AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE vs Intel Core i5-10200H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE and the Intel Core i5-10200H are a study in contrast: a low-power desktop part versus a mobile processor, yet both land in the same performance percentile. The data shows the Ryzen 5 3400GE wins every single head-to-head benchmark, with a consistent 10.7% lead in multi-core tests. However, the Intel chip counters with a higher boost clock and a larger L3 cache, making the final choice heavily dependent on the user’s platform and power constraints. The Verdict is clear from the benchmark data: the Ryzen 5 3400GE is the stronger performer in raw compute, but the i5-10200H offers a distinct architectural profile that may suit different system requirements.

The Verdict

Benchmark results indicate that the AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE is the outright winner in every measured workload, taking all six head-to-head tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen scores 7520 against the Intel’s 6795, a 10.7% advantage. This pattern repeats across all Cinebench versions: R15 multi-core (757 vs 684), R20 multi-core (3158 vs 2853), and single-core tests show a nearly identical 10.6-10.7% lead. The Ryzen’s average benchmark score of 2175 also edges out the Intel’s 2154, and both CPUs sit at the 47th percentile among all CPUs, meaning they are direct peers in overall performance distribution.

The choice between these two is not about performance—the data is unanimous—but about platform. The Ryzen 5 3400GE is a desktop part on AMD Socket AM4 with a 35W TDP and unlocked multiplier, while the Intel Core i5-10200H is a mobile chip on Intel BGA 1440 with a 45W TDP and locked multiplier. The Ryzen is the pick for users building or upgrading a desktop system who want maximum compute per watt. The Intel is the only option for laptops requiring its specific socket, despite its lower benchmark scores. The data does not support choosing the Intel for performance reasons; it only makes sense when the motherboard or system dictates its use.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE wins all multi-core benchmarks. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 7520 versus the Intel’s 6795, a 10.7% difference. The same 10.7% delta appears in Cinebench R15 (757 vs 684) and R20 (3158 vs 2853).

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-10200H have any single-core advantage?

A: No. The data shows the Ryzen 5 3400GE wins single-core tests too. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Ryzen scores 1061 against the Intel’s 959, a 10.6% lead. The R15 single-core result is 106 vs 96, and R20 is 445 vs 402, both with a 10.7% advantage for AMD.

Q: How do their overall performance scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE has an average benchmark score of 2175, while the Intel Core i5-10200H averages 2154. Both CPUs occupy the 47th percentile in the global CPU ranking, indicating they are statistically similar in overall performance despite the AMD’s head-to-head sweep.

Q: What are the TDP differences and what do they imply?

A: The Ryzen 5 3400GE has a 35W TDP, while the Intel Core i5-10200H is rated at 45W. This means the AMD part delivers better performance at a lower power envelope, which is notable for compact desktop builds or systems where thermal output matters.

Q: Can the Intel chip be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier unlocked field is false for the Intel Core i5-10200H. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE, in contrast, has an unlocked multiplier, allowing manual overclocking on compatible AM4 motherboards.

Q: What memory types do they support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE supports DDR4 only. The Intel Core i5-10200H supports both DDR3 and DDR4. Both run dual-channel memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE uses the Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, built on GlobalFoundries’ 12 nm process. It integrates 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-10200H uses the Comet Lake architecture (Comet Lake-H), built on Intel’s 14 nm process, though the FACT PACK does not list its transistor count or die size. This process difference is significant: the AMD chip packs more transistors into a smaller node, which likely contributes to its higher benchmark scores despite a lower boost clock.

Cache hierarchies also differ notably. The Ryzen 5 3400GE has 96 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 4 MB of shared L3. The Intel Core i5-10200H has smaller L1 (64 KB per core) and L2 (256 KB per core) caches, but a larger 6 MB shared L3. The Intel’s larger L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB) does not translate into a performance win in the data, suggesting the Zen+ architecture’s caching strategy is more effective for these workloads. Both support PCIe Gen 3, but the AMD chip is socketed (AM4) while the Intel is soldered (BGA 1440), reflecting their desktop versus mobile market segments.

