AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and the Intel Core i9-14901TE?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14901TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G boosts to 4.90 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and the Intel Core i9-14901TE support ECC memory.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses Radeon 740M graphics. The Intel Core i9-14901TE uses UHD Graphics 770.

The Verdict

The database contains benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G, but the Intel Core i9-14901TE has an empty benchmark record. The Intel chip holds an average benchmark score of zero and no recorded test results, meaning no head-to-head comparison can be drawn from measured data. The AMD processor, by contrast, shows a full bench suite with an average score of 17278 and a percentile rank of 71 against all CPUs. The Intel Core i9-14901TE sits at the 50th percentile, though this figure is not supported by any specific test entries in the database.

For users selecting strictly from recorded measurements, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the only option with verified performance data. The Intel part offers a higher core count, a higher boost clock, and a larger L3 cache on paper, but those specifications are not validated by any benchmark results in the database. The data cannot support a claim that the Intel chip outperforms the AMD chip, nor can it confirm the reverse. Any decision based on the recorded numbers must favor the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G, as it is the sole processor with measurable scores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark entries exist for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G versus the Intel Core i9-14901TE. The head-to-head section in the database is empty, and the win counts for both processors are zero. The AMD chip does have a full set of individual test scores, but there are no corresponding Intel scores to compare against.

Looking at the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G alone, the recorded data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12359 and a single-core score of 1744. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 5190 and the single-core score is 732. Passmark results include a multithread score of 13368, a single-thread score of 3550, and an integer math score of 37292. The floating point math score is 23374, and the extended instructions score is 11451. Data compression scores 150567, data encryption scores 8607, and random string sorting scores 19703. Find prime numbers scores 47, and physics scores 772.

These numbers give a complete profile for the AMD part, but with no Intel benchmark entries, the comparison cannot proceed. The database records no direct match, no delta percentages, and no rival scores for the Intel chip. The only comparative context available for the AMD processor comes from its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17239 on average, which is 0.2% behind the AMD chip; the AMD Ryzen 3 210 scores 17321, which is 0.2% ahead; the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 scores 17333, which is 0.3% ahead; and the Intel Core i5-11400F scores 17177, which is 0.6% behind.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE uses 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock also differs: the AMD chip runs at 3.40 GHz, the Intel chip at 2.30 GHz. The boost clock favors Intel at 5.50 GHz versus 4.90 GHz for AMD.

TDP is another clear divergence. The AMD part is rated at 65 watts, the Intel part at 45 watts. The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses Socket AM5, Intel uses Socket 1700. The process nodes differ as well, with TSMC producing the AMD chip at 4 nm and Intel producing its own chip at 10 nm.

Cache configurations are not the same. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. The die size for AMD is 137 mm², while Intel's die measures 257 mm². Transistor counts are only recorded for AMD at 20,900 million; the Intel transistor count is not listed.

Memory support differs. The AMD chip supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. PCIe support favors Intel with Gen 5 and 16 CPU lanes, while AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: Radeon 740M on the AMD side, UHD Graphics 770 on the Intel side.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is built on Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix2. It belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation within the 8000 series. The Intel Core i9-14901TE is built on Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, belonging to the Core i9 generation within Core 14th Gen. The AMD chip is a 4 nm TSMC design; the Intel chip is a 10 nm Intel design.

The core counts reflect different design goals. AMD uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while Intel uses 8 cores and 16 threads. The cache hierarchy is larger on the Intel side for L2 and L3, though the L1 per-core figure is also higher on Intel. The AMD chip has 8 MB of shared L3, while the Intel chip has 36 MB of shared L3. Die size is nearly double on Intel at 257 mm² versus 137 mm² for AMD, which correlates with the larger core count and cache.

Both processors support ECC memory, which is a notable feature for reliability-focused builds. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD chip is coded Phoenix2 and the Intel chip is coded Raptor Lake-R. The production status for both is Active. The release dates differ: the AMD chip was released on 2024-04-15, and the Intel chip on 2024-06-30.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins in the only category where measured data exists, which is recorded benchmark performance. Its average benchmark score is 17278, and it holds a 71st percentile rank among all CPUs. The chip shows strong single-thread performance with a Passmark single-thread score of 3550 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1744. Its multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 12359 indicates a capable 4-core part that still handles threaded workloads well relative to its class.

The AMD chip also wins on process node efficiency, using a 4 nm TSMC process compared to Intel's 10 nm process. It has a higher base clock at 3.40 GHz versus 2.30 GHz, though the Intel chip boosts higher. The AMD chip has a smaller die at 137 mm² versus 257 mm², and it supports DDR5 memory with a recorded bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE wins on raw specification counts. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, double the thread count of the AMD part. Its boost clock of 5.50 GHz is higher than the AMD chip's 4.90 GHz. The L3 cache is 36 MB versus 8 MB, and the L2 cache is 2 MB per core versus 1 MB per core. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving it broader memory compatibility. It also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a generation ahead of AMD's Gen 4 with 14 lanes. The TDP is lower at 45 watts versus 65 watts, which could favor thermally constrained systems if the performance were measured.

The Intel chip has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database cannot confirm any performance win for it. The AMD chip, with its full benchmark suite, is the only processor in this comparison with verified performance data. Users needing measured results must rely on the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G; users prioritizing core count, cache size, memory flexibility, and PCIe generation on paper may look to the Intel Core i9-14901TE, but the absence of benchmark data leaves that choice unsupported by measurements.