AMD Ryzen 5 220 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data presents a clear overall picture, but the details reveal a more nuanced story. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 wins 15 of the 17 recorded benchmark comparisons, with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U taking only two. The scale of those victories, however, varies dramatically depending on the workload.

The largest margin is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Ryzen 5 220 scores 15502 against the PRO 6650U's 8854. That is a 75.1% advantage, a massive gap that suggests the newer processor has a decisive edge in heavily threaded rendering tasks. Single-core performance in the same test suite tells a similar, though less extreme, story: the Ryzen 5 220 leads with 2188 versus 1463, a 49.6% difference. These two results alone establish the Ryzen 5 220 as the stronger processor for sustained, compute-heavy workloads.

Not all multi-core tests show such a dramatic split. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen 5 220 scores 1562 against 1459.5, a 7% win. This is a much closer contest, and it hints that the older test may not fully stress the architectural advantages of the newer chip. Geekbench multi-core shows a 12.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 220, with scores of 7974 and 7065. The Ryzen 5 220 also wins Geekbench single-core by 22.7%, scoring 2027 versus 1652.

The PassMark suite offers a mixed bag. The Ryzen 5 220 wins data compression (212739 vs 190180, an 11.9% lead), extended instructions (15512 vs 12261, a 26.5% lead), and random string sorting (25433 vs 20299, a 25.3% lead). In floating point math, it takes a more modest 9% win, scoring 35500 against 32571. The Ryzen 5 220 also leads in find prime numbers, 65 versus 52, a 25% margin, and in physics, 983 versus 837, a 17.4% difference. PassMark multi-thread shows a 13.1% advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (18582 vs 16429), and single-thread shows a 15.8% lead (3646 vs 3149).

The PRO 6650U's two wins are worth examining closely. In Cinebench R15 single-core, it scores 232.5 against the Ryzen 5 220's 220, a 5.4% lead. This is an interesting outlier, given that the Ryzen 5 220 wins the newer Cinebench R23 single-core test by 49.6%. The other win is in PassMark integer math, where the PRO 6650U scores 60045 against 57987, a 3.4% advantage. These are narrow victories, and they do not offset the overall trend. Data encryption is nearly a tie, with the Ryzen 5 220 leading by just 2.7%, scoring 12493 versus 12159.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results suggest distinct use-case strengths. The Ryzen 5 220 is the clear choice for multi-threaded, CPU-intensive work. Its 75.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is the standout figure, but the consistent wins across Geekbench multi-core (12.9%), PassMark multi-thread (13.1%), and PassMark physics (17.4%) reinforce this pattern. Rendering, video encoding, and any workload that scales across all 12 threads will favor the Ryzen 5 220 by a substantial margin.

Single-threaded performance is also firmly in the Ryzen 5 220's corner, based on the majority of the data. The 49.6% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and the 22.7% lead in Geekbench single-core indicate faster per-core execution. PassMark single-thread backs this up with a 15.8% advantage. The PRO 6650U's win in Cinebench R15 single-core is notable, but it appears to be an isolated result given the broader single-core benchmark set.

The PRO 6650U's wins point to a narrower set of strengths. Its 3.4% lead in PassMark integer math suggests it handles integer-heavy, possibly legacy or specific database-style workloads slightly better. The Cinebench R15 single-core win, while small, shows that in certain older test conditions, it can be competitive. For general productivity, the Ryzen 5 220's wins in data compression (11.9%) and random string sorting (25.3%) make it the better pick for tasks like file archiving or data processing.

For users prioritizing raw compute throughput, the data overwhelmingly points to the Ryzen 5 220. For users whose workloads are dominated by integer math operations, the PRO 6650U holds a slim but real edge. The power envelope also differs, with the PRO 6650U rated at a 15 TDP versus the Ryzen 5 220's 28 TDP, which may influence platform-level decisions even if the benchmark scores favor the newer chip.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations, and the benchmark data reflects those changes. The Ryzen 5 220 is built on Zen 4, using the Hawk Point codename, while the PRO 6650U uses Zen 3+ with the Rembrandt codename. This generational jump is paired with a process node shrink: the Ryzen 5 220 is on a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the PRO 6650U is on a 6 nm process, also from TSMC. The die sizes differ accordingly, with the Ryzen 5 220 at 137 mm² and the PRO 6650U at 208 mm².

Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads, so the core count is identical. The cache hierarchy, however, shows a key difference. The L1 cache is the same at 64 KB per core, and total L3 cache is also the same at 16 MB shared. The L2 cache differs: the Ryzen 5 220 has 1 MB per core, while the PRO 6650U has 512 KB per core. This doubling of L2 cache on the Ryzen 5 220 likely contributes to its strong performance in memory-sensitive tasks like data compression and string sorting.

