AMD Ryzen 5 220 vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a complete benchmark suite for the AMD Ryzen 5 220, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark entries in the current data set. Consequently, direct head-to-head comparisons must rely on the AMD part's absolute scores and its position against the nearest rivals listed in the database, not on a side-by-side matchup with the Intel chip.

Looking at the Ryzen 5 220's multi-threaded results, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15502 points places it solidly in the upper tier of mobile processors. The Cinebench R20 multicore result of 6510 and the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1562 confirm a consistent pattern across rendering workloads. These numbers indicate a processor that can handle sustained multi-core loads without significant degradation, a trait that aligns with its 28 W TDP classification.

Single-thread performance for the Ryzen 5 220 shows a different story. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2188, the Cinebench R20 single-core score of 918, and the Cinebench R15 single-core score of 220 all point to a design prioritizing efficiency and moderate clock speeds. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz does provide headroom for burst workloads, but the recorded scores suggest the architecture favors consistent throughput over peak single-thread dominance.

Geekbench results reinforce this interpretation. The multicore score of 7974 and single-core score of 2027 place the Ryzen 5 220 in a comfortable position for general productivity tasks, though not at the top of the database rankings. The PassMark suite offers additional granularity. The multithread score of 18582, integer math score of 57987, and floating point math score of 35500 demonstrate strong arithmetic capability. More specialized workloads show wider variation: data encryption scores 12493, extended instructions score 15512, and data compression scores 212739. The random string sorting score of 25433 and find prime numbers score of 65 round out the picture of a balanced yet efficiency-oriented part.

The database lists the Ryzen 5 220's average benchmark score as 22289, with a percentile rank of 75 among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals provide context for this figure. The Intel Core i7-10700K averages 22230, a delta of 0.3 percent, meaning the Ryzen 5 220 edges ahead by a negligible margin. The Intel Core i5-13500H scores 22468, putting the AMD part 0.8 percent behind. The Intel Core i7-1270P averages 22502, a 0.9 percent gap in Intel's favor. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X averages 21992, which places the Ryzen 5 220 1.4 percent ahead. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the Ryzen 5 220 performs essentially on par with a desktop i7 from a previous generation and a mid-range mobile i5 from a recent generation.

Because the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark entries, no wins can be attributed to either side in the head-to-head section of the database. The wins counters for both parts sit at zero. What the data does show is that the Ryzen 5 220 holds its own against established competitors, while the i5-14501TE remains an unmeasured quantity in the current records.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split in positioning. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has a full set of measurements, an average score of 22289, and a 75th percentile ranking. It is a known quantity. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmarks, an average score of zero, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects the absence of data rather than measured performance.

For workloads that depend on multi-threaded rendering, the Ryzen 5 220's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15502 and Geekbench multicore score of 7974 indicate capable sustained throughput. For single-threaded responsiveness, its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2188 and PassMark single thread score of 3646 show moderate performance. The database places it within 1 percent of several established rivals, which means buyers can expect performance in the same neighborhood as an Intel Core i7-10700K or an Intel Core i5-13500H.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE cannot be evaluated from benchmark data because none exists in the database. Its specification sheet indicates a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Ryzen 5 220's 4.90 GHz, but without measurements, no performance claims can be substantiated. The 45 W TDP suggests a higher power envelope than the AMD part's 28 W, but the database does not record any thermal or performance results for the Intel chip.

The recorded data indicates that the Ryzen 5 220 is the only one of the two with verified performance. The i5-14501TE remains a specification-only entry.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 220 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 has an average benchmark score of 22289. It is 0.3 percent ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700K, 1.4 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, 0.8 percent behind the Intel Core i5-13500H, and 0.9 percent behind the Intel Core i7-1270P.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14501TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The benchmark array for the Intel Core i5-14501TE is empty, its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 220 ranks at the 75th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-14501TE ranks at the 50th percentile, a figure that reflects the lack of recorded measurements.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 results for the AMD Ryzen 5 220?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 scores 15502 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2188 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is 0.20 GHz higher.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 W, a difference of 17 W.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field recorded in the database. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This means the AMD chip starts at a higher base frequency, but the Intel chip can reach a higher maximum frequency.

