AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive picture: the Intel Core 7 253PE wins all 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G manages no victories. The magnitude of Intel's advantage varies sharply by workload type, ranging from a modest single-thread edge to a dominant showing in floating-point math.

In Cinebench testing, the Intel part consistently outperforms by roughly half. The multicore scores show a near-uniform pattern: R15 multicore records 2507 versus 1245 for AMD, a delta of -50.3%. R20 multicore follows with 10449 against 5190, again a -50.3% gap, and R23 multicore lands at 24880 versus 12359, a -50.3% difference. Single-core Cinebench results tell the same story. R15 single-core shows 354 against 175, a -50.6% delta. R20 single-core yields 1475 versus 732, a -50.4% gap, and R23 single-core reaches 3512 compared to 1744, a -50.3% difference. The consistency of these margins indicates a structural performance advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

PassMark tests reveal where the gap widens or narrows. The smallest margin appears in single-thread performance, where Intel scores 3955 against AMD's 3550, a -10.2% delta. This is the only test where the two processors approach parity. The largest discrepancy shows in floating-point math, where Intel's 80870 dwarfs AMD's 23374, a -71.1% gap. Integer math follows with 114158 versus 37292, a -67.3% delta, and prime number finding shows 138 against 47, a -65.9% difference. Data compression results in 339133 versus 150567, a -55.6% gap, while multithread scores read 29271 against 13368, a -54.3% delta. Data encryption delivers 18385 versus 8607, a -53.2% difference, and physics tests record 1845 against 772, a -58.2% gap. Extended instructions produce 21806 versus 11451, a -47.5% delta, and random string sorting shows 32777 against 19703, a -39.9% difference.

The overall average benchmark score confirms the scale of separation. Intel's average sits at 40557, while AMD's reaches 17278. This places Intel in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, but AMD in the 71st. The nearest rival data provides context for each part's standing. AMD's closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 3 210 with an average score of 17321, a -0.2% delta, followed by the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 at 17333, a -0.3% delta, and the Intel Core i5-12450H at 17239, a 0.2% delta. Intel's nearest competitors include the Intel Core 5 223PE at 40585, a -0.1% delta, the Intel Xeon 6357P at 40630, a -0.2% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H at 40431, a 0.3% delta. Both processors sit at the center of their respective performance clusters, with neither showing an outlier position among direct rivals.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge substantially in their underlying designs. AMD's Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses a Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, with the Phoenix2 codename. It belongs to the 8000 series and the Ryzen 3 generation. Intel's Core 7 253PE runs on the Bartlett Lake codename with a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, belonging to the Core 7 generation.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. AMD provides 4 cores and 8 threads, while Intel offers 10 cores and 20 threads. This 2.5x core advantage and 2.5x thread advantage underpin many of the multicore benchmark results. Clock speeds tell a contrasting story. AMD's base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost of 4.90 GHz. Intel's base clock is lower at 2.50 GHz, but its boost reaches 5.50 GHz. Both processors have a 65 TDP rating.

Cache hierarchies show distinct approaches. AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a much larger 33 MB of shared L3. The larger L3 cache on Intel likely contributes to its data-heavy workload advantages.

Memory support and platform features add further separation. AMD supports DDR5 memory exclusively with dual-channel operation and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with a higher bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics also diverge. AMD includes a Radeon 740M, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 730. Socket compatibility places AMD on the AM5 platform and Intel on Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. AMD's die size measures 137 mm² with 20,900 million transistors; Intel's die size and transistor count are not recorded. Release dates differ, with AMD launching on April 15, 2024, and Intel on March 8, 2026. Intel carries a launch MSRP of $384; AMD has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The workload split is unambiguous. Intel wins every recorded benchmark category, so the practical question becomes where its advantage is largest versus smallest. For applications relying heavily on floating-point arithmetic, such as scientific computing or simulation workloads, Intel's 71.1% lead in floating-point math makes it the clear choice. Integer-heavy tasks, including financial modeling or data processing, show a 67.3% advantage. Prime number finding, representative of certain cryptographic or number-theoretic workloads, shows a 65.9% edge.

Data compression and encryption workloads favor Intel substantially. The 55.6% gap in data compression and 53.2% gap in data encryption suggest that database operations, file archiving, and secure communications tasks would see significant throughput gains on the Intel part. Physics calculations, often used in gaming physics or engineering simulation, show a 58.2% advantage.

Multithreaded workloads show a 54.3% gap, which aligns with Intel's 10-core, 20-thread configuration versus AMD's 4-core, 8-thread setup. Extended instruction workloads, which may include SIMD or specialized instruction sets, show a 47.5% advantage. Random string sorting, relevant to certain sorting algorithms and text processing, shows a 39.9% edge.

The narrowest gap appears in single-thread performance. The 10.2% delta in PassMark single-thread tests indicates that AMD's Zen 4 architecture with its 4.90 GHz boost clock remains competitive for lightly threaded applications. For workloads that depend primarily on single-core speed, such as certain legacy applications or lightly threaded productivity tools, the distinction between these processors shrinks considerably. The Cinebench single-core results, however, tell a different story, with a 50.3% to 50.6% gap favoring Intel. The discrepancy between PassMark single-thread and Cinebench single-core results highlights that the performance relationship depends heavily on the specific test methodology.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear differentiation. The Intel Core 7 253PE delivers substantially higher throughput across every measured category, with an average benchmark score of 40557 compared to 17278 for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G. The 87th percentile ranking for Intel versus 71st for AMD places them in different performance tiers entirely.

For users selecting between these two processors, the choice depends on workload characteristics. The Intel part dominates in multithreaded applications, floating-point math, integer math, data compression, encryption, physics calculations, and extended instruction workloads. Its 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 10-core, 20-thread configuration provide the resources needed for demanding parallel workloads.

The AMD part retains relevance only in the narrow single-thread PassMark measurement, where the gap shrinks to 10.2%. For users whose primary workloads involve lightly threaded tasks that do not scale across many cores, the AMD processor may suffice, but the Cinebench single-core results contradict even that conclusion, showing a 50.3% disadvantage. The AMD processor does offer a smaller die size at 137 mm² and a more modern 4 nm process node, which may appeal from an efficiency standpoint, though the TDP ratings are identical at 65.

The Intel Core 7 253PE carries a launch MSRP of $384, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G. The benchmark data indicates that the Intel processor commands a performance advantage that spans all measured categories, making it the stronger choice for users who prioritize raw performance across diverse workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has an average benchmark score of 40557, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has an average score of 17278.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap appears in PassMark floating-point math, where the Intel Core 7 253PE scores 80870 against 23374 for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G, a -71.1% delta.

Q: What is the smallest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The smallest gap appears in PassMark single-thread tests, where the Intel Core 7 253PE scores 3955 against 3550 for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G, a -10.2% delta.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 7 253PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: What are the percentile rankings for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE ranks in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G ranks in the 71st percentile.