CPU Comparison

The Intel Xeon E-2276M and AMD Ryzen 5 1500X are both 14 nm processors with 6 and 4 cores respectively, yet they land at nearly identical average benchmark scores (1996 vs 1992), placing both at the 44th percentile of all CPUs. This head-to-head analysis reveals a stark split: the Xeon wins modern multi-threaded and Geekbench tests, while the Ryzen dominates older Cinebench versions and single-core R15/R23 runs.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276M edges out the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X by 0.2%, scoring 1996 versus 1992 in average benchmark score.

Q: How do the two CPUs compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276M wins decisively, scoring 5400 against the Ryzen 5 1500X's 4597, a 17.5% advantage.

Q: Which CPU performs better in Geekbench single-core?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276M leads with a score of 1440 versus 1122 for the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X, a 28.3% margin.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each?

A: The Xeon E-2276M has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 1500X has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon E-2276M and the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276M boosts to 4.70 GHz, compared to 3.70 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear choice based on workload type. For multi-threaded rendering in modern benchmarks like Cinebench R23, the Intel Xeon E-2276M is the superior part, delivering 17.5% higher scores. Its advantage grows further in Geekbench, where it leads by 19.3% in multi-core and 28.3% in single-core, suggesting better overall system responsiveness and integer performance. The Ryzen 5 1500X, however, takes the crown in legacy Cinebench R15 tests, showing 32.4% and 50.6% leads in multi-core and single-core respectively. This makes the Ryzen the pick for users running older software or comparing against historical data. The Xeon's 45 W TDP versus the Ryzen's 65 W TDP also points to the Intel part being the more efficient choice for sustained workloads in constrained thermal environments. Desktop builders on Socket AM4 will prefer the Ryzen for its unlocked multiplier, while workstation buyers needing the Xeon's integrated UHD Graphics P630 and server-grade positioning should opt for the Intel part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results reveal a split decision, with each CPU winning exactly 3 of the 6 tests. The most striking victory for the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X comes in Cinebench R15 single-core, where it scores 154 against the Xeon's 76, a massive 50.6% delta. This is an outlier in the data set, far larger than any other single-test gap. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen again dominates, scoring 805 versus 544, a 32.4% advantage that flips the expected core-count narrative, as the 4-core Ryzen beats the 6-core Xeon in this older benchmark version.

The Intel Xeon E-2276M retaliates strongly in the modern Cinebench R23 multi-core test. Its score of 5400 surpasses the Ryzen's 4597 by 17.5%, indicating that the Xeon's architecture scales better with the newer rendering engine. The single-core R23 result favors the Ryzen again, with 947 versus 762, a 19.5% lead. This suggests that AMD's Zen core has a clock-for-clock single-thread advantage in this specific test, despite the Xeon's higher 4.70 GHz boost clock.

Geekbench results are entirely Intel's territory. The Xeon E-2276M posts 5159 in multi-core against the Ryzen's 4326, a 19.3% win. The single-core Geekbench gap is even wider at 28.3%, with 1440 versus 1122. These scores indicate that the Xeon's architecture delivers superior performance in this general-purpose benchmark, covering memory latency, encryption, and integer workloads. The overall pattern shows the Xeon leading in synthetic tests that stress modern instruction sets and memory subsystems, while the Ryzen retains an edge in legacy Cinebench tests that may rely on different instruction paths.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge significantly on core configuration. The Intel Xeon E-2276M packs 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X offers 4 cores and 8 threads. Clock speeds also differ: the Xeon has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost of 4.70 GHz, whereas the Ryzen runs at 3.50 GHz base and 3.70 GHz boost. Thermal design power favors Intel at 45 W versus AMD's 65 W.

Socket and platform details are distinct: the Xeon uses Intel BGA 1440, while the Ryzen uses AMD Socket AM4. The Xeon includes integrated UHD Graphics P630, but the Ryzen has no integrated graphics. Market segmentation differs as well, with the Xeon aimed at Server/Workstation and the Ryzen positioned for Desktop. The Xeon is end-of-life in production status, while the Ryzen remains active. The Xeon's multiplier is locked, but the Ryzen's is unlocked. The Xeon's die size is 154 mm², compared to the Ryzen's 213 mm², and the Ryzen has 4,800 million transistors versus no listed count for the Xeon.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. Intel's Xeon E-2276M is built on Coffee Lake architecture, specifically the Coffee Lake-H codename, while AMD's Ryzen 5 1500X uses the Zen architecture with the Summit Ridge codename. Both use a 14 nm process node, but Intel fabricates its chip in-house, whereas AMD relies on GlobalFoundries. Cache hierarchies differ: the Xeon provides 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, plus 12 MB shared L3; the Ryzen offers 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, with a larger 16 MB shared L3. This gives the Ryzen more per-core cache but less total L3 than the Xeon's shared pool.

Memory support is identical on paper: both handle DDR4 on a dual-channel bus with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. PCIe connectivity matches as well, with Gen 3 and 16 CPU lanes for each. The Xeon's integrated graphics is a key architectural feature absent from the Ryzen, making it a self-contained solution for systems without a discrete GPU. The Ryzen's unlocked multiplier reflects its desktop orientation, allowing overclocking, while the Xeon's locked multiplier aligns with workstation stability requirements. The release dates show a two-year gap, with the Ryzen launching in April 2017 and the Xeon in May 2019, yet the average scores remain within 0.2% of each other, underscoring how architectural efficiency can offset generational differences.