AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 130
Core 5 211TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core 5 211TE
FAQ
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211TE uses 10 cores and 16 threads.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 130's 4.55 GHz boost clock.
Q: What memory types does each processor support?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 5 211TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, the database records ECC memory support as enabled for both the AMD Ryzen 5 130 and the Intel Core 5 211TE.
Q: What is the process node for each chip?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 211TE uses a 10 nm process at Intel.
Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?
A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has an average benchmark score of 15370, while the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 5 211TE is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark data, so it dominates all measured categories. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no benchmark entries, meaning the data cannot show any wins for it. The Intel part's 10 cores and 16 threads provide a structural advantage in multi-threaded workloads, and its 4.80 GHz boost clock gives it a strong single-thread ceiling.
The Intel Core 5 211TE holds a 69th percentile position among all CPUs, placing it ahead of 68% of the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7543 at a 0.7% higher score, the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U at 2% higher, the AMD EPYC 7702P at 1.6% lower, and the Intel Core i3-1315U at 2.3% lower. These tight margins indicate the Core 5 211TE sits in a competitive performance band where small differences separate it from server and mobile parts alike.
The AMD Ryzen 5 130, by contrast, has a 50th percentile ranking and no measured scores. Its 28 W TDP and mobile market segment suggest it targets power-sensitive applications, but the database contains no verification of its performance. The Intel Core 5 211TE, with a 45 W TDP and desktop market segment, is positioned for sustained workloads where higher power draw is acceptable.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip's die size is 210 mm², while the Intel chip's die is 215 mm², a small difference of 5 mm².
Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD part provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has both a larger per-core L2 cache and a larger shared L3 pool, which can benefit workloads that reuse data across cores.
The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses the AMD Socket FP7 and the Radeon 660M integrated graphics. The Intel Core 5 211TE uses Intel Socket 1700 and UHD Graphics 730. Both support dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and both list ECC support as enabled.
PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. This means the Intel part has a newer PCIe standard but fewer lanes, while the AMD part has more lanes at an older standard.
The AMD part's memory support is limited to DDR5, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. This gives the Intel chip more flexibility in system builds, particularly for platforms that still use DDR4 memory.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across nearly every physical and electrical specification. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, a difference of 4 cores and 4 threads.
Base clocks are markedly different: the AMD chip runs at 2.90 GHz, while the Intel chip runs at 1.70 GHz. Boost clocks reverse the order, with the AMD part reaching 4.55 GHz and the Intel part reaching 4.80 GHz. The Intel chip has a wider clock range between base and boost.
TDP values show a 17 W gap: the AMD part is rated at 28 W, the Intel part at 45 W. Socket compatibility is entirely different, with the AMD chip on Socket FP7 and the Intel chip on Socket 1700.
Process nodes differ by 4 nm, with the AMD part on 6 nm and the Intel part on 10 nm. The AMD chip is fabricated by TSMC, while the Intel chip is fabricated by Intel. Die sizes are nearly identical at 210 mm² versus 215 mm².
Cache specifications show the Intel chip with larger per-core L1 and L2 caches and a larger L3. Memory support favors the Intel chip with both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD chip supports only DDR5. PCIe favors the Intel chip with Gen 5, though the AMD chip has more lanes.
The Intel Core 5 211TE has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
Since the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded benchmarks, all head-to-head comparisons rely on the Intel Core 5 211TE's measured scores. The database shows no wins for the AMD part and no head-to-head benchmark entries between the two processors.
The Intel Core 5 211TE's Cinebench results provide a clear performance profile. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1229 in multicore and 173 in singlecore. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5124 in multicore and 723 in singlecore. In Cinebench R23, it scores 12201 in multicore and 1722 in singlecore. These results show a multicore score roughly seven times larger than the singlecore score in each Cinebench version, which is consistent with its 16-thread configuration.
PassMark results further detail the Intel part's capabilities. The multithread score is 11685, while the single-thread score is 1408. Integer math scores 33991, floating-point math scores 26150, and extended instructions score 8615. Data compression reaches 133434, data encryption reaches 7231, and random string sorting reaches 14838. Physics scores 1278, and finding prime numbers scores 72.
The Intel Core 5 211TE's average benchmark score of 15370 places it near several competitors. The AMD EPYC 7543 scores 15477, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD EPYC 7702P scores 15130, which is 1.6% lower. The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U scores 15682, which is 2% higher. The Intel Core i3-1315U scores 15022, which is 2.3% lower. These deltas show the Core 5 211TE performing within a narrow 4.6% band across its nearest rivals.
The absence of AMD Ryzen 5 130 benchmark data means the database cannot confirm any performance advantage for that chip. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on specification-level comparison, not measured workloads. The Intel Core 5 211TE's 69th percentile ranking is backed by 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.
The Intel part's strongest relative results appear in data compression, where the score of 133434 is more than 11 times its integer math score, and in floating-point math, where 26150 exceeds the integer score of 33991 by a smaller margin. The physics score of 1278 is the lowest among the PassMark tests, while prime number finding at 72 is the smallest absolute value but reflects a highly specific computation.
The Core 5 211TE's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12201 is roughly 7.1 times its singlecore score of 1722. By comparison, its Cinebench R20 multicore score of 5124 is about 7.1 times its singlecore score of 723, and its R15 multicore score of 1229 is about 7.1 times its singlecore score of 173. This consistent ratio indicates linear scaling across 16 threads in these rendering workloads.
The Intel part's nearest rival comparisons show it slightly underperforming the AMD EPYC 7543 and AMD Ryzen 3 7440U, while slightly outperforming the AMD EPYC 7702P and Intel Core i3-1315U. The margins are all within 2.3%, suggesting that the Core 5 211TE delivers performance comparable to both server-class EPYC parts and a modern Ryzen mobile chip.