen launched on 2019-07-06 with a launch MSRP of $249; the Xeon launched on 2022-02-23 with a launch MSRP of $1069. The Ryzen's part number is 100-000000022, the Xeon's is SRM1B.
Architecture Differences
The Ryzen 5 3600X is based on Zen 2, codenamed Matisse, and is part of the 3000 series. It uses a 7 nm process from TSMC. The Xeon D-1746TER is based on Ice Lake, specifically Ice Lake-D, and uses Intel's 10 nm process. The Ryzen has a larger L3 cache at 32 MB shared, while the Xeon has 15 MB shared. The Xeon's L1 and L2 caches are larger per core: 80 KB and 1.25 MB versus 64 KB and 512 KB. The Xeon supports ECC memory and triple-channel DDR4, while the Ryzen does not support ECC and uses dual-channel. The Xeon's PCIe implementation is limited to 16 lanes for CPU, while the Ryzen's PCIe Gen 4 support is not quantified. The Ryzen has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Xeon is locked. The Ryzen is a desktop processor, the Xeon is designed for server and workstation use. The Xeon has a lower TDP of 67 W compared to the Ryzen's 95 W, despite having more cores, which reflects its server-oriented power profile.