AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 5 130 versus the Intel Core i5-14401E. Instead, the comparison relies on the Intel part’s recorded Cinebench scores and the AMD part’s lack of any benchmark entries. From the available data, the Intel Core i5-14401E is the only processor with measurable performance results, and it shows a clear profile across both multi-core and single-core workloads.

In Cinebench R15, the Intel Core i5-14401E records a multi-core score of 1830 and a single-core score of 258. The gap between these figures indicates strong scaling from one core to six cores, though the single-core result is modest relative to the multi-core figure. In Cinebench R20, the same processor delivers a multi-core score of 7627 and a single-core score of 1076. The multi-core result here is roughly four times the single-core score, which is expected for a 6-core, 12-thread part with a 4.70 GHz boost clock.

Cinebench R23 results continue the pattern: the Intel Core i5-14401E reaches 18161 in multi-core and 2564 in single-core. The multi-core score is approximately seven times the single-core score, which is consistent with efficient thread utilization across all six cores. The single-core scores across R15, R20, and R23 show a steady progression, reflecting the processor’s ability to maintain high clock speeds on lightly threaded workloads.

Because the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no benchmark entries in the database, there are no wins to assign for either side in a head-to-head comparison. The wins tally shows 0 for AMD and 0 for Intel, meaning the database does not record any direct competitive benchmark outcomes. The Intel part’s average benchmark score of 5253 places it at the 60th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD part’s percentile is 50 with an average score of 0.

Relative to its nearest rivals in the database, the Intel Core i5-14401E sits within a narrow band. The Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 posts an average score of 5259, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14401E. The Intel Core i7-11700B averages 5241, 0.2% lower, and the Intel Core i9-10850K averages 5240, also 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-13400T averages 5210, 0.8% lower. These deltas show that the i5-14401E performs essentially on par with a broad set of older high-end desktop and mobile processors, with none of the rivals exceeding it by more than a tenth of a percent.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded data, the Intel Core i5-14401E holds all measurable performance advantages because it is the only chip with benchmark scores. In multi-core workloads, its Cinebench R23 result of 18161 indicates strong sustained throughput for tasks that use all six cores and twelve threads. The R20 multi-core score of 7627 and the R15 multi-core score of 1830 reinforce this pattern, showing consistent scaling across different renderer versions.

For single-core tasks, the Intel part’s boost clock of 4.70 GHz supports its single-core scores of 258 in R15, 1076 in R20, and 2564 in R23. These figures suggest that lightly threaded applications such as legacy software, some simulation tools, or per-core licensing scenarios would benefit from the higher clock speed. The Intel chip also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which broadens its compatibility with existing platforms, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature relevant to workstation or server-like use.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no benchmark scores in the database, so no performance wins can be attributed to it from the recorded measurements. Its specifications, however, indicate a different usage profile: a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.55 GHz, built on a 6 nm process. It is classified as a mobile segment part with a 28 watt TDP, which points toward power-constrained environments rather than desktop performance. Its integrated Radeon 660M graphics and DDR5 memory support suggest it targets thin-and-light laptops or compact systems where power efficiency and integrated graphics matter more than raw multi-core throughput.

The Intel part’s 65 watt TDP and desktop socket (LGA 1700) position it for conventional desktop builds with adequate cooling. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes offers a modern interface for high-speed storage and graphics, though the AMD part’s PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes provides more total lanes at a slightly older standard. The Intel chip’s larger L3 cache of 20 MB shared, compared to the AMD’s 16 MB shared, may help in cache-sensitive workloads, though no direct benchmark data confirms this.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different process nodes and foundries. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14401E uses a 10 nm process from Intel’s own fabs. The smaller process node for AMD typically allows for lower power draw, which aligns with its 28 watt TDP versus Intel’s 65 watt TDP. The AMD die size is 210 mm², while the Intel die is 215 mm², a minor difference despite the node advantage.

Architecture-wise, the AMD part is based on Zen 3+ under the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the Ryzen 5 generation. The Intel part uses Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series (Raptor Lake Refresh). Both are 6-core, 12-thread designs, so thread counts match, but the underlying microarchitectures differ significantly in terms of instruction handling and cache hierarchy.

Cache configurations differ notably. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip therefore provides more L2 and L3 cache per core, which can reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data. The AMD part’s smaller caches are offset by its higher memory bandwidth rating of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Memory support also separates the two. The AMD processor supports only DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel. This gives the Intel part more flexibility for system builders who may already own DDR4 modules. Both support ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer parts and relevant for error-sensitive computing. The AMD part’s PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Gen 5 offers double the per-lane bandwidth, but the AMD part provides more total lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 includes a Radeon 660M, which is a more capable iGPU for gaming or media tasks than the Intel UHD Graphics 730 found in the Core i5-14401E. The AMD part’s mobile market segment and socket (FP7) indicate it is intended for laptops or portable devices, whereas the Intel part’s desktop segment and LGA 1700 socket target stationary systems. The AMD chip’s release date is later (September 2025) than the Intel chip’s (June 2024), though both are listed as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 130’s boost clock of 4.55 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 130 and the Intel Core i5-14401E support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Q: Is there any benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 5 130?

A: No, the database records no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 5 130. All recorded Cinebench scores belong to the Intel Core i5-14401E.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core i5-14401E is the only processor with measurable performance, and its scores place it at the 60th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen 5 130, with no benchmark entries and a 50th percentile standing (based on an average score of 0), cannot be compared on performance grounds from the available measurements.

For users who need verified multi-core and single-core performance, the Intel Core i5-14401E delivers consistent results across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, with an average benchmark score of 5253 that is statistically tied to its nearest rivals. The Intel chip also offers more L2 and L3 cache per core, dual memory support (DDR4 and DDR5), and a higher boost clock, which are concrete specification advantages.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130, however, holds advantages in power efficiency, with a 28 watt TDP versus 65 watts, and a smaller 6 nm process node versus 10 nm. Its Radeon 660M integrated graphics are likely more capable for graphics tasks than Intel’s UHD Graphics 730, and its 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes exceed Intel’s 16 Gen 5 lanes in total count. The AMD part’s mobile socket and market segment indicate a design for laptops, where power draw and integrated graphics matter more than raw compute.

The database’s lack of AMD benchmark scores means no performance-based recommendation can be made for the Ryzen 5 130. For desktop users seeking validated compute throughput, the Intel Core i5-14401E is the only option with recorded evidence. For mobile or power-sensitive systems, the AMD Ryzen 5 130’s specifications suggest a suitable fit, but its performance remains unquantified in the database.