AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Intel Core i7-4710HQ Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-4710HQ has an average benchmark score of 1473, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has an average score of 1439. The Intel part is slightly ahead by 0.6% when compared to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5.

Q: How do the two chips compare in multi-core rendering performance?

A: In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G scores 846.5 versus the Intel Core i7-4710HQ's 472. This represents a 44.2% advantage for AMD in this specific test, which is a substantial margin.

Q: What is the difference in their single-core performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 2400G leads by 57.6% in Cinebench R15 single-core, scoring 155.65 against the i7-4710HQ's 66. In Geekbench single-core, the margin narrows to 5.6%, with scores of 1003 and 947 respectively.

Q: Which processor has a higher transistor count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G contains 4,950 million transistors, while the Intel Core i7-4710HQ has 1,400 million. The AMD chip uses a 14 nm process from GlobalFoundries, whereas Intel uses a 22 nm process.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel Core i7-4710HQ is locked. This gives the AMD part flexibility for tuning that the Intel chip lacks.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports DDR4 with a dual-channel bus and achieves 46.9 GB/s. The Intel Core i7-4710HQ supports DDR3 with a dual-channel bus and achieves 25.5 GB/s. AMD's platform offers significantly higher theoretical memory throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design eras and philosophies. The Intel Core i7-4710HQ is a Haswell-based mobile chip, built on Intel's 22 nm process with a die size of 264 mm². It uses the Crystalwell codename and fits into the Intel BGA 1364 socket. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is a Zen-based desktop part, built on GlobalFoundries' 14 nm process with a smaller die size of 210 mm². It uses the Raven Ridge codename and fits into the AMD Socket AM4.

The transistor counts tell a dramatic story. Intel's chip packs 1,400 million transistors, while AMD's chip contains 4,950 million, more than triple the count. This reflects the different design priorities: Intel's Haswell architecture is older and more conservative, while AMD's Zen architecture integrates more complex logic and a more powerful integrated GPU.

Cache hierarchies also differ notably. The Intel part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part has 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and only 4 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD's larger per-core caches compensate for its smaller shared pool, but the total cache capacity is still lower on the AMD side.

The integrated graphics are a major differentiator. Intel uses the HD 4600, a modest integrated GPU designed for basic display output. AMD uses the Radeon RX Vega 11, which is a far more capable graphics solution. This is reflected in the market positioning: the i7-4710HQ targets mobile laptops, while the Ryzen 5 2400G targets desktop systems where integrated graphics can serve as a viable entry point.

Memory support also diverges. The Intel chip uses DDR3, while the AMD chip uses DDR4. The AMD platform's dual-channel DDR4 interface delivers 46.9 GB/s, nearly double the 25.6 GB/s of the Intel part. PCIe lane allocation differs too: Intel provides 16 CPU lanes at Gen 3, while AMD provides 8 lanes at Gen 3. This means the Intel chip has more headroom for discrete GPUs, though the AMD chip's integrated graphics reduce the need for such expansion.

The production statuses are opposite: the Intel part is end-of-life, while the AMD part remains active. The Intel chip launched in 2014, while the AMD chip launched in 2018. The AMD part also has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, whereas the Intel part is locked.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear sweep in favor of the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G across all four head-to-head tests. The most dramatic gap appears in Cinebench R15 single-core, where AMD leads by 57.6%. The Intel Core i7-4710HQ scores 66, while the AMD part scores 155.65. This is a massive difference that suggests the Zen architecture has a substantial per-clock advantage over Haswell, even accounting for the higher base and boost clocks on the AMD side.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD chip leads by 44.2%, scoring 846.5 versus 472. This is a smaller margin than single-core, but still very significant. Both chips have 4 cores and 8 threads, so the difference comes down to IPC and clock speed. The AMD part's base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost of 3.90 GHz are well above Intel's 2.50 GHz base and 3.50 GHz boost.

