AMD Ryzen 5 3501U vs Intel Core 3 100HL Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the two processors compare in overall average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U records an average benchmark score of 14320, placing it at the 69th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 3 100HL records an average benchmark score of 23545, placing it at the 76th percentile. The Intel part holds a substantial lead in the aggregate data.

Q: Which processor wins the single-thread performance test?

A: The Intel Core 3 100HL wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 3735, compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U's score of 2136. The delta shows the AMD part trailing by 42.8 percent.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the Intel Core 3 100HL has 8 cores and 12 threads. The Intel processor also has a higher boost clock at 4.60 GHz versus 3.70 GHz.

Q: Which processor shows a larger advantage in multi-threaded workload performance?

A: The Intel Core 3 100HL leads the PassMark multi-thread test with a score of 17586 against the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U's 7071. The delta indicates the AMD processor is 59.8 percent behind in this test.

Q: What are the memory support options for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U supports DDR4 memory only. The Intel Core 3 100HL supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both processors use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP rating?

A: The Intel Core 3 100HL has a TDP of 45 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U has a TDP of 15 watts. The AMD part is rated for a much lower power envelope.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear split in intended use cases. The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U is a 15-watt mobile processor built on the Picasso architecture with 4 cores and 4 threads. Its average benchmark score of 14320 and 69th percentile ranking place it in a lower performance tier. The Intel Core 3 100HL, a 45-watt desktop part with 8 cores and 12 threads, delivers an average score of 23545 and sits at the 76th percentile. For users who prioritize raw throughput in multi-threaded tasks, compression, encryption, and floating-point math, the Intel processor wins every recorded head-to-head benchmark.

The AMD part does not win a single benchmark in the comparison set. Its strengths lie elsewhere: a 15-watt TDP, a 12 nm process node, and a 4 MB shared L3 cache. The data suggests it is suited for power-constrained mobile systems where efficiency matters more than peak performance. The Intel Core 3 100HL, with its 45-watt TDP and 12 MB shared L3 cache, is a desktop part that trades power for significantly higher performance across all measured categories. The benchmark results indicate that the Intel processor is the clear choice for compute-heavy desktop workloads, while the AMD processor fits scenarios where low power consumption is the primary constraint.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 3 100HL dominates every recorded PassMark benchmark against the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U. The largest margin appears in extended instructions, where Intel scores 12463 versus AMD's 3274, a delta of 73.7 percent in Intel's favor. Floating-point math shows a similarly wide gap: Intel scores 42108, AMD scores 12707, a 69.8 percent difference. Integer math follows with Intel at 56308 and AMD at 26321, a 53.3 percent lead for Intel.

Multi-threaded performance shows Intel ahead by 59.8 percent, scoring 17586 against AMD's 7071. The physics test shows a 48 percent gap, with Intel at 928 and AMD at 483. Data compression reveals Intel at 202225 versus AMD's 87380, a 56.8 percent difference. Data encryption shows Intel at 11964 and AMD at 5580, a 53.4 percent gap. Random string sorting has Intel at 23223 and AMD at 10414, a 55.2 percent margin. Find prime numbers shows Intel at 48 and AMD at 21, a 56.2 percent difference.

Single-thread performance also favors Intel heavily. The PassMark single-thread test records Intel at 3735 and AMD at 2136, a 42.8 percent lead. This consistency across every test, from memory-heavy operations to compute-bound tasks, indicates that the Intel Core 3 100HL delivers a uniformly higher performance level. The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U has zero wins in the head-to-head set, with all 11 benchmarks going to Intel.

Specification Differences

The core configuration differs significantly. The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U offers 4 cores and 4 threads, while the Intel Core 3 100HL offers 8 cores and 12 threads. The boost clock also favors Intel: 4.60 GHz versus 3.70 GHz, though both share the same base clock of 2.10 GHz. The TDP difference is substantial, with AMD at 15 watts and Intel at 45 watts.

Memory support diverges as well. AMD supports DDR4 only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part lists a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s, while the Intel part does not record a bandwidth figure. PCIe generation differs: AMD uses Gen 3, while Intel uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the CPU only. The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U uses AMD Socket FP5, while the Intel Core 3 100HL uses Intel Socket 1700.

The cache hierarchy differs in structure. AMD lists L1 cache as 96 KB per core, L2 as 512 KB per core, and L3 as 4 MB shared. Intel lists L1 as 80 KB per core, L2 as 2 MB per core, and L3 as 12 MB shared. The market segment differs: AMD is classified as mobile, Intel as desktop. Release dates also differ, with AMD recorded as 2026-05-31 and Intel as 2024-04-07. Neither part has a launch MSRP in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U belongs to the 3000 series and uses the Picasso codename, with the generation listed as Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Picasso)). It is built on a 12 nm process node at GlobalFoundries, with 4,940 million transistors and a die size of 210 mm². The Intel Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-PS, listed as Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS). It is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel, with no transistor count or die size recorded in the database.

The integrated graphics differ. AMD uses Radeon Vega 8, while Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 48EU. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The generation labels reflect different architectural generations: Zen+ for AMD and Raptor Lake-PS for Intel. The process node difference, 12 nm versus 10 nm, contributes to the distinct power and performance profiles. The AMD part also lacks ECC memory support, as does the Intel part.

The Intel processor's larger L3 cache, 12 MB shared versus 4 MB shared, and larger L2 per core, 2 MB versus 512 KB, align with its higher core count and desktop positioning. The AMD part's smaller cache and lower TDP align with its mobile segment classification. The architecture differences explain the benchmark outcomes: the Intel part's newer process node, higher core count, and larger caches produce consistent wins across all recorded tests. The AMD part's older Zen+ architecture and 12 nm node constrain its performance ceiling, particularly in multi-threaded and floating-point workloads.