AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs Intel Xeon 6349P Comparison

# Intel Xeon 6349P vs AMD Ryzen 5 150

The Intel Xeon 6349P and AMD Ryzen 5 150 both sit at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, with average benchmark scores of 34890 and 34881 respectively — a 0% delta that makes them statistical twins in aggregate. Yet the head-to-head data tells a very different story: the Xeon 6349P wins all 11 shared benchmark comparisons, often by wide margins. The Ryzen 5 150's overall parity comes from its position in a different performance ecosystem, not from matching the Xeon in any measured workload. This makes the pair a study in how two 6-core, 12-thread processors can post nearly identical average scores while producing completely different workload profiles.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon 6349P wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. It sweeps all 11 tests, with deltas ranging from 21% in data encryption to a massive 91.5% in find prime numbers. The Xeon's dominance is most pronounced in physics (74.7% ahead), floating point math (76% ahead), and multithreaded workloads (47.5% ahead). For data compression, the Xeon posts 306774 versus the Ryzen's 211289 — a 45.2% advantage. Even in single-thread performance, where the Ryzen's architecture might be expected to compete, the Xeon leads by 43.5% with a score of 4528 against 3155.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 wins no benchmarks outright. Its only consolation is the aggregate score, where it trails by a negligible 9 points (34881 vs 34890). This near-identical average, however, masks the fact that the Ryzen's performance profile is uniformly lower across every measured metric. The Ryzen's closest relative performance comes in data encryption, where it trails by 21% — still a decisive loss. The data shows no workload category where the Ryzen 5 150 takes the lead, making it a clear second choice for any compute-intensive task measured in this comparison.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon 6349P uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process from Intel's own foundry, with a die size of 163 mm². It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boosts to 5.70 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 employs Zen 3+ architecture (codenamed Rembrandt-R) on a 6 nm process from TSMC, with a larger die at 210 mm². Its clocks are substantially lower: 3.30 GHz base and 4.55 GHz boost.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The Xeon provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen offers 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The Xeon's larger per-core caches and bigger L3 pool give it a structural advantage in cache-sensitive workloads. Memory support also diverges: the Xeon supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ryzen is DDR5-only. The Ryzen does list a memory bandwidth figure of 76.8 GB/s, a spec the Xeon does not provide.

Socket and platform targets could not be more different. The Xeon uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a Server/Workstation part with ECC memory support. The Ryzen uses AMD Socket FP7, targets the Mobile segment, and lacks ECC support. The Xeon offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes; the Ryzen provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Ryzen includes integrated Radeon 660M graphics, while the Xeon has no integrated graphics at all. The Xeon's launch MSRP is $509; the Ryzen has no listed launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The biggest single win for the Intel Xeon 6349P comes in passmark_find_prime_numbers, where it scores 90 against the Ryzen's 47 — a 91.5% advantage that nearly doubles the AMD part's output. This is an extreme outlier even within the Xeon's sweep, suggesting the workload heavily favors the Intel architecture's integer processing pipeline. Floating point math follows closely behind: the Xeon's 61796 versus 35118 represents a 76% lead, indicating substantial superiority in scientific and engineering calculations.

Physics simulation shows a 74.7% gap, with the Xeon scoring 1408 against the Ryzen's 806. This is the third-largest delta and reinforces the pattern that the Xeon's higher clocks and larger caches translate into decisive wins in compute-heavy tasks. Multithreaded performance shows a 47.5% advantage (25793 vs 17492), and data compression shows 45.2% (306774 vs 211289). The Xeon also leads by 43.5% in both single-thread benchmarks, scoring 4528 in both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread against the Ryzen's identical 3155.

The narrower margins still favor Intel decisively. Extended instructions show a 39.2% gap (20426 vs 14675), random string sorting shows 38.8% (31056 vs 22382), and integer math shows 32.6% (82443 vs 62151). The smallest delta is data encryption at 21% (16239 vs 13425), yet even here the Xeon outperforms by a fifth. Across all 11 comparisons, the Xeon's average delta is roughly 50%, making this less a competitive matchup and more a demonstration of architectural supremacy in every measured area.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every specification that matters. Clock speeds: the Xeon runs at 3.60 GHz base and 5.70 GHz boost, versus the Ryzen's 3.30 GHz base and 4.55 GHz boost. Thermal design power: the Xeon is rated at 95 TDP, while the Ryzen draws only 35 TDP — a 60-point difference that reflects the Ryzen's mobile orientation. Process node: Intel uses 10 nm, AMD uses 6 nm. Foundry: Intel manufactures its own chip, while TSMC produces the AMD part.

Cache configurations diverge across all levels. L1 cache is 80 KB per core on the Xeon versus 64 KB per core on the Ryzen. L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core versus 512 KB per core. L3 cache is 18 MB shared versus 16 MB shared. Die size: 163 mm² for Intel, 210 mm² for AMD. Memory support: the Xeon accepts DDR4 and DDR5, the Ryzen only DDR5. PCIe: Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel, Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD.

Socket and platform: Intel Socket 1700 for the Xeon, AMD Socket FP7 for the Ryzen. Market segment: Server/Workstation versus Mobile. ECC memory: supported on the Xeon, not on the Ryzen. Integrated graphics: none on the Xeon, Radeon 660M on the Ryzen. Release dates differ by about seven months: the Xeon launched on 2025-02-23, the Ryzen on 2025-09-30. Part numbers are SRPLT for Intel and 100-000000990(FP7r2) for AMD. Both are active production parts, both have locked multipliers.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon 6349P boosts to 5.70 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 boosts to 4.55 GHz — a difference of 1.15 GHz in Intel's favor.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 150 support ECC memory?

A: No. The Ryzen 5 150 lacks ECC support, while the Intel Xeon 6349P supports ECC memory, consistent with its Server/Workstation market segment.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in passmark_find_prime_numbers, where the Xeon scores 90 versus the Ryzen's 47, a 91.5% advantage for Intel.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Xeon 6349P has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon 6349P and AMD Ryzen 5 150 have 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 includes Radeon 660M integrated graphics. The Intel Xeon 6349P has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The Intel Xeon 6349P is rated at 95 TDP, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 is rated at 35 TDP — a 60-point difference that reflects the Ryzen's mobile design.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the Intel Xeon 6349P is the superior processor in every measured benchmark. It wins all 11 head-to-head tests, with deltas ranging from 21% to 91.5%. The Ryzen 5 150's aggregate score of 34881 nearly matches the Xeon's 34890, but this parity is misleading — the Ryzen never wins a single workload, and its closest result is a 21% deficit in data encryption. The Xeon's advantages in physics (74.7%), floating point math (76%), and prime number finding (91.5%) make it the obvious choice for compute-intensive server or workstation tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 should be considered only by users who prioritize its specific platform characteristics: a 35 TDP footprint, mobile Socket FP7 compatibility, integrated Radeon 660M graphics, and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Its DDR5-only memory support and lack of ECC further position it as a mobile part rather than a server contender. The Xeon's higher clocks, larger caches, ECC support, and Server/Workstation classification make it the data-driven pick for anyone needing raw performance. The Ryzen's only statistical claim is the near-identical average score, which fails to translate into a single benchmark win. For buyers choosing between these two, the benchmark results are unambiguous: the Xeon 6349P wins outright on performance, while the Ryzen 5 150 offers a lower-power, graphics-equipped alternative with no performance advantages in this comparison.