AMD Ryzen 5 240 vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 240 vs Intel Core 9 273PQE: a comparison that the database does not present as close. Across every recorded head-to-head benchmark, the Intel Core 9 273PQE posts the higher score, and the margin is substantial in most tests. The Ryzen 5 240 holds the advantage in power efficiency and platform characteristics, but in raw compute output, the Intel part dominates the recorded data. This analysis walks through the benchmark results, architectural differences, and the use cases where each processor shows its strengths.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records 15 head-to-head comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 5 240 and the Intel Core 9 273PQE, and the Intel processor wins all 15. The largest gap appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where Intel scores 39190 against AMD’s 13013, a delta of -66.8% for the Ryzen. That means the Intel part delivers roughly three times the multi-core rendering performance in this test. A similar pattern shows in Cinebench R23 single-core: Intel scores 5532, AMD scores 1742, a delta of -68.5%. The single-core advantage is nearly as large as the multi-core one, which indicates the Intel chip’s higher boost clock contributes meaningfully.

Cinebench R15 results follow the same direction. In multi-core, Intel scores 3950 versus AMD’s 2078, a delta of -47.4%. In single-core, Intel scores 557 versus AMD’s 270, a delta of -51.5%. These deltas are smaller in percentage terms than the R23 results, but they still show Intel ahead by roughly half.

PassMark tests show Intel winning every category. The smallest margin is in single-thread performance: Intel scores 4573, AMD scores 3675, a delta of -19.6%. That is the closest result in the entire head-to-head set, and it indicates that in lightly threaded workloads, the Ryzen 5 240 is less far behind. The largest PassMark margin is in floating point math, where Intel scores 125546 versus AMD’s 45301, a delta of -63.9%. Integer math shows Intel at 164629 versus AMD’s 73189, a delta of -55.5%. Data compression: Intel 585752, AMD 267963, delta -54.3%. Data encryption: Intel 29636, AMD 15849, delta -46.5%. Extended instructions: Intel 38743, AMD 20201, delta -47.9%. Prime number finding: Intel 198, AMD 70, delta -64.6%. Physics: Intel 2754, AMD 1060, delta -61.5%. Random string sorting: Intel 53167, AMD 32385, delta -39.1%. Multithread: Intel 46107, AMD 22658, delta -50.9%.

The overall average benchmark score reflects this imbalance. The Intel Core 9 273PQE has an average benchmark score of 66099, while the AMD Ryzen 5 240 sits at 33542. The Intel part lands in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD part lands in the 84th percentile. The nearest rival for the Intel chip is the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, which scores 66159, a delta of -0.1%. The AMD chip’s nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, scoring 33537, a delta of 0%. These rival positions confirm that each processor sits in a different performance tier.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers, nodes, and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. The process difference is notable: AMD’s 4 nm node is denser, which helps explain the Ryzen’s lower power draw.

Core counts differ sharply. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel chip has 12 cores and 24 threads, exactly double. That doubling shows up in multi-threaded benchmarks, where Intel’s scores are roughly 50% to 66% higher in several tests. The Ryzen 5 240 has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz. The lower base clock on the Intel part is offset by a much higher boost clock, which explains its single-core wins.

Cache configurations also differ. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 on the Intel part, 36 MB versus 16 MB, likely contributes to its lead in data compression and random string sorting, which are cache-sensitive workloads. The Intel chip also supports ECC memory, while the AMD chip does not. Both support DDR5, but the Intel part also supports DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory, and both have a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

The socket and platform differ completely. AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-oriented socket, while Intel uses Socket 1700, a desktop socket. The AMD chip is marked as a mobile market segment part, while the Intel chip is marked as a desktop market segment part. The AMD chip’s integrated graphics is the Radeon 760M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770. PCIe support also differs: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part has a higher PCIe generation, which can matter for storage and GPU bandwidth in desktop builds.

Power draw is a major split. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 watts. That is a nearly threefold difference in thermal design power. The AMD chip’s lower TDP aligns with its mobile positioning and 4 nm process. The Intel chip’s higher TDP aligns with its desktop role and 10 nm process. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking headroom is not part of the data.

