AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs Intel Core i7-13800H Comparison

The Intel Core i7-13800H and AMD Ryzen 5 150 are two mobile processors that, despite landing at the same 84th percentile among all CPUs, deliver vastly different performance profiles. The benchmark data reveals a comprehensive sweep by the Intel part across every measured workload, yet the AMD chip’s efficiency-driven design and architectural choices tell a more nuanced story than the raw scoreboard suggests. Both processors achieve a near-identical average benchmark score, with the Intel i7-13800H at 34988 and the AMD Ryzen 5 150 at 34881, a difference of just 0.3%, yet the individual test results show the Intel chip winning all 11 head-to-head comparisons by substantial margins.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking disparity appears in the PassMark physics test, where the Intel Core i7-13800H scores 1924 against the AMD Ryzen 5 150’s 806, a massive 138.7% advantage. This result suggests the Intel processor’s core configuration and higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz provide a decisive edge in physics simulations that leverage raw multi-threaded throughput. Similarly, the find prime numbers workload shows the Intel chip scoring 115 versus 47 for the AMD part, a 144.7% lead that indicates a significant advantage in integer-heavy, latency-sensitive operations.

Floating-point math presents another major gap, with Intel’s 66579 score dwarfing AMD’s 35118, an 89.6% difference. This workload benefits from the Intel chip’s 14 cores and 20 threads, which nearly double the AMD processor’s 6 cores and 12 threads. The multithread benchmark reinforces this pattern: Intel scores 26545 versus AMD’s 17492, a 51.8% win that directly reflects the core count disparity. Even in integer math, where the gap is smaller but still pronounced, Intel’s 92589 beats AMD’s 62151 by 49%. The data compression test shows Intel ahead at 299179 versus 211289, a 41.6% margin, while random string sorting sees Intel win 33188 to 22382, a 48.3% difference.

The closest contest occurs in single-thread performance, where Intel’s 3543 score edges AMD’s 3155 by 12.3%. This narrower gap highlights that while the AMD Ryzen 5 150’s 4.55 GHz boost clock is competitive, it cannot fully overcome Intel’s architectural efficiency in single-core tasks. Data encryption shows Intel winning 17726 to 13425, a 32% margin, and extended instructions favor Intel at 18011 versus 14675, a 22.7% lead. Across all 11 head-to-head benchmarks, the Intel Core i7-13800H emerges victorious, with no workload favoring the AMD Ryzen 5 150.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally favors the Intel Core i7-13800H for users prioritizing raw computational performance. Every benchmark in the comparison shows Intel winning, with margins ranging from a modest 12.3% in single-threaded tasks to over 140% in prime number calculation. The Intel chip’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide a structural advantage that the AMD Ryzen 5 150’s 6 cores and 12 threads cannot overcome, particularly in multi-threaded workloads like physics simulation and floating-point math. For content creators, developers, or analysts running parallel workloads, the Intel part is the clear choice based on this data.

However, the AMD Ryzen 5 150 warrants consideration for scenarios where power efficiency takes precedence. Its 35 W TDP is significantly lower than Intel’s 45 W TDP, and it achieves an average benchmark score within 0.3% of the Intel chip despite far fewer cores. The AMD processor also offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, compared to Intel’s 8 Gen 5 lanes, which could benefit systems requiring more direct high-speed connectivity. Users who prioritize battery life or thermal headroom in a thin-and-light chassis may prefer the AMD option, though they must accept substantially lower performance in every measured workload.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is substantial. The Intel Core i7-13800H uses Raptor Lake-H architecture built on a 10 nm process by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². It employs a hybrid core design totaling 14 cores and 20 threads, supported by 24 MB of shared L3 cache, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. This design allows the chip to reach a 5.20 GHz boost clock from a 2.50 GHz base clock, with a 45 W TDP. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150, by contrast, uses Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process with a smaller 210 mm² die. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 64 KB of L1 cache per core. The base clock is 3.30 GHz, boosting to 4.55 GHz, all within a 35 W TDP. AMD’s chip supports only DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a specified memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and integrates Radeon 660M graphics. The AMD processor relies on PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while Intel offers PCIe Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes.

