AMD Ryzen 5 1400 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 and AMD Ryzen 5 1400 are both quad-core AMD parts, but they target different segments and eras. Benchmark data reveals a split decision: the embedded R2314 wins the modern Cinebench R23 multi-core test, while the older Ryzen 5 1400 dominates in single-core and legacy R15 tests. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical—1415 for the R2314 versus 1410 for the Ryzen 5 1400—placing both at the 37th percentile of all CPUs. This makes the choice between them a matter of workload and platform priorities rather than raw overall performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 scores 1415, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 scores 1410. The R2314 leads by a margin of 5 points, which corresponds to a 0.3% difference as shown in the nearestRivals data.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Ryzen Embedded R2314 wins decisively, scoring 4893 versus the Ryzen 5 1400's 3985. This represents a 22.8% advantage for the R2314 in this modern multi-threaded workload.

Q: Which CPU offers better single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 is clearly ahead in single-core tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 832 versus 690 for the R2314, a 17.1% lead. The gap widens dramatically in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Ryzen 5 1400 scores 133.75 versus 69 for the R2314, a 48.4% difference.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 and the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 include ECC memory support. They also share the same dual-channel DDR4 memory bus with an identical bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s.

Q: What are the key differences in socket and platform?

A: The Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses the AMD Socket FP5, while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses the AMD Socket AM4. Additionally, the R2314 includes integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics, whereas the Ryzen 5 1400 has no integrated graphics.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen Embedded R2314 has a boost clock of 3.50 GHz, slightly higher than the Ryzen 5 1400's boost clock of 3.40 GHz. However, the Ryzen 5 1400 has a significantly higher base clock of 3.20 GHz compared to 2.10 GHz for the R2314.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different generations of AMD's core architecture. The Ryzen Embedded R2314 is built on the Zen+ architecture with the codename Picasso, while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses the original Zen architecture with the codename Summit Ridge. This generational gap is reflected in the manufacturing process: the R2314 uses a 12 nm node, while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses a 14 nm node. Both are fabricated by GlobalFoundries, but the smaller node gives the R2314 a transistor density advantage — 4,940 million transistors packed into a 210 mm² die, versus 4,800 million transistors on a slightly larger 213 mm² die for the Ryzen 5 1400.

Both CPUs have four physical cores, but the threading capabilities diverge sharply. The Ryzen 5 1400 supports eight threads via Simultaneous Multithreading, while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 is limited to four threads with no SMT. This is a fundamental architectural difference that affects multi-threaded scaling. The cache hierarchy is also different: both have 96 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, but the R2314 has only 4 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Ryzen 5 1400 doubles that to 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

The embedded part compensates with a much lower thermal envelope. The R2314 has a 15 W TDP, while the Ryzen 5 1400 draws 65 W. This 50 W difference underscores their divergent design goals. The R2314 also integrates Radeon Vega 6 graphics, a feature entirely absent from the Ryzen 5 1400. The socket and platform ecosystems differ as well: FP5 for the embedded chip versus AM4 for the desktop chip. The Ryzen 5 1400 has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the R2314 is locked. Finally, the release dates are separated by over five years — June 2022 for the R2314 versus April 2017 for the Ryzen 5 1400.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results tell a story of two different performance profiles. The Ryzen 5 1400 wins three of the four head-to-head comparisons, but the single victory for the R2314 is the most modern and demanding test.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen 5 1400 scores 688 against 493 for the R2314, a 28.3% lead. This older test clearly favors the Ryzen 5 1400's eight threads and higher base clock. The single-core R15 result is even more lopsided: 133.75 for the Ryzen 5 1400 versus 69 for the R2314, a staggering 48.4% deficit for the embedded chip. This massive gap likely reflects the R2314's very low 2.10 GHz base clock and lack of turbo headroom in this legacy benchmark.