The Geekbench multi-core test shows a 28.2% advantage for AMD, with scores of 3750 versus 2694. This is a more moderate gap than the Cinebench results, suggesting that different workloads scale differently. The Geekbench single-core test is the closest contest, with AMD leading by only 5.6%, scoring 1003 versus 947. This narrow margin indicates that in lightly threaded, latency-sensitive tasks, the two processors are much closer.

The wins tally is unambiguous: AMD wins 4 tests, Intel wins 0. The average benchmark scores, however, tell a slightly different story. The Intel part has an average score of 1473, while the AMD part has 1439. This is because the Intel chip's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-5575R (1478, 0.3% ahead) and the Intel Core i5-7500T (1483, 0.7% ahead), while the AMD chip's rivals include the Intel Core i7-4712HQ (1436, 0.2% behind) and the AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE (1444, 0.4% behind). The average scores are based on a broader benchmark suite, not just the head-to-head tests.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is the superior performer in every direct comparison available. It wins all four head-to-head tests, with margins ranging from 5.6% to 57.6%. The largest wins come in Cinebench tests, which are heavily threaded and clock-sensitive. The smallest win is in Geekbench single-core, where the two chips are nearly equal.

However, the Intel Core i7-4710HQ holds a slight edge in average benchmark score (1473 versus 1439), which suggests that its overall performance profile is more balanced across a wider range of workloads. The Intel part's nearest rivals are all Intel chips, and it sits within 0.8% of them. The AMD part's nearest rivals include both Intel and AMD chips, and it sits within 0.5% of them.

The choice between these two depends on the use case. For users who prioritize integrated graphics, the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is the clear pick, as the Radeon RX Vega 11 is far more capable than Intel's HD 4600. For users who need maximum CPU throughput in multi-threaded applications, the AMD part also wins decisively. The Intel part's advantages are limited to its higher average benchmark score and its larger PCIe lane allocation, which may matter for systems with discrete GPUs.

The Intel chip is end-of-life and locked, while the AMD chip is active and unlocked. This makes the AMD part more future-proof and more flexible for overclocking. The AMD chip also uses DDR4 memory, which is more modern and offers higher bandwidth. The Intel chip's DDR3 support is a legacy constraint.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-4710HQ | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |

|----------------|----------------------|-------------------|

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.50 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| TDP | 47 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1364 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Haswell | Zen |

| Codename | Crystalwell | Raven Ridge |

| Process Node | 22 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |

| Transistors | 1,400 million | 4,950 million |

| Die Size | 264 mm² | 210 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 46.9 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | Radeon RX Vega 11 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2014-03-31 | 2018-02-11 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G wins in all measured benchmark categories. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it is 44.2% ahead, which makes it the better choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, and other heavily threaded productivity tasks. In Cinebench R15 single-core, it is 57.6% ahead, which benefits applications that rely on fast single-threaded execution, such as older games and certain legacy software. In Geekbench multi-core, it is 28.2% ahead, reinforcing its strength in parallel workloads. In Geekbench single-core, it is 5.6% ahead, a modest but consistent advantage.

The AMD part also wins on platform features. Its DDR4 memory support delivers 46.9 GB/s, which is nearly double the Intel chip's 25.6 GB/s. This benefits memory-bandwidth-sensitive applications. Its integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 GPU is substantially more powerful than Intel's HD 4600, making it suitable for light gaming and media tasks without a discrete GPU. Its unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which can further extend its performance lead.

The Intel Core i7-4710HQ has no benchmark wins, but it does have some structural advantages. Its TDP of 47 W is lower than the AMD part's 65 W, which makes it more power-efficient for mobile use. Its 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes provide more bandwidth for discrete GPUs, which could be relevant in a laptop with a dedicated graphics card. Its larger L3 cache of 6 MB versus 4 MB may help in some cache-sensitive workloads. Its average benchmark score of 1473 is higher than the AMD part's 1439, indicating that across a broader benchmark suite, it holds a slight edge.

The Intel part is end-of-life, so it is only relevant for existing systems or legacy upgrades. The AMD part is active and current, making it the more sensible choice for new builds. The data suggests that the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is the better all-around processor, with the Intel part retaining niche advantages in power consumption and PCIe expansion.