AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE vs Intel Xeon E-2224G Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE and the Intel Xeon E-2224G occupy different corners of the desktop and workstation market, yet they share a core count and a dual-channel DDR4 memory interface. The recorded benchmark data shows a consistent pattern across every Cinebench iteration, with the AMD part taking a clear lead in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Intel Xeon, meanwhile, brings ECC memory support and a higher boost clock, but its benchmark scores trail in every measured test. This analysis breaks down the head-to-head results, the architectural choices behind them, and which processor the data favors for specific use cases.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE wins all six recorded Cinebench comparisons, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G records zero victories. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the AMD part scores 757 against 644 for the Xeon, a lead of 17.5%. The single-core R15 test shows a nearly identical margin, with the Ryzen scoring 106 and the Xeon 90, a difference of 17.8%. That consistency is notable because single-core performance is often where Intel traditionally holds an edge, but here the data shows the opposite.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the pattern holds. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE scores 3158 in multicore, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G manages 2687, again a 17.5% advantage. In R20 single-core, the AMD part scores 445 versus 379 for the Xeon, a 17.4% gap. The similarity of these margins across different Cinebench versions suggests a stable, workload-independent performance difference rather than a test-specific anomaly.

Cinebench R23 repeats the story. The AMD processor scores 7520 in multicore, compared to 6398 for the Intel part, a 17.5% lead. In single-core R23, the AMD scores 1061 against 903, a 17.5% gap. Every head-to-head metric points the same direction, and the margins cluster tightly between 17.4% and 17.8%. This is not a case where one chip wins some tests and loses others; the Ryzen simply outperforms the Xeon in every recorded Cinebench workload.

The database also includes Geekbench scores for the Intel Xeon E-2224G, with 4299 in multicore and 1535 in single-core, but no corresponding Geekbench result exists for the AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE in the recorded data, so a direct comparison on that test is not possible. Looking at the broader averages, the AMD part has an average benchmark score of 2175, placing it at the 47th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Xeon E-2224G has an average score of 2117, at the 46th percentile. The 58-point difference in average score is modest, but the head-to-head Cinebench results show a much larger, consistent margin. The Ryzen's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i5-1145G7E at 2174 (a 0.1% difference) and the Intel Core i7-1185GRE at 2178 (a 0.1% difference in the other direction), while the Xeon's nearest rivals include the Intel Atom C5125 at 2122 and the Intel Core i7-1160G7 at 2124. These surrounding scores place both processors in a similar performance tier overall, yet the direct Cinebench comparisons favor the AMD chip decisively.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE uses the Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, manufactured on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It integrates 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The Intel Xeon E-2224G uses the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically Coffee Lake-S WS, on Intel's 14 nm process, with a die size of 126 mm² and no transistor count listed in the database. The node difference is small in process generation terms, but the architectural approaches diverge significantly.

Core and thread counts are a key differentiator. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE has 4 cores and 8 threads, enabled by simultaneous multithreading. The Intel Xeon E-2224G has 4 cores and 4 threads, with no hyper-threading support. In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD part can process twice as many threads, which helps explain its consistent 17.5% multicore advantage in Cinebench tests despite the Intel chip's higher clock speeds. The base clock on the Xeon is 3.50 GHz versus 3.30 GHz on the Ryzen, and the boost clock is 4.70 GHz versus 4.00 GHz, so the Intel part has a substantial frequency advantage. Yet the benchmark results indicate that the Ryzen's extra threads and architectural efficiency overcome that frequency gap in Cinebench.

Cache configurations also differ. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. The Intel Xeon E-2224G has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Xeon has twice the L3 capacity, but the Ryzen has larger L1 and L2 caches per core. Memory bandwidth favors the AMD part, with 46.9 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for the Xeon, both over dual-channel DDR4.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE includes a Radeon RX Vega 11 GPU, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G includes HD Graphics P630. The database does not include graphics benchmarks, so no performance comparison is possible, but the GPU choice reflects the different market positioning. The Ryzen is a desktop part with a consumer-oriented iGPU, while the Xeon targets server and workstation use with a more basic graphics solution.

