AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Intel Core i5-11400F Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and Intel Core i5-11400F present a fascinating generational clash, separated by three years of silicon evolution but landing within 0.6% of each other in average benchmark score (17278 vs 17177). The head-to-head data reveals a stark split: Intel wins 15 of 17 benchmark comparisons, yet AMD captures the single-threaded crown by a decisive margin. This is not a simple "newer is better" story — the 8300G’s Zen 4 architecture delivers a single-core advantage that the older Rocket Lake design cannot match, while the i5-11400F’s two extra physical cores power it to victory in nearly every multi-threaded workload. The data suggests these processors target different priorities despite their similar overall standing.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-11400F dominates the multi-core arena with consistent double-digit margins. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5 scores 14340 against the Ryzen’s 12359, a 13.8% advantage. The pattern repeats across every Cinebench iteration: R15 multi-core shows 1445 vs 1245 (-13.8%), R20 multi-core shows 6022 vs 5190 (-13.8%), and R23 single-core shows 2024 vs 1744 (-13.8%). The consistency of that exact delta across all Cinebench tests is striking — it suggests a fixed structural advantage rather than workload-specific behavior.

PassMark results amplify Intel’s lead in computational throughput. The largest gap appears in integer math, where Intel scores 57624 against AMD’s 37292 — a 35.3% deficit for the Ryzen. Floating-point math tells a similar story: 34127 vs 23374, a 31.5% gap. Data compression shows Intel ahead by 27.8% (208472 vs 150567), while extended instructions favor Intel by 23.5% (14976 vs 11451). Even the closer PassMark tests tilt Intel’s way: multithread at 16908 vs 13368 (-20.9%), random string sorting at 24124 vs 19703 (-18.3%), and data encryption at 10247 vs 8607 (-16%).

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G’s lone victories come in PassMark single-thread tests, where it scores 3550 against Intel’s 2981 — a 19.1% advantage. This is a substantial win, not a marginal one. The Ryzen’s single-thread performance is nearly a fifth faster, which matters for lightly-threaded applications. However, the head-to-head tally is lopsided: Intel wins 15 tests, AMD wins 2. The average benchmark scores remain close (17278 vs 17177) because the two PassMark single-thread results are counted separately, but the overall pattern is clear — Intel wins the majority of workloads, often by wide margins.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental divergence begins with process node. AMD builds the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G on TSMC’s 4 nm process, while Intel uses its own 14 nm node for Rocket Lake. This process gap explains much of the power efficiency and clock behavior. The AMD chip measures 137 mm² with 20,900 million transistors, while Intel’s die is larger at 276 mm² with no transistor count provided. Despite the smaller die, AMD fits a more modern design — Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix2 codename, versus Intel’s older Rocket Lake architecture.

Core configuration differs significantly. The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core i5-11400F offers 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel’s two extra physical cores are the primary driver of its multi-threaded wins. Cache layouts also diverge: AMD provides 64 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core, with 8 MB shared L3. Intel offers 80 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The larger L3 on Intel (12 MB vs 8 MB) likely helps in cache-sensitive workloads.

Clock speeds tell a nuanced story. The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosts to 4.90 GHz. The i5-11400F runs at 2.60 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost. The Ryzen’s higher boost clock (4.90 vs 4.40) directly supports its single-thread win. Memory support also differs: AMD uses DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel uses DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s. The Ryzen supports ECC memory; Intel does not. PCIe lanes favor Intel at 20 lanes (Gen 4) versus AMD’s 14 lanes (Gen 4). The Ryzen includes integrated Radeon 740M graphics; the i5-11400F has no integrated graphics.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-11400F wins every multi-core benchmark in the dataset, and the margins are often substantial. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 13.8% lead translates to meaningful render-time savings. PassMark integer math shows a 35.3% advantage, indicating the i5 handles arithmetic-heavy tasks like encryption, compression, and scientific computing more effectively. For users running video encoding, 3D rendering, or data processing that scales across cores, the i5-11400F is the clear choice based on the data.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins the PassMark single-thread test by 19.1%. This matters for applications that rely on single-core performance — legacy software, games that don’t scale well across cores, or interactive workloads where response time depends on one thread. The Ryzen’s higher boost clock (4.90 GHz vs 4.40 GHz) and newer Zen 4 architecture likely contribute to this advantage. For users prioritizing snappy single-threaded response over multi-core throughput, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins.

The data also shows the Ryzen has a smaller overall footprint: 4 cores vs 6, lower TDP at 65W (same as Intel), and a smaller die. However, neither the TDP nor die size directly appears in benchmark results — the performance data speaks for itself. The Ryzen’s integrated Radeon 740M graphics is a feature the i5-11400F lacks entirely, which matters for systems without a discrete GPU.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the Intel Core i5-11400F is the stronger processor for the majority of workloads. It wins 15 of 17 benchmarks, including every multi-threaded test, often by 14-35%. The 6-core/12-thread configuration provides a structural advantage that the Ryzen’s newer architecture cannot overcome in parallel tasks. For users running Cinebench renders, PassMark suite workloads, or similar multi-threaded applications, the i5-11400F delivers consistently higher scores.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the choice for single-threaded performance. Its 19.1% lead in PassMark single-thread is the largest margin in either direction across all benchmarks. This makes it suitable for workloads where a single core is the bottleneck, such as certain games or lightly-threaded productivity apps. The Ryzen also offers integrated graphics, ECC memory support, DDR5 compatibility, and a smaller die size. However, the data shows it loses every multi-threaded comparison, so users with heavy parallel workloads should look to Intel.

Both processors sit at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores differ by only 0.6%. This is not a case of one being definitively superior — it is a trade-off between Intel’s core count and AMD’s single-thread efficiency. The i5-11400F is also marked as end-of-life, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G remains active, potentially affecting long-term availability. The launch MSRP for the i5-11400F was $157.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-11400F wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins 2 (the PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests).

Q: How much faster is the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G in single-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen scores 3550 in PassMark single-thread versus Intel’s 2981, a 19.1% advantage.

Q: What is the largest benchmark margin between the two?

A: The largest margin is in PassMark integer math, where Intel scores 57624 against AMD’s 37292, a 35.3% difference.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-11400F has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-11400F does not.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-11400F have integrated graphics?

A: No. The i5-11400F has no integrated graphics, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G includes Radeon 740M graphics.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G | Intel Core i5-11400F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Rocket Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 276 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes | Gen 4, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | None |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2021-03-15 |