TDP figures differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 draws 28 W, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE draws 45 W. The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD die measures 137 mm² and contains 20,900 million transistors. The Intel die measures 215 mm², and the database records no transistor count for it.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it. ECC memory support is absent on the AMD part and present on the Intel part.

PCIe capabilities diverge. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core i5-14501TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses the Radeon 740M, while the Intel part uses the UHD Graphics 770.

The market segments differ. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 is classified as a mobile processor, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE is classified as a desktop processor. The AMD part was released on 2025-01-05, and the Intel part was released on 2024-06-30. Both processors have locked multipliers, and both are listed as active in production. The part numbers are 100-000001611 for AMD and Q49KSRNJN for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between the two chips is significant. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename Hawk Point, belonging to the Ryzen 5 generation with the Zen 4 (Hawk Point) label. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-R, belonging to the Core 14th Gen generation with the Raptor Lake Refresh label.

Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads, so thread counts match. The cache hierarchies differ in size. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip therefore carries more cache at every level.

The foundry and process node differences were noted in the specification section, but they bear repeating in architectural context. TSMC fabricates the AMD chip on a 4 nm node, while Intel fabricates its own chip on a 10 nm node. The transistor count of 20,900 million for the AMD part versus no recorded count for the Intel part, combined with the die size difference of 137 mm² against 215 mm², indicates a denser design for the AMD chip.

The Intel part's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, along with ECC memory support, gives it architectural flexibility that the AMD part lacks. The AMD part's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s provides a quantified figure for data throughput, while the Intel part's bandwidth remains unrecorded. The Radeon 740M integrated GPU on the AMD side and the UHD Graphics 770 on the Intel side represent the two approaches to on-die graphics.

The process node difference of 4 nm versus 10 nm, the cache size differences, and the ECC support are the most consequential architectural distinctions. The AMD part uses a smaller, denser process with less cache. The Intel part uses a larger, less dense process with more cache and broader memory compatibility.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 5 220 wins in every category that requires a measured benchmark result, simply because it has measurements and the Intel Core i5-14501TE does not. The Ryzen 5 220's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15502, Geekbench multicore score of 7974, and PassMark multithread score of 18582 establish its multi-threaded capabilities. Its PassMark integer math score of 57987 and floating point math score of 35500 indicate strong arithmetic throughput. The PassMark data compression score of 212739 and random string sorting score of 25433 suggest solid memory and data-handling performance for a mobile part.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins in the specification comparison where numbers exist. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz exceeds the AMD part's 4.90 GHz. Its L3 cache of 24 MB shared exceeds the AMD part's 16 MB. Its L2 cache of 1.25 MB per core exceeds the AMD part's 1 MB. Its L1 cache of 80 KB per core exceeds the AMD part's 64 KB. It supports ECC memory, which the AMD part does not. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part supports only DDR5. Its PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes exceeds the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes.

The AMD part wins on efficiency metrics. Its TDP of 28 W is lower than the Intel part's 45 W. Its base clock of 3.20 GHz is higher than the Intel part's 2.20 GHz. Its process node of 4 nm is smaller than the Intel part's 10 nm. Its die size of 137 mm² is smaller than the Intel part's 215 mm². Its memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is quantified, while the Intel part's bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

For real-world use cases, the data supports the following split. The Ryzen 5 220 suits mobile and power-conscious configurations where the 28 W TDP and integrated Radeon 740M graphics align with a compact system. The i5-14501TE suits desktop configurations where the 45 W TDP, larger cache pool, ECC memory support, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity provide a broader feature set, though its actual performance remains unverified in the database. The Ryzen 5 220's percentile rank of 75 against the i5-14501TE's rank of 50 reflects data availability more than performance superiority, but it is the only quantitative ranking the database provides.