AMD Ryzen 5 220 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7535U Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U and AMD Ryzen 5 220 are both 6-core, 12-thread mobile processors, but they represent two distinct generations of AMD’s mobile lineup. The 7535U is a 7000-series part based on Zen 3+ on a 6 nm process, while the 220 is a newer Zen 4 part on a 4 nm process. Benchmark data shows the Ryzen 5 220 wins 14 of 17 head-to-head tests, with decisive victories in multi-core and single-core workloads, while the 7535U retains a few niche wins in specific integer, encryption, and older single-core tests. The choice between them hinges on whether you prioritize the raw performance of the newer architecture or the specific encoding and legacy workloads where the older chip still leads.

The Verdict

From the data, the AMD Ryzen 5 220 is the clear performance leader for general-purpose and multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15502 is 44.6% higher than the 7535U’s 8591, and its single-core score of 2188 is 35.4% higher. In Geekbench, the 220 leads by 18.9% in multi-core (7974 vs 6466) and 21% in single-core (2027 vs 1602). If you are building a system for rendering, compiling, or any task that scales with cores and modern IPC, the Ryzen 5 220 is the pick.

The Ryzen 5 7535U is not obsolete, though. It wins in PassMark integer math (62109 vs 57987, a 7.1% lead), data encryption (12706 vs 12493, a 1.7% lead), and Cinebench R15 single-core (225 vs 220, a 2.3% lead). These are narrow margins, but for specific workloads like heavy integer arithmetic or legacy encryption routines, the older chip holds its own. The 7535U also has a slightly higher average benchmark score relative to its nearest rivals, sitting at a 76th percentile versus the 220’s 75th, though the 220’s raw average of 22289 is actually lower than the 7535U’s 22791 despite winning most tests—the averages are skewed by different benchmark sets.

For most users, the Ryzen 5 220 is the better buy on performance alone. The 7535U only makes sense if you specifically need ECC memory support, which the 220 lacks, or if your workload is dominated by the three tests where the 7535U wins. Otherwise, the 220’s massive multi-core advantage and higher boost clock make it the superior all-rounder.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in their underlying architecture. The Ryzen 5 7535U uses Zen 3+ (codenamed Rembrandt-R) built on TSMC’s 6 nm process, with a die size of 208 mm². The Ryzen 5 220 uses Zen 4 (codenamed Hawk Point) on TSMC’s 4 nm process, with a die size of 137 mm² and 20,900 million transistors. The newer 4 nm node allows the 220 to pack more transistors into a smaller die, which contributes to its higher clock speeds: the 220 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boost of 4.90 GHz, versus the 7535U’s 2.90 GHz base and 4.55 GHz boost.

Cache configurations also diverge. Both have 64 KB of L1 per core and 16 MB of shared L3, but the 220 doubles the L2 cache to 1 MB per core, while the 7535U has 512 KB per core. This larger L2 likely helps the 220 in memory-intensive workloads. Memory bandwidth also favors the 220 at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the 7535U, though both support DDR5 dual-channel memory. The 7535U supports ECC memory, while the 220 does not.

The integrated graphics differ as well: the 7535U has a Radeon 660M, while the 220 has a Radeon 740M. The 220 also has fewer PCIe lanes (14 vs 20 for the 7535U), both at Gen 4. The sockets are different (FP7 vs FP8), meaning they are not interchangeable in the same motherboard. The 7535U was released in January 2023, while the 220 followed in January 2025.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 220 is significantly faster. It scores 15502 in Cinebench R23 multi-core versus 8591 for the 7535U, a 44.6% advantage. In Geekbench multi-core, the 220 leads with 7974 versus 6466, an 18.9% margin.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7535U win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins three of the 17 head-to-head tests. It leads in PassMark integer math (62109 vs 57987, +7.1%), PassMark data encryption (12706 vs 12493, +1.7%), and Cinebench R15 single-core (225 vs 220, +2.3%).

Q: Are these processors compatible with the same motherboard?

A: No. The 7535U uses AMD Socket FP7, while the 220 uses AMD Socket FP8. They are physically different and require different platforms.

Q: What memory features differ between them?

