AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data set for this comparison contains eleven shared benchmark results. The Intel Core 7 251TE wins all eleven of those direct comparisons. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 does not register a single head-to-head win in the database. This is not a close contest in any individual workload category, and the margins are consistently large.

The largest single gap appears in the prime number search test. The Intel part scores 140, while the AMD part scores 47. That puts the Intel processor 66.4% ahead. The floating point math workload shows a similar pattern: Intel scores 85607 against AMD's 35118, a 59% deficit for the AMD chip. The physics test also favors Intel heavily, with scores of 1938 versus 806, a 58.4% difference.

The integer math test delivers a 50.6% advantage for Intel, with scores of 125739 against 62151. The random string sorting test shows Intel ahead by 43.5%, scoring 39643 versus 22382. Multithreaded performance, often the headline metric for productivity comparisons, shows Intel at 30022 and AMD at 17492, a 41.7% lead for the Intel processor. Data compression follows with Intel at 334399 and AMD at 211289, a 36.8% margin.

The encryption workload shows Intel scoring 22176 against AMD's 13425, a 39.5% gap. Extended instructions show a narrower but still decisive difference: Intel at 16974, AMD at 14675, a 13.5% lead. The single-thread tests, measured twice in the database under slightly different labels, show Intel at 3568 and AMD at 3155, an 11.6% advantage for Intel.

The smallest margins are in single-thread and extended instruction workloads, where the AMD architecture is relatively closer. The largest margins are in prime number search, floating point, physics, integer math, and multithreaded workloads, where the Intel chip's core count advantage becomes decisive. Across the entire head-to-head set, the Intel Core 7 251TE wins every recorded comparison, and the average benchmark score reflects that dominance: 41650 for Intel versus 34881 for AMD.

The database also places both processors in context against other CPUs. The Intel Core 7 251TE sits at the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 sits at the 84th percentile. The Intel part's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (average score 41621, a 0.1% difference), the Intel Core i7-14650HX (41576, 0.2% ahead of Intel), the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779, 0.3% behind), and the Intel Core i7-14700T (41914, 0.6% behind). The AMD part's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6349P (34890, a 0% difference), the Intel Core 7 253PTE (34962, 0.2% ahead of AMD), the Intel Core i7-13800H (34988, 0.3% ahead), and the Intel Core i9-12900HX (35003, 0.3% ahead). The Intel Core 7 251TE therefore competes in a higher average score bracket than the AMD Ryzen 5 150.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 251TE wins every direct benchmark category in the database. That makes the "where each one wins" section one-sided in terms of recorded measurements. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has no head-to-head wins, so the use-case split must be derived from the shape of the results rather than from any AMD victory.

For workloads that stress many cores simultaneously, the Intel chip is the clear choice. The multithread score of 30022 versus 17492, the floating point score of 85607 versus 35118, and the integer score of 125739 versus 62151 all point to a processor that handles parallel work with far more throughput. The physics test, which often reflects simulation and gaming physics workloads, reinforces this with 1938 versus 806. The prime number search result, 140 versus 47, suggests the Intel part also handles repeated small integer operations much faster, which matters for certain scientific and financial workloads.

For single-thread performance, the Intel part still leads, but by a smaller margin. The single-thread score of 3568 versus 3155 is an 11.6% advantage. This suggests that in lightly threaded applications, such as older software or tasks with a strict serial dependency, the Intel chip remains faster but not overwhelmingly so. The extended instructions score, 16974 versus 14675, also shows a relatively modest 13.5% gap, indicating that the AMD chip's instruction execution is comparatively competitive in that specific area.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 does show one notable structural advantage that does not appear in the head-to-head benchmark table: power consumption. The AMD chip has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 45 watts. The database does not include power efficiency benchmarks, so no direct performance-per-watt score can be cited. However, the lower TDP combined with the mobile market segment classification for the AMD part indicates that it is designed for systems with tighter thermal and power budgets. The Intel part is classified as a desktop processor.