However, the picture changes with Cinebench R23. In the multi-core R23 test, the R2314 scores 4893, beating the Ryzen 5 1400's 3985 by 22.8%. This is a remarkable turnaround, given the R2314's 15 W TDP and lack of SMT. The newer benchmark appears to better utilize the Zen+ architecture's improvements, possibly through better power management and instruction scheduling. In R23 single-core, the Ryzen 5 1400 reasserts its advantage, scoring 832 versus 690, a 17.1% lead. While still a win for the Ryzen 5 1400, the margin is far narrower than in R15 single-core, suggesting the R2314's architectural refinements close some of the gap in modern workloads.

The overall win count is 3-1 in favor of the Ryzen 5 1400, but the R2314's R23 multi-core victory is significant because R23 is a current standard for CPU benchmarking. The average benchmark scores — 1415 for the R2314 and 1410 for the Ryzen 5 1400 — reflect this mixed picture, with the embedded chip holding a razor-thin edge. Both processors sit at the 37th percentile of all CPUs, and their nearestRivals lists are nearly identical, including the Intel Core i5-4460 and AMD Ryzen 7 2700U with matching scores of 1415.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The Ryzen Embedded R2314 has a base clock of 2.10 GHz, while the Ryzen 5 1400 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz. Boost clocks are closer: 3.50 GHz for the R2314 versus 3.40 GHz for the Ryzen 5 1400. Thread counts differ significantly, with the R2314 offering 4 threads and the Ryzen 5 1400 offering 8 threads. The TDP is dramatically different at 15 W for the R2314 versus 65 W for the Ryzen 5 1400.

The socket and platform are incompatible: the R2314 uses AMD Socket FP5, while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses AMD Socket AM4. The architecture generation differs, with Zen+ (Picasso) for the R2314 and Zen (Summit Ridge) for the Ryzen 5 1400. Process nodes differ at 12 nm versus 14 nm. Transistor counts are 4,940 million for the R2314 and 4,800 million for the Ryzen 5 1400. Die sizes are 210 mm² and 213 mm² respectively.

L3 cache is halved on the embedded part: 4 MB shared for the R2314 versus 8 MB shared for the Ryzen 5 1400. The R2314 includes integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics, while the Ryzen 5 1400 has no integrated graphics. The multiplier is locked on the R2314 but unlocked on the Ryzen 5 1400. Release dates are June 2022 for the R2314 and April 2017 for the Ryzen 5 1400. The Ryzen 5 1400 has a launch MSRP of $169; the R2314 has no listed launch MSRP. Part numbers also differ: YE2314C4T4MFH for the R2314 and YD1400BBM4KAEYD1400BBAEBOX for the Ryzen 5 1400.

Shared specifications include four cores, 96 KB L1 cache per core, 512 KB L2 cache per core, DDR4 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, 42.7 GB/s memory bandwidth, ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and active production status.

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture of two processors built for different purposes. The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 is the superior choice for single-threaded workloads and legacy applications. Its 48.4% advantage in Cinebench R15 single-core and 17.1% lead in R23 single-core make it the stronger performer for everyday tasks, older software, and lightly threaded applications. The eight threads and 8 MB of L3 cache also give it a solid foundation for multi-tasking, as evidenced by its 28.3% win in Cinebench R15 multi-core.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314, despite its severe single-core deficit, delivers a compelling modern multi-core result. Its 22.8% victory in Cinebench R23 multi-core — achieved with a 15 W TDP, no SMT, and half the L3 cache — signals that the Zen+ architecture is significantly more efficient than the original Zen design. This makes the R2314 the logical choice for power-constrained embedded systems, fanless designs, or applications that prioritize the latest benchmark standards over legacy compatibility.

Purchase decisions should be driven by platform requirements. If the application requires Socket AM4, an unlocked multiplier, or integrated graphics, the choice is predetermined. Otherwise, the Ryzen 5 1400 offers better overall benchmark consistency across both R15 and R23, while the R2314 offers a single but significant modern multi-core win. The near-identical average scores — 1415 versus 1410 — suggest that neither chip dominates the other comprehensively. The Ryzen 5 1400 is the safer bet for general desktop use; the R2314 is the specialist for low-power embedded deployments where its R23 multi-core performance and integrated Vega graphics outweigh its single-core shortcomings.