A: Both support DDR5 dual-channel memory, but the 220 has higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the 7535U. The 7535U supports ECC memory, while the 220 does not.

Q: How do their clock speeds compare?

A: The 220 has a higher base clock of 3.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The 7535U has a base of 2.90 GHz and boost of 4.55 GHz.

Q: Which has better integrated graphics?

A: The 220 features a Radeon 740M, while the 7535U has a Radeon 660M. The benchmark data does not include graphics tests, so the performance difference is not quantified here.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights only the fields where the two processors differ:

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7535U | AMD Ryzen 5 220 |

|----------------|-------------------|-----------------|

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen 4 |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Hawk Point |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 137 mm² |

| Transistors | Not specified | 20,900 million |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 3.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.55 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Radeon 740M |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2025-01-05 |

| Part Number | 100-000000988(FP7)100-000000992(FP7r2) | 100-000001611 |

Both have 6 cores, 12 threads, 28 W TDP, 64 KB L1 per core, 16 MB shared L3, DDR5 dual-channel memory support, and are not multiplier unlocked. They are both active mobile parts from AMD.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Ryzen 5 220 dominates the benchmark suite, winning 14 of the 17 tests. The largest margin is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the 220 scores 15502 against the 7535U’s 8591, a 44.6% lead. This is a massive gap that indicates the 220’s Zen 4 architecture and higher clocks translate directly into multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R23 single-core also favors the 220 by 35.4% (2188 vs 1414), showing the IPC and clock advantage carries over to lightly-threaded tasks.

In Geekbench, the 220 leads by 18.9% in multi-core (7974 vs 6466) and 21% in single-core (2027 vs 1602). PassMark multi-thread shows a narrower but still clear 8.3% lead for the 220 (18582 vs 17039). The 220 also wins in Cinebench R15 multi-core by 14.9% (1562 vs 1330), PassMark extended instructions by 15% (15512 vs 13187), PassMark physics by 14.6% (983 vs 839), random string sorting by 16.4% (25433 vs 21267), find prime numbers by 23.1% (65 vs 50), floating point math by 4.3% (35500 vs 33971), data compression by 5.9% (212739 vs 200252), and single-thread by 12.2% (3646 vs 3203).

The 7535U’s wins are more limited but noteworthy. Its PassMark integer math score of 62109 beats the 220’s 57987 by 7.1%, which is a substantial lead in that specific test. It also edges out the 220 in PassMark data encryption (12706 vs 12493, +1.7%) and Cinebench R15 single-core (225 vs 220, +2.3%). These wins suggest the 7535U retains an advantage in certain integer-heavy or legacy single-threaded instruction paths, despite being an older architecture.

The overall picture is unambiguous: the Ryzen 5 220 is faster in nearly every meaningful metric, with its multi-core lead being particularly pronounced.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 220 is the go-to choice for any workload that benefits from raw multi-core throughput. Its 44.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core makes it ideal for video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The 35.4% single-core advantage in the same suite also means faster response in general desktop tasks, web browsing, and office productivity. The 18.9% Geekbench multi-core lead reinforces this as a general-purpose powerhouse, and the 12.2% PassMark single-thread lead shows it handles everyday apps with more headroom. For users running physics simulations (14.6% lead in PassMark physics) or heavy data compression (5.9% lead), the 220 is clearly superior.

The Ryzen 5 7535U’s wins point to a narrower set of use cases. Its 7.1% lead in PassMark integer math suggests it may be better for specific algorithmic or cryptographic workloads that rely on integer operations, despite being slower overall. The 1.7% lead in data encryption is marginal but could matter for security-focused tasks. The 2.3% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core is an anomaly in an older test, but it indicates that the 7535U is not entirely outclassed in legacy single-threaded environments. Additionally, the 7535U’s ECC memory support makes it a viable choice for low-end workstations or servers where data integrity is paramount, a feature the 220 lacks entirely.

In practical terms, the 220 is the better processor for nearly all modern workloads. The 7535U is only preferable if you specifically need ECC memory or if your software is heavily dependent on integer math and encryption—and even then, the margins are small or inconsistent. For a balanced, future-proof mobile platform, the Ryzen 5 220 is the data-backed recommendation.