AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs Intel Core i5-13600T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive sweep in the head-to-head comparisons. The Intel Core i5-13600T won all 11 benchmark comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 5 150, with the database listing zero wins for the AMD part. The largest margin appears in floating-point math, where the Intel chip scored 70,152 against 35,118 for the AMD chip, a delta of 99.8%. This effectively doubles the AMD processor's throughput in that specific workload, indicating a substantial advantage in scientific or simulation-oriented tasks that rely heavily on FPU performance.

Multi-threaded performance follows a similar pattern. In the PassMark multithread test, the Intel Core i5-13600T scored 27,098 versus 17,492 for the AMD Ryzen 5 150, a 54.9% advantage. The same 54.9% delta appears in integer math, with scores of 96,299 and 62,151 respectively. These parallel results suggest that the Intel processor's advantage scales consistently across both integer and mixed workload types, likely reflecting its higher core and thread counts.

The single-thread comparison is narrower but still favors Intel. The Core i5-13600T scored 3,728 in PassMark single-thread testing, while the Ryzen 5 150 scored 3,155, a delta of 18.2%. This smaller gap indicates that while the AMD chip is competitive in lightly threaded tasks, it still trails by a meaningful margin in raw per-core performance. The data shows that the Intel chip also leads in prime number finding (82 versus 47, a 74.5% delta), which is a classic test of branch prediction and integer execution efficiency.

Data compression and encryption workloads also favor Intel heavily. In data compression, the Intel chip scored 337,893 against 211,289, a 59.9% delta. In encryption, the margin is 43.9%, with scores of 19,320 and 13,425 respectively. These results suggest that the Intel processor is better suited for file archiving, database compression, and cryptographic workloads such as VPN termination or disk encryption. The extended instructions test, which measures SIMD and vector processing capabilities, shows a 40.7% lead for Intel (20,651 versus 14,675), indicating better performance in multimedia encoding and scientific vector math.

Random string sorting, a test that stresses memory access patterns and cache hierarchy, shows a 62.7% advantage for Intel (36,413 versus 22,382). The physics test, which simulates rigid body dynamics, shows a 59.7% lead (1,287 versus 806). These two results point to a strong memory subsystem and cache design on the Intel side. Overall, the head-to-head data leaves no ambiguity: the Intel Core i5-13600T outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 150 in every measured category, with margins ranging from 18.2% to 99.8%.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the Intel Core i5-13600T is the clear performance winner. It wins 11 out of 11 head-to-head comparisons, with no benchmark where the AMD Ryzen 5 150 takes the lead. The average benchmark score for the Intel chip is 35,305, while the AMD chip averages 34,881, a difference of 424 points. The Intel chip also holds a marginally higher percentile ranking among all CPUs: 85th percentile versus 84th for the AMD part.

The data suggests that the Intel Core i5-13600T should be the pick for anyone prioritizing raw compute throughput, particularly in multi-threaded, floating-point, or memory-intensive workloads. Its 99.8% lead in floating-point math and 74.5% lead in prime number finding make it the obvious choice for scientific computing, engineering simulations, or any task that stresses the FPU. The 54.9% leads in both multithread and integer math also make it the better choice for video rendering, code compilation, and data processing.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150, while slower across the board, still has a place. Its single-thread deficit of 18.2% is the smallest gap in the entire comparison, meaning that in lightly threaded applications such as web browsing, office productivity, or older games that rely on one or two cores, the user experience would be closer between the two. The AMD chip also has a lower average benchmark score, but its 84th percentile ranking shows it remains a capable processor relative to the broader CPU market. However, given that the Intel chip matches or beats it in every recorded test, the AMD part cannot be recommended on raw performance grounds from this data alone.

The database also places each chip among different rivals. The Intel Core i5-13600T sits near the Intel Core i7-12700K (0% delta), the Intel Core i7-12700KF (-0.2%), the Intel Core i7-13700T (-0.3%), and the Intel Core 5 213PE (-0.3%). The AMD Ryzen 5 150 sits near the Intel Xeon 6349P (0% delta), the Intel Core 7 253PTE (-0.2%), the Intel Core i7-13800H (-0.3%), and the Intel Core i9-12900HX (-0.3%). This context shows that the Intel chip is competing with higher-tier desktop parts, while the AMD chip is trading blows with mobile and Xeon variants, reinforcing that the Intel chip is the stronger overall performer.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T wins all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 5 150. The AMD chip records zero wins in the database.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in floating-point math, where the Intel Core i5-13600T scores 70,152 versus 35,118 for the AMD Ryzen 5 150, a 99.8% delta. This means the Intel chip nearly doubles the AMD chip's throughput in that workload.

Q: How do the two compare in single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 3,728 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 scores 3,155. This gives the Intel chip an 18.2% advantage, which is the smallest margin of any head-to-head test.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35,305, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 has an average of 34,881. The difference is 424 points in favor of the Intel chip.

