AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 251TE holds a decisive advantage across every recorded benchmark in the database, with the AMD Ryzen 5 130 showing no wins in any measured discipline. The most dramatic separation appears in multi-core rendering workloads, where the Intel part's 24 cores and 32 threads produce a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,518 points. The AMD processor, with 6 cores and 12 threads, does not have a comparable Cinebench result recorded, but its overall benchmark profile places it at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel chip sits at the 88th percentile.

In single-threaded performance, the Intel Core 7 251TE delivers a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,602 points and a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1,512 points. Its PassMark single-thread result is 3,568, which matches the PassMark singlethread result of 3,568 exactly, confirming consistency across the two database entries. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning all head-to-head comparisons rely on the Intel part's absolute numbers and its rival positioning.

The Intel processor's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance tier. The Core Ultra 7 265H averages 41,621 points, a 0.1% delta above the Core 7 251TE, while the Core i7-14650HX averages 41,576 points, a 0.2% delta above. The Core i7-12850HX sits 0.3% below at 41,779 points, and the Core i7-14700T trails by 0.6% with 41,914 points. These tight deltas indicate the Core 7 251TE performs within a narrow band of other high-end Intel parts, despite its own average benchmark score of 41,650.

PassMark results for the Intel chip show substantial throughput in compute-heavy tasks: multi-thread performance reaches 30,022 points, integer math hits 125,739, floating-point math reaches 85,607, and extended instructions score 16,974. Data compression achieves 334,399, while data encryption reaches 22,176. Random string sorting produces 39,643, and find prime numbers yields a modest 140. Physics performance comes in at 1,938. These figures indicate the Intel part is optimized for parallel workloads that scale with core count.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130's absence from the benchmark database means its exact scores cannot be compared numerically. However, its 50th percentile ranking versus the Intel chip's 88th percentile suggests a substantial performance gap in aggregate terms, with the Intel processor likely dominating in both multi-threaded and single-threaded scenarios based on the available data.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 7 251TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process fabricated by Intel. The die sizes are close: AMD measures 210 mm², while Intel measures 215 mm², a difference of only 5 mm² despite the contrasting core counts.

Core configuration creates the largest architectural split. AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel provides 24 cores and 32 threads. This 4x core advantage and roughly 2.7x thread advantage for Intel explains its multi-core dominance. Clock speeds tell a different story: the AMD chip has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.55 GHz, whereas the Intel chip starts at 1.40 GHz base but boosts to 5.40 GHz. The Intel part's higher boost ceiling gives it an edge in bursty single-thread workloads, while its lower base clock suggests it relies on boosting under load.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel L3 cache is more than double the AMD capacity, which benefits workloads with large working sets and frequent data sharing across cores.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only with dual-channel access and 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. Intel's broader memory compatibility and 12.8 GB/s higher bandwidth gives it more flexibility for system builders. Both processors support ECC memory, a feature that appeals to workstation and server-adjacent use cases.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. AMD offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while Intel offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Intel's newer PCIe generation provides higher per-lane bandwidth, though AMD provides more total lanes. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon 660M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Both are capable of basic display output, though their performance characteristics are not recorded in the database.

Socket and market positioning separate the two further. AMD uses Socket FP7, a mobile-oriented socket, and targets the mobile segment. Intel uses Socket 1700, a desktop socket, and targets the desktop segment. This explains the TDP difference: AMD draws 28 watts, while Intel draws 45 watts. The lower TDP of the AMD chip suggests it is designed for thermally constrained mobile chassis, while the Intel chip's higher TDP accommodates desktop cooling solutions.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 251TE wins in every scenario where parallel throughput matters. Its 24 cores and 32 threads drive multi-core rendering, video encoding, compilation, and scientific computing workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,518 points and PassMark multi-thread score of 30,022 points indicate strong scaling across many threads. Data compression at 334,399 and integer math at 125,739 reinforce this pattern: these workloads benefit directly from core count.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130's advantages are not visible in benchmark scores, since none are recorded, but its architecture suggests specific strengths. The 6 nm TSMC process, compared to Intel's 10 nm process, likely yields better power efficiency per operation. Its 28-watt TDP, versus Intel's 45 watts, positions it for fanless or low-noise designs in ultraportable laptops. The higher 2.90 GHz base clock, compared to Intel's 1.40 GHz, means the AMD chip maintains higher sustained frequencies under moderate loads without relying on boost behavior.

Single-thread performance is a mixed picture. Intel's 5.40 GHz boost clock and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,602 points suggest it wins in short, bursty tasks like web browsing, document editing, and light scripting. However, AMD's higher base clock of 2.90 GHz could provide more consistent performance in sustained single-thread workloads where boost clocks cannot be maintained indefinitely. The database does not include AMD single-thread scores, so this remains an inference from clock specifications rather than measured results.

Power-constrained environments favor the AMD chip. Its 28-watt TDP is 17 watts lower than Intel's 45-watt figure, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where thermal limits are strict. The Intel chip's higher TDP requires more robust cooling, but its desktop socket allows for larger heatsinks and better airflow. For battery-powered devices, the AMD processor's efficiency profile likely extends runtime, though the database does not record battery life or power draw under load.

Memory flexibility favors Intel. Support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives system builders the option to use cheaper DDR4 memory or faster DDR5, while AMD is locked into DDR5 only. The Intel chip's 89.6 GB/s bandwidth also exceeds AMD's 76.8 GB/s, which can benefit memory-bound applications. ECC support on both processors means neither sacrifices data integrity features, but Intel's higher bandwidth gives it a measurable advantage in memory-intensive tasks.

Specification Differences

The processors differ across nearly every specification category in the database.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 130 | Intel Core 7 251TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 24 |

| Threads | 12 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 1.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.55 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 36 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2025-01-12 |

| Part Number | 100-000000992(FP7r2) | SRQAXQ5ZG |

| Percentile | 50 | 88 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 41,650 |

The Intel part's launch MSRP is $384. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports user overclocking. The Intel chip's release date precedes the AMD chip by roughly eight months, giving it a longer market presence.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the highest boost clock between the two?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE boosts to 5.40 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 130's 4.55 GHz boost clock.

Q: Does the Intel processor support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 7 251TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports DDR5 only.

Q: What is the benchmark percentile ranking for each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 ranks at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core 7 251TE ranks at the 88th percentile.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has a 28-watt TDP, which is 17 watts lower than the Intel Core 7 251TE's 45-watt TDP.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the Intel Core 7 251TE in the database?

A: The nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (0.1% above), Intel Core i7-14650HX (0.2% above), Intel Core i7-12850HX (0.3% below), and Intel Core i7-14700T (0.6% below).