AMD Ryzen 5 240 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-96-100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare to the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-96-100 in core count?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Snapdragon X2E-96-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads. The Snapdragon uses a 1:1 core-to-thread ratio, meaning no simultaneous multithreading, whereas the AMD part relies on SMT to double its thread count.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Snapdragon X2E-96-100 is built on a 3 nm process node, while the Ryzen 5 240 uses a 4 nm node. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The Snapdragon X2E-96-100 offers 228.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth via triple-channel LPDDR5X, compared to 89.6 GB/s for the Ryzen 5 240's dual-channel DDR5. That is a 139 GB/s gap, or roughly 2.55 times the bandwidth.

Q: Do both processors have the same boost clock?

A: Yes, both list a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The base clocks differ, with the Snapdragon at 4.45 GHz and the Ryzen at 4.30 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 ranks in the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the Snapdragon X2E-96-100 sits at the 50th percentile. The Ryzen's average benchmark score is 33542, while the Snapdragon currently has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: Are both processors intended for mobile devices?

A: Yes, both are listed with a market segment of "Mobile." The Ryzen uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2343.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 is based on the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-96-100 uses the Glymur codename from the Snapdragon X2 series (Elite tier). The Ryzen is a conventional x86 design with 6 cores and 12 threads, relying on simultaneous multithreading to double throughput per core. The Snapdragon, by contrast, is an ARM-based part with 18 physical cores and 18 threads, with no SMT support.

The process technology differs by one node: AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process, while Qualcomm moves to 3 nm. Transistor counts are only stated for the AMD part at 25,000 million, which fits into a die size of 178 mm². The Snapdragon's die is larger at 220 mm², but its transistor count is not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies diverge sharply. The Ryzen 5 240 provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Snapdragon X2E-96-100 offers 288 KB of L1 per core, 16 MB of L2 per module, and only 9 MB of shared L3. The Snapdragon's L2 is organized differently, with a per-module allocation rather than per-core, and its total L3 is 7 MB smaller than the AMD part's.

Memory architecture also separates the two. The Ryzen uses dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Snapdragon uses triple-channel LPDDR5X with 228.6 GB/s. The Snapdragon's memory bandwidth is a major architectural advantage, more than double the Ryzen's. PCIe support also differs: the Ryzen offers Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Snapdragon provides Gen 5 with 12 CPU lanes, a newer standard but fewer lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 5 240 pairs with a Radeon 760M, while the Snapdragon includes an Adreno X2-90. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as active production parts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen 5 240 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-96-100. The wins counter for both sides is zero. The Snapdragon has no recorded benchmark scores of its own, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. This makes a direct performance comparison impossible from the recorded data.

The Ryzen 5 240, however, has a full set of benchmark results. In Cinebench R23, it scores 13013 in multicore and 1742 in single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2078 multicore and 270 single-core. PassMark results show a multithread score of 22658 and a single-thread score of 3675. Other PassMark sub-tests include integer math at 73189, floating-point math at 45301, data compression at 267963, data encryption at 15849, extended instructions at 20201, physics at 1060, random string sorting at 32385, and prime number finding at 70.

The Snapdragon X2E-96-100 has no comparable numbers, so the data cannot indicate which processor wins any particular workload. The only ranking information available is the percentile: the Ryzen sits at the 84th percentile for all CPUs, while the Snapdragon sits at the 50th percentile. That percentile gap suggests the Ryzen has a stronger overall standing in the database, but without Snapdragon benchmark data, this remains a positional observation rather than a direct performance claim.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 240 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-96-100 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 18 |

| Threads | 12 | 18 |

| Base clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.45 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | Not specified |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Qualcomm BGA 2343 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Not specified |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Glymur |

| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 4, Hawk Point) | Snapdragon X2 (Elite) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Die size | 178 mm² | 220 mm² |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not specified |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 288 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 16 MB per module |

| L3 cache | 16 MB shared | 9 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Triple-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 228.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 760M | Adreno X2-90 |

| Release date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-04-05 |

| Part number | 100-000001727 | X2E96100 |

The Verdict

The recorded data does not permit a definitive performance verdict between these two processors. The Snapdragon X2E-96-100 has no benchmark scores in the database, while the Ryzen 5 240 has a substantial set. The Ryzen's 84th percentile ranking versus the Snapdragon's 50th percentile is the only comparative ranking available, and it favors the AMD part by a wide margin. However, this ranking may reflect the Snapdragon's lack of recorded results rather than its true capability.

The Snapdragon does hold clear architectural advantages on paper. Its 18 cores, 3 nm process, and 228.6 GB/s memory bandwidth are all superior to the Ryzen's specifications. The Ryzen counters with a larger L3 cache (16 MB versus 9 MB), a lower power envelope (45 W TDP versus unspecified), and a more conventional x86 design with SMT. The Ryzen also has a longer-established presence in the database, with a release date of 2025-01-05 compared to the Snapdragon's 2026-04-05.

The verdict from the data alone is that the Ryzen 5 240 is the only one of the two with measurable benchmark performance, and it holds a much higher database percentile. The Snapdragon's untested status leaves its real-world standing unknown, so any preference for it must rely on its specification sheet rather than measured results.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 240 wins in every category where actual benchmark data exists, simply because the Snapdragon has none recorded. The Ryzen's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13013 and single-core score of 1742, along with its PassMark multithread score of 22658 and single-thread score of 3675, establish a baseline of measured performance. Its 45 W TDP also gives it a defined power profile, which is useful for mobile system design.

The Snapdragon X2E-96-100 wins on specifications that are not yet validated by benchmarks. Its 18 cores and 18 threads provide a raw core-count advantage, and its 4.45 GHz base clock is 150 MHz higher than the Ryzen's. The triple-channel LPDDR5X memory system with 228.6 GB/s bandwidth is a substantial theoretical lead, particularly for memory-intensive workloads. The 3 nm process node and 220 mm² die size suggest a modern, high-density design, and the Adreno X2-90 integrated graphics may offer different graphical capabilities than the Radeon 760M, though neither has been tested head-to-head.

The database also shows the Snapdragon with a later release date, indicating it is a newer design. Its 50th percentile ranking, while below the Ryzen's 84th, is still a mid-pack position, which implies it is not a bottom-tier part even without benchmark scores. The Ryzen's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (delta 0%), AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (delta -0.4%), AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX (delta -0.4%), and Intel Core i5-12600HX (delta 0.5%), placing it in a dense competitive cluster. The Snapdragon has no recorded rivals, which further limits comparative analysis.

For users who prioritize measured results, the Ryzen 5 240 is the only option with data to support it. For those who value core count, memory bandwidth, and process technology on paper, the Snapdragon X2E-96-100 offers a compelling specification sheet, but its actual performance remains unverified in the database.