The Xeon E-2224G supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Ryzen 5 3400GE. The Intel part also has a 71 W TDP compared to 35 W for the AMD part, meaning the Ryzen delivers higher benchmark scores while drawing less power by the rated TDP. The Ryzen has an unlocked multiplier, while the Xeon is locked. Socket compatibility differs: the AMD part uses Socket AM4, the Intel part uses Socket 1151. The Ryzen remains in active production, while the Xeon E-2224G is marked end-of-life. The Xeon has a recorded launch MSRP of $213, while no launch MSRP is listed for the Ryzen.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to the AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE as the stronger performer in every recorded Cinebench test. It leads by roughly 17.5% in both single-core and multi-core workloads across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23. For users who prioritize raw Cinebench rendering performance, the choice is clear from the data alone. The Ryzen also does this at a 35 W TDP, which is roughly half the 71 W TDP of the Xeon, making it the more power-efficient option by the rated specifications.

The Intel Xeon E-2224G, however, is not without its own advantages. It supports ECC memory, which matters for systems where data integrity is critical, such as file servers or workstation builds that require error-correcting memory. It also has a higher boost clock at 4.70 GHz, although that does not translate into a benchmark win in the recorded data. The Xeon is a server and workstation segment part, while the Ryzen is a desktop part, so the platform context may matter more than raw Cinebench scores for some buyers.

For users who need ECC memory support and are locked into an Intel Socket 1151 platform, the Xeon E-2224G remains a viable option despite its lower scores. For users who want better Cinebench performance, a lower TDP, and an unlocked multiplier, the Ryzen 5 3400GE is the better choice according to the recorded measurements. The data does not support choosing the Xeon on performance grounds alone, since it loses every head-to-head test. The decision should rest on platform requirements, ECC needs, and the specific workload outside of Cinebench.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE scores 1061 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G scores 903. The AMD part leads by 17.5%.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2224G support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Xeon E-2224G supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE does not.

Q: How many threads does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Xeon E-2224G has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE has a TDP of 35 W, while the Intel Xeon E-2224G has a TDP of 71 W.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2224G has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE's boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE has an average benchmark score of 2175, ranking at the 47th percentile. The Intel Xeon E-2224G has an average score of 2117, ranking at the 46th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE wins in every recorded Cinebench workload. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 757 versus 644, and in R15 single-core it scores 106 versus 90. In R20, the margins are 3158 versus 2687 for multicore and 445 versus 379 for single-core. In R23, the AMD scores 7520 versus 6398 for multicore and 1061 versus 903 for single-core. These results make the Ryzen the clear choice for Cinebench-based rendering tasks, whether the workload uses one core or all available threads. The 8-thread capability gives it an advantage in multi-threaded scenarios, while its single-core scores also lead, so there is no workload category within Cinebench where the Xeon takes the win.

The Intel Xeon E-2224G wins in areas not covered by the benchmark scores. It supports ECC memory, making it suitable for server and workstation builds that require error-correcting memory for data reliability. It has a higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz, which could benefit lightly threaded tasks that are not captured in the Cinebench results, though the recorded single-core Cinebench scores do not reflect an advantage. The Xeon also has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 4 MB on the Ryzen, which may help in certain cache-sensitive workloads. Its production status is end-of-life, while the Ryzen is still active, so long-term availability favors the AMD part.

For users building a system where ECC memory is mandatory, the Xeon E-2224G is the only option of the two, since the Ryzen lacks ECC support. For users building a desktop system focused on rendering performance, lower power consumption, and overclocking flexibility due to the unlocked multiplier, the Ryzen 5 3400GE is the stronger pick. The recorded data shows the Ryzen ahead in every benchmark test, so the Xeon's case rests entirely on platform features rather than measured performance.