Clock speeds also favor the Ryzen 5 220. Its base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, compared to the PRO 6650U's 2.90 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost. The higher boost clock, combined with the more efficient 4 nm process, helps explain the significant single-core performance gap in most tests.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 5 220 features a Radeon 740M, while the PRO 6650U features a Radeon 660M. The transistor counts are not directly comparable, as the Ryzen 5 220 lists 20,900 million transistors while the PRO 6650U has no recorded transistor count. Both support DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, but memory bandwidth differs: the Ryzen 5 220 offers 89.6 GB/s, while the PRO 6650U offers 76.8 GB/s. PCIe lanes also differ, with the Ryzen 5 220 providing Gen 4 with 14 lanes and the PRO 6650U providing Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

The sockets are different as well. The Ryzen 5 220 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the PRO 6650U uses AMD Socket FP7. This means they are not drop-in compatible with each other. The PRO 6650U belongs to the 6000 series, while the Ryzen 5 220 has no series designation. The Ryzen 5 220 was released on January 5, 2025, while the PRO 6650U was released on April 18, 2022.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U's boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: How much faster is the Ryzen 5 220 in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 scores 15502 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 75.1% higher than the PRO 6650U's score of 8854.

Q: Does the PRO 6650U win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, the PRO 6650U wins two benchmarks: Cinebench R15 single-core (232.5 vs 220, a 5.4% lead) and PassMark integer math (60045 vs 57987, a 3.4% lead).

Q: What is the difference in L2 cache between the two processors?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the PRO 6650U has 512 KB of L2 cache per core. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Are both processors on the same manufacturing process?

A: No. The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the PRO 6650U is manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 has a TDP of 28, while the PRO 6650U has a TDP of 15.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The Ryzen 5 220 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz, while the PRO 6650U has a base clock of 2.90 GHz. The boost clock also differs, with the Ryzen 5 220 at 4.90 GHz and the PRO 6650U at 4.50 GHz. The TDP is not the same: the Ryzen 5 220 is rated at 28, while the PRO 6650U is rated at 15. The socket changes as well, with the Ryzen 5 220 using AMD Socket FP8 and the PRO 6650U using AMD Socket FP7.

The architecture is different, with Zen 4 on the Ryzen 5 220 and Zen 3+ on the PRO 6650U. The codenames reflect this: Hawk Point for the Ryzen 5 220 and Rembrandt for the PRO 6650U. The process node is 4 nm for the Ryzen 5 220 and 6 nm for the PRO 6650U. The die size is 137 mm² for the Ryzen 5 220 and 208 mm² for the PRO 6650U. The transistor count is listed as 20,900 million for the Ryzen 5 220, while the PRO 6650U has no recorded transistor count.

L2 cache differs, with the Ryzen 5 220 offering 1 MB per core and the PRO 6650U offering 512 KB per core. Memory bandwidth is higher on the Ryzen 5 220 at 89.6 GB/s, versus 76.8 GB/s on the PRO 6650U. PCIe lane counts differ, with the Ryzen 5 220 providing 14 lanes and the PRO 6650U providing 20 lanes, both on Gen 4. The integrated graphics are also different: Radeon 740M on the Ryzen 5 220 and Radeon 660M on the PRO 6650U. The release dates are not the same, with the Ryzen 5 220 released on January 5, 2025, and the PRO 6650U released on April 18, 2022. The part numbers also differ, with the Ryzen 5 220 listed as 100-000001611 and the PRO 6650U listed as 100-000000539100-000000551.

The Verdict

The benchmark data makes the choice clear for most users. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 is the stronger processor in nearly every measurable category. It holds a 75.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core, a 49.6% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core, and a 22.7% lead in Geekbench single-core. Its wins in data compression, random string sorting, extended instructions, and physics all point to a well-rounded performance profile that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications.

The PRO 6650U is not without merit. Its 3.4% win in PassMark integer math and 5.4% win in Cinebench R15 single-core show that it can compete in specific, narrow workloads. Its lower 15 TDP also makes it a more power-efficient option on paper, which could matter in fanless or ultraportable designs. But the performance gap in the broader benchmark suite is too large to ignore.

Users who need maximum CPU throughput for rendering, encoding, compilation, or data processing should choose the Ryzen 5 220. The data shows it is consistently ahead, often by double-digit percentages. Users who prioritize the lowest power envelope and happen to run integer-math-heavy workloads may find the PRO 6650U acceptable, but they will be sacrificing significant performance in most other areas. The recorded benchmarks do not support the PRO 6650U as a general-purpose performance pick over the Ryzen 5 220.