AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and the Intel Core 7 350?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G boosts to 4.90 GHz, which is slightly ahead of the Intel Core 7 350's 4.80 GHz boost.

Q: What are the process nodes for these two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is built on TSMC's 4 nm node, while the Intel Core 7 350 uses Intel's 3 nm process.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports ECC memory; the Intel Core 7 350 does not.

Q: What is the L3 cache size on each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, and the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has an average benchmark score of 17278, while the Intel Core 7 350 scores 17779. Both sit at the 71st percentile among all CPUs.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G comes from the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix2 codename. It is a desktop part built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. It features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. It uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and supports ECC memory. The chip interfaces with PCIe Gen 4, providing 14 CPU lanes. Its integrated graphics is the Radeon 740M.

The Intel Core 7 350 is a mobile processor from the Wildcat Lake generation. It uses a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It has 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, plus 6 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, but only through a single-channel memory bus, limiting bandwidth to 59.7 GB/s. It lacks ECC support. The chip provides 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU and integrates Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Intel part is a 6-core, 6-thread design, while the AMD part is a 4-core, 8-thread design, meaning the AMD chip relies on simultaneous multithreading to reach 8 threads.

The memory subsystem is a major architectural split. The AMD chip's dual-channel setup gives it 39% more theoretical memory bandwidth than the Intel chip's single-channel configuration, which directly impacts memory-sensitive workloads. The Intel chip compensates with a larger per-core L2 cache (2.5 MB vs. 1 MB) and a higher single-core clock trajectory, but its base clock is much lower at 1.50 GHz versus 3.40 GHz for the AMD chip.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results show a clear split between multi-core and single-core performance. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins 5 of the 17 head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core 7 350 wins 12. The biggest AMD victory is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 12359 against 8030, a 53.9% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and reflects the AMD chip's higher sustained multi-threaded throughput despite having fewer physical cores. The AMD chip also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 2% (1245 vs. 1220), PassMark data compression by 5.2% (150567 vs. 143123), PassMark integer math by 10.5% (37292 vs. 33734), and PassMark random string sorting by 14.3% (19703 vs. 17238).

The Intel Core 7 350 dominates the single-core and floating-point tests. In Cinebench R15 single-core, it scores 292 against 175, a 40.1% lead. Its Cinebench R20 single-core score is 758 versus 732, a 3.4% edge, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2046 versus 1744, a 14.8% lead. The Intel chip also wins PassMark single-thread by 13.4% (4100 vs. 3550). The floating-point math test shows a massive Intel advantage: 42809 versus 23374, a 45.4% gap. Prime number finding also favors Intel heavily, with a score of 107 versus 47, a 56.1% difference.

The multi-core picture is mixed. Intel wins Cinebench R20 multi-core by 3.4% (5373 vs. 5190) and PassMark multithread by 11.9% (15170 vs. 13368). However, AMD wins the Cinebench R23 multi-core test by a wide margin, suggesting that the newer Cinebench version exposes a different workload balance where AMD's Zen 4 architecture with SMT has an advantage. The PassMark physics test also goes to Intel by 34.2% (1173 vs. 772), and PassMark extended instructions favor Intel by 4.9% (12045 vs. 11451). The data encryption test shows Intel ahead by 21.3% (10933 vs. 8607).

The Verdict

The data supports two distinct usage profiles. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the stronger choice for multi-threaded productivity workloads that scale with sustained thread execution, particularly long-form rendering and integer-heavy processing. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core lead of 53.9% is decisive, and it also wins integer math, data compression, and random string sorting. The Intel Core 7 350 is the better option for single-threaded tasks, floating-point math, encryption, physics simulation, and workloads that respond to higher per-core performance. Its wins in single-core Cinebench tests, floating-point math, and prime number finding are substantial.

Both chips occupy the same 71st percentile among all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores are close (17278 for AMD, 17779 for Intel). The overall averages differ by only 2.9%, despite very different architectural approaches. The AMD chip uses fewer cores with SMT and a higher base clock, while the Intel chip uses more physical cores without SMT and a much lower base clock. The Intel part is a mobile chip with a 15 W TDP, while the AMD part is a desktop chip with a 65 W TDP. For a desktop build with access to dual-channel memory, the AMD chip's memory bandwidth advantage and multi-core results make it the practical pick. For a mobile or low-power system, the Intel chip's single-core strength and lower TDP define its role.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD base clock is 3.40 GHz versus 1.50 GHz for Intel. The AMD boost clock is 4.90 GHz versus 4.80 GHz for Intel. The AMD TDP is 65 W, the Intel TDP is 15 W. The AMD chip uses socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses BGA 1516. The process node is 4 nm for AMD (TSMC) and 3 nm for Intel (Intel foundry). The AMD die is 137 mm² with 20,900 million transistors; the Intel die size and transistor count are not recorded.

Cache configurations differ substantially. AMD provides 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Intel provides 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. Memory support splits: AMD uses dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support; Intel uses single-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC. PCIe lane counts differ: AMD has 14 CPU lanes, Intel has 6. The integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon 740M, Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $469, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP. The release dates are April 2024 for AMD and April 2026 for Intel. Both chips have locked multipliers.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins in multi-threaded rendering workloads, as shown by its 53.9% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and its 2% edge in Cinebench R15 multi-core. It also wins integer math by 10.5%, data compression by 5.2%, and random string sorting by 14.3%. These results point to strong performance in data processing, compression, and integer-heavy computation. Its dual-channel memory interface and higher memory bandwidth (83.2 GB/s vs. 59.7 GB/s) support these workloads.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins in single-threaded performance across every recorded benchmark, from a 3.4% margin in Cinebench R20 single-core to a 40.1% margin in Cinebench R15 single-core. It also wins floating-point math by 45.4%, physics by 34.2%, prime number finding by 56.1%, and data encryption by 21.3%. The extended instructions test goes to Intel by 4.9%. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4100 versus 3550 confirms a 13.4% single-thread advantage. The Intel chip also wins PassMark multithread by 11.9% and Cinebench R20 multi-core by 3.4%, showing that its six physical cores can outpace AMD's four cores in some multi-threaded tests, though not in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The Intel chip's 15 W TDP and mobile socket make it suitable for low-power systems, while the AMD chip's 65 W TDP and desktop socket target conventional desktop builds.