AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the AMD Ryzen 5 130 and the Intel Core 3 201E?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 is built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 3 201E is built on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Q: What type of memory does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core 3 201E supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 130's boost clock of 4.55 GHz.

Q: What is the market segment for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 is a Mobile processor using AMD Socket FP7. The Intel Core 3 201E is a Desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 130 and Intel Core 3 201E target different usage scenarios, and the benchmark data from the database reflects distinct strengths for each. The AMD chip, with its 6-core, 12-thread design and Radeon 660M integrated graphics, appears oriented toward mobile productivity where multi-threaded workloads and power efficiency matter. The Intel chip, a desktop part with 4 cores and 8 threads, leverages higher clock speeds and a larger per-core cache allocation to excel in single-threaded and latency-sensitive tasks.

For users running heavily parallel workloads such as rendering, video encoding, or scientific simulations, the Ryzen 5 130's additional two cores and four threads provide a structural advantage. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache on the AMD chip also helps when working with datasets that fit within that pool. However, the database does not include direct benchmark scores for the Ryzen 5 130, so its exact performance numbers are not recorded; the analysis here relies on the architectural specifications and the Intel chip's measured results.

The Intel Core 3 201E wins in scenarios where single-core performance and high clock speeds are paramount. Its boost clock of 4.80 GHz is notably higher than the Ryzen's 4.55 GHz, and its L2 cache is substantially larger at 1.25 MB per core compared to 512 KB per core on the AMD part. This makes the Intel chip well-suited for everyday desktop tasks, legacy software, and applications that do not scale well beyond a few threads. Its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory also gives it flexibility in system building, allowing users to pair it with either memory generation.

In terms of raw measured output, the Intel Core 3 201E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12613 and a single-core score of 1780. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3482, while its multi-thread score is 14839. The Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its wins are defined by specification advantages rather than measured results. The Intel chip also holds a higher percentile ranking at 73 versus the Ryzen's 50, indicating it outperforms a larger share of all CPUs in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The AMD chip represents a refined version of AMD's mobile-focused architecture, while the Intel chip is a desktop-oriented design with a simpler core configuration.

Cache architecture differs significantly between the two. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with a shared 16 MB L3 pool. The Intel Core 3 201E allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and a much larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core, but its shared L3 is smaller at 12 MB. This means the Intel chip favors per-core data locality and faster access to frequently used data, while the AMD chip offers a larger shared pool for multi-core workloads.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 includes the Radeon 660M, which is a more capable GPU solution for mobile use. The Intel Core 3 201E includes UHD Graphics 730, a more modest integrated solution typical of desktop parts. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not officially supported on either platform.

The memory controllers reflect their respective markets. The AMD chip supports only DDR5 with dual-channel operation and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel with the same 76.8 GB/s bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for workstation and server-adjacent workloads. PCIe support differs as well: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, giving the Intel part newer interconnect technology but fewer total lanes.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks diverge sharply: the AMD chip runs at 2.90 GHz, while the Intel chip runs at 3.60 GHz. Boost clocks also favor Intel, with 4.80 GHz versus 4.55 GHz on the AMD.

Power consumption is a major differentiator. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has a TDP of 28 watts, making it a low-power mobile part. The Intel Core 3 201E has a TDP of 60 watts, more than double, reflecting its desktop orientation and higher clock speeds. This power gap is consistent with their market segments: the AMD chip is designed for laptops and other power-constrained devices, while the Intel chip is meant for desktop systems with more robust cooling.

Process node and die size also differ. The AMD chip uses a 6 nm process with a die size of 210 mm². The Intel chip uses a 10 nm process with a smaller die size of 163 mm². Despite the larger process node, the Intel die is physically smaller, which may reflect a simpler core layout without the additional two cores of the AMD part.

Socket and platform compatibility are entirely different. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel Core 3 201E uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is marked as Mobile, while the Intel part is marked as Desktop. Release dates are also staggered: the Intel Core 3 201E launched on 2025-01-12, while the AMD Ryzen 5 130 launched later on 2025-09-30. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $134, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 5 130 and the Intel Core 3 201E. The AMD chip has zero recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel chip has a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible, but the Intel chip's measured performance can be evaluated against its nearest rivals in the database.

The Intel Core 3 201E achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12613 and a single-core score of 1780. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5297 multi-core and 747 single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 1271 multi-core and 179 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that is capable in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks, with the single-core performance being particularly strong given the 4.80 GHz boost clock.

PassMark results for the Intel chip show a multi-thread score of 14839 and a single-thread score of 3482. The data compression test scores 164160, while data encryption scores 8931. Floating point math scores 33260, and integer math scores 43894. Extended instructions score 11035, and random string sorting scores 17783. Find prime numbers scores 57, and physics scores 1141.

The Intel Core 3 201E holds a 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19056. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an average score of 19047 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core i5-12400F with an average score of 19039 and a delta of 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i5-1335U with an average score of 18982 and a delta of 0.4 percent, and the AMD EPYC 7773X with an average score of 18979 and a delta of 0.4 percent. These deltas show the Intel Core 3 201E is essentially tied with its closest competitors, edging them out by fractions of a percent.

For the AMD Ryzen 5 130, the absence of benchmark scores means its competitive position is defined entirely by specifications. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 28-watt TDP suggests strong multi-threaded efficiency for a mobile part, and the Radeon 660M integrated graphics provide a more robust GPU solution than the Intel chip's UHD Graphics 730. However, the Intel chip's measured results and higher percentile ranking indicate it is the more performant processor on paper for desktop workloads, particularly in single-threaded applications where its higher clocks and larger L2 cache provide clear advantages.