The AMD chip also uses a smaller process node, 6 nm from TSMC, versus Intel's 10 nm node. The database does not provide a direct efficiency measurement, but the combination of lower TDP, smaller node, and mobile classification suggests the AMD part is better suited to compact systems where power draw is a primary constraint. The Intel part, with its larger core count and higher TDP, is better suited to workloads where raw throughput matters more than power consumption.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and different manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 251TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The process node difference is significant: AMD's 6 nm node is smaller, which typically allows for higher transistor density and lower power draw per unit of work.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel chip has 24 cores and 32 threads. That 18-core difference is the primary driver of the multithreaded benchmark results. The AMD chip relies on simultaneous multithreading to reach 12 threads from 6 physical cores. The Intel chip reaches 32 threads from 24 physical cores, meaning that even without counting thread duplication, the Intel part has four times the physical core count.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part therefore has more cache at every level on a per-core basis, and more than double the total L3 cache. This likely contributes to the Intel chip's advantage in data compression and random string sorting, workloads that benefit from larger caches.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD chip supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, and has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, while the AMD part does not. For systems that require error-correcting memory, the Intel chip is the only option of the two.

PCIe generation and lane counts differ. The AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. The Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part has a newer PCIe standard, which offers higher per-lane bandwidth, but the AMD part has more total lanes. The database does not include a direct PCIe bandwidth benchmark, so the practical impact depends on the expansion devices used.

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD chip uses a Radeon 660M graphics solution. The Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770. The database does not include graphics benchmarks for either chip, so no direct comparison of integrated graphics performance can be made from this data. Both parts do include an integrated GPU, which means neither requires a discrete graphics card for basic display output.

The sockets and market segments differ. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP7 and is classified as a mobile processor. The Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop processor. This aligns with the TDP difference: the AMD chip is designed for laptops and compact mobile systems, while the Intel chip is designed for desktop motherboards with more generous cooling and power delivery.

Release dates also differ. The AMD chip has a recorded release date of September 30, 2025. The Intel chip has a recorded release date of January 12, 2025. The Intel part shipped earlier in the year, while the AMD part followed later in the year. Both parts are listed as active in production.

The die sizes are similar: 210 mm² for the AMD chip and 215 mm² for the Intel chip. Despite the Intel chip having four times the physical core count, its die is only slightly larger, reflecting the different process nodes and design approaches. The database does not include transistor counts for either processor.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core 7 251TE outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 150 in every single recorded head-to-head test. The margins range from 11.6% in single-thread performance to 66.4% in prime number search. The Intel chip also holds a higher percentile ranking (88th versus 84th) and a higher average benchmark score (41650 versus 34881).

For workloads that demand high multithreaded throughput, the Intel chip is the only rational choice based on the data. The multithread score of 30022 is 71.6% higher than the AMD chip's 17492. The floating point and integer math results show similar or larger gaps. Any application that scales across many cores will favor the Intel chip by a wide margin.

For single-thread performance, the Intel chip still wins, but the margin is smaller. The 11.6% single-thread advantage means that in lightly threaded workloads, the AMD chip is not far behind. However, "not far behind" is still a loss, and the Intel chip wins even this category.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 does have structural advantages that do not appear in the benchmark table. It consumes less power, with a 35 watt TDP versus 45 watts for Intel. It uses a smaller 6 nm process node. It is classified as a mobile processor and uses a mobile socket. For a system builder prioritizing low power draw in a compact mobile chassis, the AMD chip may be the appropriate choice despite its benchmark deficits.

The Intel Core 7 251TE also offers ECC memory support, which the AMD chip lacks. For workstation or server-adjacent workloads that require error correction, this is a decisive feature that no benchmark score can override. The Intel chip also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing more flexibility in memory selection, while the AMD chip is limited to DDR5.

The database records a launch MSRP of $384 for the Intel Core 7 251TE. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has no launch MSRP recorded.

The verdict from the data: the Intel Core 7 251TE is the stronger processor in every measured performance category. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 is the lower-power, mobile-classified alternative that trades substantial performance for a 10 watt lower TDP and a smaller process node. The choice between them depends on whether the system prioritizes raw performance or power efficiency, but on pure benchmark results, the Intel chip wins across the board.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE scores 3568 in the single-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 scores 3155. The Intel chip leads by 11.6%.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 does not.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has a TDP of 35 watts. The Intel Core 7 251TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has an average benchmark score of 41650. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has an average benchmark score of 34881.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 supports DDR5 memory only. The Intel Core 7 251TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 150 | Intel Core 7 251TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 24 |

| Threads | 12 | 32 |

| Base clock | 3.30 GHz | 1.40 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.55 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Not recorded |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Bartlett Lake |

| Process node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 210 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 512 KB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB shared | 36 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | September 30, 2025 | January 12, 2025 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | No |

| Production status | Active | Active |