These differences explain the benchmark outcomes. Intel’s higher core count and thread count provide more parallel execution resources, while its larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB) helps with data-heavy workloads. The AMD chip’s smaller process node and lower TDP suggest better power efficiency, but its fewer cores and lower boost clock constrain peak performance. The Intel part also launched on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $457, while the AMD processor’s release date of 2025-09-30 and lack of a launch MSRP field make direct market positioning difficult to assess from the data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13800H wins decisively, scoring 26545 in the PassMark multithread test versus the AMD Ryzen 5 150’s 17492, a 51.8% advantage. This aligns with Intel’s 14 cores and 20 threads compared to AMD’s 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How close is single-thread performance between the two?

A: The gap is much narrower, with Intel scoring 3543 and AMD scoring 3155 in the PassMark single-thread test, a 12.3% difference. Both chips have competitive boost clocks, but Intel’s 5.20 GHz edge over AMD’s 4.55 GHz helps it pull ahead.

Q: What workload shows the biggest performance gap?

A: The find prime numbers test shows the largest relative difference, with Intel scoring 115 versus AMD’s 47, a 144.7% lead. This indicates a significant advantage in integer-heavy, latency-sensitive computation for the Intel part.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 150 win in any benchmark?

A: No. Across all 11 head-to-head benchmarks, the Intel Core i7-13800H wins every single test. The AMD chip’s closest result is in single-thread performance, where it still trails by 12.3%.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i7-13800H has an average benchmark score of 34988, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 scores 34881, putting them within 0.3% of each other. Both hold the 84th percentile among all CPUs, indicating comparable overall standing despite the individual test disparities.

Q: What memory and expansion differences exist?

A: Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while AMD supports only DDR5. The AMD chip offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, whereas Intel provides 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. AMD also specifies a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, a figure not listed for Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13800H wins in every benchmark category recorded, making it the superior choice for performance-sensitive applications. Its 41.6% lead in data compression and 48.3% advantage in random string sorting make it ideal for database operations, file archiving, and text processing tasks. The 89.6% margin in floating-point math suits scientific computing, financial modeling, and 3D rendering, while the 49% edge in integer math benefits general productivity software and compilers. The 138.7% physics win and 144.7% prime number advantage indicate strong performance in simulation, gaming physics, and cryptographic workloads. The Intel chip’s 32% lead in data encryption and 22.7% advantage in extended instructions further solidify its position for security and multimedia processing.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150, despite losing all benchmarks, has a clear role for users prioritizing efficiency and connectivity. Its 35 W TDP versus Intel’s 45 W suggests longer battery life and cooler operation in portable devices. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for more simultaneous high-speed device connections, such as multiple NVMe drives or external GPUs, compared to Intel’s 8 Gen 5 lanes. The AMD chip’s 6 nm TSMC process and 210 mm² die also indicate a more compact, potentially more power-efficient design. For users who value these attributes over raw performance, the AMD processor may be the pragmatic choice, though the data shows no workload where it outperforms the Intel part.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specification fields. The Intel Core i7-13800H features 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel’s base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, compared to AMD’s 3.30 GHz base and 4.55 GHz boost. The TDP differs significantly: Intel draws 45 W versus AMD’s 35 W. Intel uses an Intel BGA 1744 socket with Raptor Lake architecture, while AMD uses an AMD Socket FP7 with Zen 3+ architecture. The process nodes differ, with Intel at 10 nm and AMD at 6 nm, and the dies measure 257 mm² for Intel and 210 mm² for AMD.

Cache configurations also diverge: Intel provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while AMD offers 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Memory support sees Intel accepting both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD is DDR5-only, though AMD specifies a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. PCIe connectivity differs, with Intel offering Gen 5 with 8 lanes and AMD offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while AMD uses Radeon 660M. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $457, while the AMD processor has no listed launch MSRP. The release dates also differ, with Intel launching on 2023-01-03 and AMD on 2025-09-30.