Release dates differ as well. The AMD chip was released on January 5, 2025. The Intel chip was released on March 8, 2026, over a year later. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $589, which the database lists once. The AMD chip has no launch MSRP in the recorded data. Production status for both is listed as Active.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PQE wins every recorded benchmark in the head-to-head set, so the use-case split is defined by the degree of its lead and by non-benchmark factors. The Intel part is the clear choice for multi-threaded rendering, simulation, and content creation. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 is more than triple the AMD chip’s 13013, which makes it suited for CPU-heavy workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing. Its PassMark multithread score of 46107 versus 22658 for AMD reinforces that. The Intel part also leads in single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5532 versus 1742 for AMD, so it handles lightly threaded tasks like legacy applications and some games better.

The AMD Ryzen 5 240 does not win any recorded benchmark, but its profile suits a different set of scenarios. Its 45-watt TDP makes it a more power-conscious option for mobile systems, as it uses the AMD Socket FP8 platform. The Radeon 760M integrated graphics may provide more capable graphics output than the Intel UHD Graphics 770 in some integrated scenarios, though the database does not record graphics benchmarks. The AMD chip’s 4 nm process and smaller die size, 178 mm², suggest a more compact design, though the Intel die size is not recorded. For users who prioritize battery life, thermal headroom, or a mobile form factor, the AMD chip’s lower power draw is the key differentiator.

In memory support, the Intel chip offers both DDR4 and DDR5, which gives it flexibility in desktop builds with older or newer RAM. The AMD chip supports only DDR5. The Intel chip also supports ECC memory, which matters for reliability in workstation or server-like tasks. The AMD chip has more PCIe lanes from the CPU, 20 versus 16, but at Gen 4 speed, while the Intel chip runs Gen 5. For high-bandwidth devices, the Intel chip’s PCIe Gen 5 may be more future-proof, but the AMD chip has more total lanes.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Intel Core 9 273PQE is the faster processor in every measured test. The database shows a 93rd percentile ranking for the Intel part versus 84th for the AMD part. The average benchmark score difference, 66099 versus 33542, is roughly a 97% higher average for Intel. The Intel chip wins multi-core, single-core, and all PassMark sub-tests. If the decision rests purely on compute performance, the Intel Core 9 273PQE is the answer.

The AMD Ryzen 5 240 is the answer for a different set of constraints. It draws 45 watts versus 125 watts, which makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops or systems where power and heat are limited. Its mobile socket and mobile market segment confirm that positioning. The AMD chip also uses a 4 nm process, which is smaller than the Intel chip’s 10 nm node, and it has a smaller die size at 178 mm². For users who need a capable processor in a low-power envelope, the AMD chip is the appropriate choice, but the data shows no performance scenario where it outruns the Intel part.

The Intel Core 9 273PQE, with its launch MSRP of $589, targets desktop users who need maximum throughput. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, 36 MB of L3 cache, and 5.90 GHz boost clock give it a decisive edge in threaded workloads. Its ECC memory support and DDR4 compatibility add flexibility for workstation builds. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 targets mobile users who need a balanced processor with lower power consumption, and its 5.00 GHz boost clock and 6 cores still provide solid single-thread performance, though it trails the Intel part by 19.6% in the closest head-to-head test.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has an average benchmark score of 66099, while the AMD Ryzen 5 240 has an average benchmark score of 33542. The Intel part also ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, versus 84th for the AMD chip.

Q: How much faster is the Intel chip in multi-core rendering?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 39190, while the AMD Ryzen 5 240 scores 13013. That is a delta of -66.8% for the AMD chip, meaning the Intel part is roughly three times faster in this test.

Q: What is the closest benchmark result between the two?

A: The closest result is in PassMark single-thread performance. The Intel chip scores 4573, and the AMD chip scores 3675, a delta of -19.6%. This is the smallest percentage gap in the head-to-head data.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part has exactly double the core and thread count.

Q: What is the power draw difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 240 has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 watts. The AMD chip uses significantly less power, which aligns with its mobile market segment.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename. The process node differs: AMD uses 4 nm at TSMC, while Intel uses 10 nm at its own foundry. Core and thread counts differ, with AMD at 6 cores and 12 threads, and Intel at 12 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are 4.30 GHz for AMD and 3.40 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 5.90 GHz for Intel. TDP is 45 watts for AMD and 125 watts for Intel.

Cache sizes differ. AMD has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. ECC memory is supported on Intel but not on AMD. PCIe differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD has the Radeon 760M, Intel has UHD Graphics 770. The socket differs: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Socket 1700. The market segment differs: AMD is mobile, Intel is desktop. Release dates differ: AMD on January 5, 2025, Intel on March 8, 2026. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $589, while AMD has no recorded MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.