AMD Ryzen 5 240 vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS and AMD Ryzen 5 240 are both modern mobile processors built on the same Zen 4 architecture, but they are positioned differently within AMD’s lineup. The 8840HS is an 8-core part from the 8000 series, while the 240 is a 6-core chip released a year later. Benchmark data shows they are remarkably close in overall performance, with the Ryzen 7 8840HS holding a slight edge in average score, but the individual test results tell a more nuanced story about where each chip excels.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking finding is how close these two processors are in multi-threaded workloads, despite the 8840HS having two more cores and four more threads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen 7 8840HS scores 13,082, which is a mere 0.5% ahead of the Ryzen 5 240’s 13,013. Similarly, in Cinebench R15 multi-core, the tables turn slightly: the Ryzen 5 240 wins with a score of 2,078 against 2,045 for the 8840HS, a 1.6% margin. The 6-core chip’s higher base clock of 4.30 GHz appears to compensate for its core deficit in these specific tests.

Single-core performance is effectively a tie. In Cinebench R15 single-core, both chips score exactly 270. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Ryzen 5 240 edges ahead with 1,742 versus 1,737, a 0.3% difference. The PassMark single-thread test also favors the Ryzen 5 240, which scores 3,675 compared to 3,626 for the 8840HS, a 1.3% advantage. The Ryzen 5 240’s higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 5.10 GHz on the 8840HS, combined with its higher base clock, explains this consistent, if narrow, single-thread superiority.

The Ryzen 7 8840HS dominates in synthetic compute workloads that scale with core count. The largest gap is in PassMark integer math, where the 8840HS scores 90,382, a massive 23.5% ahead of the Ryzen 5 240’s 73,189. Floating point math shows a similar trend, with the 8840HS at 52,582 versus 45,301, a 16.1% lead. Prime number finding also favors the 8-core chip, with a 12.9% advantage (79 vs. 70). These results indicate that any workload that can fully utilize all eight cores will see a significant performance benefit from the 8840HS.

The 8840HS also leads in memory and security-related tasks. Its PassMark data encryption score is 17,650, which is 11.4% higher than the 15,849 achieved by the Ryzen 5 240. Data compression shows a 9.3% lead for the 8840HS (292,888 vs. 267,963). The multi-threaded PassMark score, which is a composite of many of these tests, lands at 24,990 for the 8840HS, a 10.3% advantage over the 22,658 of the Ryzen 5 240. The Ryzen 5 240 does manage a win in random string sorting, but the 8840HS still leads by 9.7% (35,517 vs. 32,385).

Overall, the head-to-head data shows the Ryzen 7 8840HS winning 11 of the 15 benchmark comparisons, with the Ryzen 5 240 taking 4. However, the margins in the 8840HS’s wins are generally larger than the margins in the 240’s wins. The 8840HS’s average benchmark score is 33,667, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the Ryzen 5 240’s average score is 33,542, also in the 84th percentile. The delta between the two is a mere 0.4% in favor of the 8840HS, making them near-identical in overall performance metrics.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on the same fundamental architecture: Zen 4, using the Hawk Point codename, and fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. They share the same 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The core configurations are the primary architectural difference. The Ryzen 7 8840HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 has 6 cores and 12 threads. This core count difference is the main driver of the performance gaps seen in multi-threaded tests.

Clock speeds are another key differentiator. The Ryzen 5 240 has a significantly higher base clock of 4.30 GHz compared to the 3.30 GHz of the Ryzen 7 8840HS. The boost clocks are close, with the 8840HS at 5.10 GHz and the 240 at 5.00 GHz. The higher base clock on the 240 likely explains its strong single-thread performance and its ability to nearly match the 8840HS in some multi-threaded tests despite having fewer cores. The thermal design power (TDP) also differs, with the 8840HS rated at 28W and the Ryzen 5 240 at 45W, indicating the 240 is configured for a higher power envelope.

Cache hierarchy is identical. Both chips feature 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is also the same: both support DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The PCIe implementation is identical as well, with Gen 4 support and 20 lanes (CPU only). Neither chip supports ECC memory, and both have a locked multiplier.

The integrated graphics differ. The Ryzen 7 8840HS features the Radeon 780M, while the Ryzen 5 240 comes with the Radeon 760M. Both are integrated solutions, but the 780M is generally considered the higher-tier part. The release dates are different, with the 8840HS launching on December 5, 2023, and the Ryzen 5 240 launching on January 5, 2025, over a year later. Both are currently in active production and use the AMD Socket FP8.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core tasks?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 wins in most single-core benchmarks, but by a very narrow margin. It scores 1,742 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 1,737 for the Ryzen 7 8840HS, and 3,675 in PassMark single-thread versus 3,626. In Cinebench R15 single-core, they are tied at exactly 270.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 8840HS have more cores?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 8840HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 has 6 cores and 12 threads. This gives the 8840HS a significant advantage in multi-threaded workloads that can utilize all cores.

Q: Why is the Ryzen 5 240 so close in multi-core performance despite having fewer cores?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 has a much higher base clock of 4.30 GHz compared to the 3.30 GHz on the 8840HS. It also has a higher TDP of 45W versus 28W, which allows it to sustain higher clocks. This helps it almost match the 8840HS in Cinebench multi-core tests.

Q: What is the biggest performance difference between the two?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark integer math, where the Ryzen 7 8840HS scores 90,382, which is 23.5% higher than the Ryzen 5 240’s 73,189. The 8840HS also holds a 16.1% lead in floating point math.

Q: Do they use the same socket and memory?

A: Yes, both use the AMD Socket FP8 and support DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. They also have the same memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and identical L3 cache of 16 MB.

Q: Which processor has a better integrated GPU?

A: The Ryzen 7 8840HS features the Radeon 780M, while the Ryzen 5 240 has the Radeon 760M. The 780M is the higher-tier integrated graphics solution.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear, if narrow, overall victory for the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS. Its average benchmark score of 33,667 is 0.4% higher than the Ryzen 5 240’s 33,542. For users who prioritize raw multi-threaded performance, the 8840HS is the better choice, offering a 23.5% lead in integer math and a 16.1% lead in floating-point math. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides a distinct advantage in heavily parallel workloads like video rendering, code compilation, and scientific computing.

For users who focus on single-threaded responsiveness or prefer a processor with a higher base clock, the Ryzen 5 240 is a compelling option. It wins the PassMark single-thread test with a 1.3% margin and ties in Cinebench R15 single-core. Its higher base clock of 4.30 GHz and higher TDP of 45W suggest it may feel more responsive in lightly-threaded applications. Given that the 8840HS has a lower TDP of 28W, it is likely more efficient in a thin-and-light chassis, while the 240’s higher power budget points to a different design target. Users with workloads that are primarily single-threaded may not notice a difference, but those who can leverage all cores will favor the Ryzen 7 8840HS.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS | AMD Ryzen 5 240 |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | Radeon 760M |

| Release Date | 2023-12-05 | 2025-01-05 |

| Part Number | 100-000001372(FP7r2)100-000001379(FP7)100-000001357(FP8) | 100-000001727 |

| Generation | Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)) | Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)) |