Q: Which processor ranks higher among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T is in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 is in the 84th percentile. Both are near the top of the overall distribution.

Q: Does the AMD chip win any category?

A: No. The database records zero wins for the AMD Ryzen 5 150 across all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i5-13600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 4800 MHz, while the AMD chip has a base clock of 3300 MHz and a boost clock of 4550 MHz. Despite the AMD chip's higher base clock, the Intel chip's higher boost clock and larger core count give it the overall performance edge.

The cache hierarchies are also notably different. The Intel chip features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip's larger L3 cache and per-core L2 cache likely contribute to its strong showing in memory-sensitive tests like random string sorting.

Memory support differs as well. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD chip supports only DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The AMD chip has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel chip has no recorded bandwidth figure in the database. The Intel chip supports ECC memory, while the AMD chip does not.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The AMD chip offers more total lanes but on an older generation standard. The integrated graphics differ as well: the Intel chip has UHD Graphics 770, while the AMD chip has Radeon 660M.

The form factors and sockets are distinct. The Intel chip uses the Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop part, while the AMD chip uses the AMD Socket FP7 and is classified as a mobile part. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $255, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The architectural lineage separates the two clearly. The Intel Core i5-13600T is built on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die, and belongs to the Core 13th Gen family. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 uses Zen 3+, with the codename Rembrandt-R, and belongs to the Ryzen 5 generation built on Zen 3+ (Rembrandt). These are fundamentally different designs from different eras of each company's roadmap.

The manufacturing process differs significantly. The Intel chip is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry, with a die size of 215 mm². The AMD chip uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 210 mm². The AMD chip uses a smaller process node, but the Intel chip packs more cores and cache into a slightly larger die. The foundry difference is notable: Intel uses its own manufacturing, while AMD outsources to TSMC.

The core and thread configuration reflects different design philosophies. The Intel chip's 14 cores and 20 threads suggest a hybrid architecture with a mix of performance and efficiency cores, which is typical of Raptor Lake designs. The AMD chip's 6 cores and 12 threads indicate a more conventional symmetric multi-core design. The Intel chip also has significantly more cache: 24 MB of L3 shared cache versus 16 MB on the AMD chip, plus larger L1 and L2 per-core allocations.

Feature support diverges on memory and I/O. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory and includes ECC support, while the AMD chip is DDR5-only and lacks ECC. The Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Intel chip's newer PCIe generation offers higher bandwidth per lane, while the AMD chip offers more total lanes. The integrated GPU also differs: Intel's UHD Graphics 770 versus AMD's Radeon 660M, with no benchmark data comparing their graphics performance.

Release timing also differs. The Intel chip was released on January 3, 2023, while the AMD chip has a release date of September 30, 2025. The AMD chip is a later product, but the data shows it does not outpace the older Intel design in any tested workload. Both processors are listed as active in production status.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13600T wins in every measured category, but the size of its advantage varies by workload type. The largest margins are in floating-point math (99.8% delta), prime number finding (74.5% delta), and random string sorting (62.7% delta). These results indicate that the Intel chip is particularly strong in scientific computing, financial modeling, cryptography, and any task that involves complex mathematical operations or heavy memory access patterns. The 54.9% leads in both multithread and integer math also make it the clear choice for video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and data analysis tasks that can utilize all available threads.

The Intel chip's 59.9% lead in data compression and 43.9% lead in encryption point to advantages in file archiving, database management, and secure communications workloads. Its 40.7% lead in extended instructions (SIMD/vector processing) makes it suitable for multimedia processing, image manipulation, and signal processing. For users running virtual machines, containerized workloads, or parallel batch processing, the Intel chip's 20 threads give it a substantial throughput advantage over the AMD chip's 12 threads.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150, despite losing all head-to-head tests, has its closest showing in single-threaded performance (18.2% delta). This means that in everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, or legacy software that uses only one or two threads, the AMD chip would feel closer in responsiveness to the Intel chip. The AMD chip also has a higher base clock (3300 MHz versus 1800 MHz), which may help in bursty, short-duration workloads that do not sustain boost clocks for long periods. Its mobile form factor and smaller die size (210 mm²) suggest it is designed for power-constrained or portable systems, where the Intel chip's desktop socket and larger cache might be less practical.

However, the data does not support any category where the AMD chip outright wins. The closest margins are still comfortable Intel victories. For workloads dominated by floating-point math, the AMD chip is nearly twice as slow. For multi-threaded tasks, it trails by over half. The AMD chip's only potential advantage lies in its mobile socket, which could make it suitable for compact or battery-powered systems, but the benchmark data shows that even in that context, the Intel chip would deliver more raw performance if power and thermals allowed. The verdict from the measurements is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-13600T is the superior processor in every tested benchmark category.