AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 130 and Intel Core 7 350 are two mobile processors aimed at different priorities within the same performance envelope. The Ryzen 5 130 is a 6-core, 12-thread part built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with Zen 3+ architecture, while the Core 7 350 is a 6-core, 6-thread chip on Intel’s 3 nm node using the Wildcat Lake design. The recorded benchmark data only includes scores for the Intel Core 7 350, so the comparison relies on architectural characteristics and the available measurements for the Intel part.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 350 holds the advantage in every recorded benchmark, as it is the only processor in the database with test scores. Its percentile rank of 71 places it above the median, and its average benchmark score of 17779 confirms strong all-around performance. The Core 7 350 delivers a multi-threaded score of 8030 in Cinebench R23, a single-core score of 2046 in the same test, and a Passmark multithread score of 15170. These numbers indicate a capable mobile processor for both productivity and content creation workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot be directly scored. However, its specifications suggest where it would likely compete. The Ryzen part has simultaneous multithreading (12 threads versus 6), a higher base clock of 2.90 GHz versus 1.50 GHz, and a larger shared L3 cache of 16 MB versus 6 MB. These features typically benefit heavily threaded workloads such as video encoding, compilation, and scientific computing. The Intel part counters with a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus 4.55 GHz, larger per-core L1 and L2 caches (192 KB and 2.5 MB versus 64 KB and 512 KB), and a smaller 3 nm process that improves efficiency. In single-threaded tasks and bursty workloads, the Core 7 350’s higher boost and cache per core give it the edge.

The data shows the Core 7 350 wins outright on measured performance. The Ryzen 5 130’s architectural strengths, particularly its 12 threads and larger L3, would likely make it the better choice for parallel workloads if it had benchmark scores, but no numbers exist to confirm this. The Intel part also offers a higher memory bandwidth ceiling with up to 59.7 GB/s on a single-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X bus, although the Ryzen’s dual-channel design supports 76.8 GB/s, which could favor the AMD part in memory-intensive tasks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in design philosophy. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 210 mm². It integrates a Radeon 660M GPU and supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The Intel Core 7 350 uses a 3 nm Intel process with the Wildcat Lake codename, integrates Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, and supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, but only over a single-channel bus.

Cache layouts differ markedly. The Ryzen 5 130 allocates 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 16 MB L3. The Core 7 350 provides 192 KB of L1 and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel part’s larger per-core caches reduce memory latency for single-threaded code, while the AMD part’s larger L3 pool helps keep all 12 threads fed. The Ryzen also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Intel chip.

PCIe connectivity differs: the Ryzen 5 130 offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with only 6 lanes. This makes the AMD part more suitable for systems with multiple NVMe drives or discrete GPUs. The Intel chip’s lower TDP of 15 watts versus 28 watts suggests it is designed for thinner, fanless or low-power notebooks, whereas the Ryzen’s higher power budget allows for sustained multi-threaded performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 12 threads from 6 cores, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 threads from 6 cores.

Q: What is the highest boost clock recorded in the database?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 boosts to 4.80 GHz, compared to 4.55 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 130.

Q: Does the AMD processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 130 includes ECC memory support. The Intel Core 7 350 does not.

Q: Which chip has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports 76.8 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 bus. The Intel Core 7 350 supports 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X bus.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 is built on TSMC’s 6 nm process. The Intel Core 7 350 is built on Intel’s 3 nm process.

Q: How does the Intel part perform in Cinebench R23?

A: The Core 7 350 scores 8030 in multi-core and 2046 in single-core in Cinebench R23.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 130 | Intel Core 7 350 |

|---------------|-----------------|------------------|

| Threads | 12 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.55 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Process Node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 3 nm (Intel) |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Support | Yes | No |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 4, 20 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Intel Xe3 (2 Xe) |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Launch MSRP | None | $469 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark data exists between the two processors, as the database contains no scores for the AMD Ryzen 5 130. All measured benchmarks belong to the Intel Core 7 350, which provides a baseline for its performance. In Cinebench R15, the Core 7 350 scores 1220 in multi-core and 292 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5373 multi-core and 758 single-core. Cinebench R23 results show 8030 multi-core and 2046 single-core.

The Passmark suite offers additional insight. The Core 7 350 records 143123 in data compression, 10933 in data encryption, 12045 in extended instructions, 107 in find prime numbers, 42809 in floating point math, 33734 in integer math, 15170 in multithread, 1173 in physics, 17238 in random string sorting, and 4100 in single-thread tests. These figures place the Intel chip at the 71st percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average score of 17779.

The nearest rivals to the Core 7 350, based on average score, include the Intel Core 5 221TE at 17860 (0.5% higher), the AMD EPYC 9374F at 17693 (0.5% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT at 17891 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core 5 120U at 17898 (0.7% higher). These deltas are all within one percent, indicating that the Core 7 350 sits in a tightly competitive performance band. The Ryzen 5 130 has no such rival data, so its standing cannot be compared directly.

The Intel part’s single-thread performance is particularly strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2046 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4100. This suggests excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications, likely aided by the 4.80 GHz boost and large per-core caches. The multi-thread score of 8030 in Cinebench R23 is respectable for a 6-core, 6-thread part, though the lack of SMT limits its scaling compared to the Ryzen 5 130’s 12 threads.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130, without benchmark scores, presents a specification-based case. Its dual-channel memory bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth exceed the Intel chip’s single-channel 59.7 GB/s, which could improve performance in memory-bound workloads. The 16 MB L3 cache and 12 threads would likely yield higher multi-threaded scores in Cinebench and Passmark multithread tests, but the absence of data prevents any quantitative claim. The Intel Core 7 350 remains the only processor with verified measurements, and its 71st percentile ranking confirms it as a solid mid-range mobile option.