The integrated graphics differ as well: the Ryzen 5 3400GE features Radeon RX Vega 11, while the Intel Core i5-10200H has UHD Graphics. The FACT PACK does not include iGPU benchmark data, so no performance comparison can be made, but the presence of Vega-class graphics on a 35W part is a notable architectural choice.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are identical: both have 4 cores and 8 threads. The key specification differences start with clock speeds. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The Intel Core i5-10200H has a lower base of 2.40 GHz but a higher boost of 4.10 GHz. This 0.10 GHz boost advantage for Intel does not help in benchmarks, as the AMD chip consistently outperforms it.

Power consumption is a major differentiator. The AMD part has a 35W TDP, while the Intel part is rated at 45W. This 10W difference is substantial for thermal design. The AMD chip also has an unlocked multiplier (true), whereas the Intel multiplier is locked. The sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket AM4 versus Intel BGA 1440.

Memory support differs: the AMD chip supports DDR4 only, while the Intel chip supports both DDR3 and DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory with identical 46.9 GB/s bandwidth. Neither supports ECC memory. Both use PCIe Gen 3. The release dates differ by over a year: the AMD launched on 2019-07-06, while the Intel launched on 2020-09-16. The AMD’s part number is YD3400C6M4MFH, and the Intel’s is SRK3X.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data is remarkably consistent: the AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE wins all six tests with deltas between 10.4% and 10.7%. The biggest wins are in multi-core tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD scores 757 against Intel’s 684, a 10.7% margin. The R20 multi-core test shows 3158 vs 2853, also a 10.7% delta. The R23 multi-core test, the most modern workload, shows 7520 vs 6795, again a 10.7% win for AMD.

Single-core results are nearly identical in percentage terms. The AMD wins R15 single-core 106 vs 96 (10.4%), R20 single-core 445 vs 402 (10.7%), and R23 single-core 1061 vs 959 (10.6%). The consistency of these deltas suggests a systemic architectural advantage for Zen+ over Comet Lake in Cinebench workloads, rather than a workload-specific quirk.

The Intel Core i5-10200H’s only benchmark advantage appears in Geekbench tests, where it scores 4096 multi-core and 1347 single-core. However, the FACT PACK does not list Geekbench scores for the AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE, so a direct comparison cannot be made. In the head-to-head tests that are available, the Intel wins zero out of six.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE wins in every measured category: multi-core rendering, single-core responsiveness, and overall average score. The Cinebench suite—which stresses both multi-threaded and single-threaded performance—shows a 10.4-10.7% advantage for AMD across the board. This makes the Ryzen 5 3400GE the clear choice for users prioritizing raw CPU performance in applications like 3D rendering, video encoding, or any workload that scales with Cinebench scores. Its lower 35W TDP and unlocked multiplier also make it attractive for overclocking in a desktop system, provided the user has an AM4 motherboard.

The Intel Core i5-10200H does not win any head-to-head benchmark, but it has its own domain: mobile computing. Being a BGA 1440 part, it is designed for laptops where the socket is not user-replaceable. Its higher 4.10 GHz boost clock and larger 6 MB L3 cache may offer benefits in specific workloads not represented in the Cinebench suite, though the data does not capture such scenarios. The Intel chip also supports DDR3 memory, which could be relevant for legacy system designs. The Geekbench scores (4096 multi-core, 1347 single-core) exist for the Intel but not the AMD, so users comparing via Geekbench would need to rely on other sources. In the absence of those AMD scores, the Intel’s Geekbench numbers cannot be directly compared, but they do not overturn the Cinebench results.

The wins split is stark: AMD wins 6, Intel wins 0. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE is the superior processor in all tested aspects. The Intel Core i5-10200H is only the winner in the sense of being the right tool for a laptop motherboard that requires its specific BGA 1440 socket, and even then, its performance is measurably lower. The data leaves no room for ambiguity: for any workload captured by Cinebench, the Ryzen 5 3400GE is the faster part, and the Intel chip’s only path to relevance is its mobile form factor.