AMD Ryzen 5 220 vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a one-sided comparison. The Intel Core i5-14490F wins every single recorded head-to-head test, 17 total, against the AMD Ryzen 5 220. The margin of victory varies widely by workload, ranging from a narrow 5.9% edge in single-threaded PassMark tests to a dominant 53% advantage in PassMark physics.

The Cinebench suite shows a remarkably consistent pattern. Across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, the Intel part leads by 32.6% or 32.7% in every test, whether single-core or multi-core. The Ryzen 5 220 scores 1562 in Cinebench R15 multi-core against the Intel's 2318, and 220 versus 327 in single-core. This consistency suggests a fundamental throughput advantage rather than workload-specific optimization. The same 32.6% gap appears in Cinebench R20 multi-core (6510 vs 9660), R20 single-core (918 vs 1363), R23 multi-core (15502 vs 23000), and R23 single-core (2188 vs 3247).

PassMark results show more variation. The smallest gap is in single-thread performance, where the Intel scores 3873 against the AMD's 3646, a 5.9% lead. The largest gaps appear in physics and floating-point math, both at 46.7% or more. The Intel's physics score of 2093 nearly doubles the AMD's 983, a 53% difference. Floating-point math follows at 66558 versus 35500, also a 46.7% gap. Integer math shows a 34% lead for Intel (87844 vs 57987), while multi-threaded PassMark gives Intel a 35.2% advantage (28662 vs 18582).

Data-oriented workloads follow the same direction. PassMark data compression shows Intel ahead by 37.4% (340026 vs 212739), data encryption by 31.5% (18225 vs 12493), and random string sorting by 28.6% (35608 vs 25433). Extended instructions and prime number finding round out the list, with the Intel leading by 28.6% and 46.7% respectively. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 records zero benchmark wins in this head-to-head set, while the Intel Core i5-14490F claims all 17.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, on a 10 nm Intel process. The AMD die measures 137 mm² with 20,900 million transistors; the Intel die is larger at 215 mm² and has no transistor count recorded in the database.

Core configuration differs substantially. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 10 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds tell a nuanced story: the AMD has a higher base clock at 3.20 GHz versus the Intel's 2.50 GHz, but the Intel has a higher boost clock at 5.00 GHz versus the AMD's 4.90 GHz. The AMD operates at a 28 W TDP, while the Intel is rated at 65 W.

Cache hierarchies are built differently. The AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel's larger cache allotments align with its higher core count and thread count.

Memory support diverges. The AMD supports DDR5 only, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded. Both use dual-channel memory buses. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel also includes no integrated graphics, whereas the AMD includes a Radeon 740M iGPU.

Market positioning and platform also differ. The AMD is a mobile processor on the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. The AMD was released on 2025-01-05, and the Intel on 2023-12-31. Both are currently active in production. Neither is multiplier-unlocked, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 has an average score of 22289. The Intel also holds a higher percentile rating at 86 versus the AMD's 75.

Q: How large is the Cinebench R23 multi-core gap?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 23000 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 32.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 220's 15502.

Q: Are there any workloads where the AMD Ryzen 5 220 is competitive?

A: The closest result is PassMark single-thread performance, where the Intel leads by only 5.9% (3873 vs 3646). In every other recorded head-to-head test, the Intel leads by at least 28.6%.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 220 includes a Radeon 740M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: How do the PCIe capabilities compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 220 | Intel Core i5-14490F |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | null |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | null |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | N/A |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2023-12-31 |

| Part Number | 100-000001611 | SRN35 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 22289 | 38149 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 75 | 86 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins every benchmark category in the recorded head-to-head set, so the win distribution is defined by margin rather than direction. The largest advantages for Intel appear in physics (53% ahead), floating-point math (46.7%), and prime number finding (46.7%). These workloads respond to raw compute throughput, and the Intel's 10 cores, 16 threads, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache provide the necessary resources.

The Intel also performs strongly in data compression, leading by 37.4%, and in multi-threaded PassMark, leading by 35.2%. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock supports the smallest margin, a 5.9% lead in single-threaded PassMark, which indicates that per-clock efficiency differences are modest even though the Intel still wins.

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has no benchmark wins in this comparison, but its profile suggests specific strengths. Its 28 W TDP positions it for power-constrained environments, and its mobile Socket FP8 platform targets portable systems. The integrated Radeon 740M GPU removes the need for a discrete graphics card in basic display tasks, which the Intel cannot match since it has no iGPU. The AMD's higher base clock of 3.20 GHz may help in lightly threaded scenarios that stay at base frequency, although the recorded single-thread results still favor Intel.

The AMD's 4 nm TSMC process and smaller 137 mm² die indicate a more compact implementation than Intel's 215 mm² die on a 10 nm process. For applications that prioritize the integrated GPU, mobile compatibility, or lower TDP, the AMD Ryzen 5 220 has a defined role. For raw compute performance across Cinebench rendering, PassMark math, encryption, and data workloads, the Intel Core i5-14490F holds a clear and consistent advantage in every recorded measurement.