AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

The benchmark data presents a fascinating clash of design philosophies: the Intel Core 7 150U is a 10-core mobile chip built for efficiency, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is a 4-core desktop part with a much higher power envelope. The results are not a clean sweep for either side; instead, they reveal a split personality where each processor dominates specific types of workloads. The Intel chip wins 12 of the 17 head-to-head tests, but the AMD chip takes the crown in the most modern and demanding multi-threaded benchmark, suggesting that raw core count isn't the only path to performance.

The Verdict

The data suggests two distinct buyer profiles. The Intel Core 7 150U is the clear choice for users prioritizing single-threaded responsiveness and general productivity. It leads by 45.1% in Cinebench R15 single-core, a massive margin, and maintains an advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core with a 7.5% lead. Its 10 cores and 12 threads also give it a significant edge in older multi-threaded tests and integer-heavy workloads, where it posts a 36.9% win in Passmark integer math. This makes it the better option for everyday applications, office work, and light content creation where snappy, per-core performance is paramount.

Conversely, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the superior choice for sustained, heavily parallelized workloads. Its victory in Cinebench R23 multi-core is decisive, with a score of 12359 versus 8883, a staggering 28.1% deficit for the Intel part. This indicates that the Zen 4 architecture, despite having only 4 cores and 8 threads, is far more efficient at scaling with modern multi-threaded software. The AMD chip also shows strength in extended instruction set performance (Passmark extended instructions, 23.6% lead) and random string sorting (7.3% lead), pointing to a more capable execution engine for complex, data-intensive tasks. Users running video renders, 3D simulations, or heavy code compilation should gravitate toward the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental architectural split is stark. The Intel Core 7 150U is built on a 10 nm process by Intel, featuring a Raptor Lake-U design with 10 cores and 12 threads. Its cache hierarchy is notable for a large 12 MB shared L3 cache and a generous 1.25 MB L2 per core. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is a Zen 4 part, manufactured by TSMC on a much more advanced 4 nm node. It has only 4 cores and 8 threads but compensates with a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz compared to Intel's 1.80 GHz. The AMD chip features a smaller 8 MB shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core but is built on a significantly smaller 137 mm² die with 20,900 million transistors.

These differences lead to divergent design goals. The Intel chip is a mobile-focused part with a 15 W TDP, designed for battery life and thermal efficiency in thin-and-light laptops. The AMD chip is a desktop part with a 65 W TDP, allowing it to sustain higher clock speeds and power draw. Their memory support also diverges: Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD is exclusively DDR5, and the AMD part has a specified memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, a figure not listed for the Intel chip. Furthermore, the AMD chip supports ECC memory, a feature the Intel part lacks, making it potentially more suited for reliability-sensitive workstation tasks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, where the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins decisively. The Intel Core 7 150U scores 8883, while the AMD chip reaches 12359, a 28.1% lead. This is a monumental upset given Intel's 10-core advantage and suggests the Zen 4 architecture's superior IPC (instructions per clock) and the higher power envelope are more impactful than sheer core count in this modern test.

However, the Intel part dominates in legacy and synthetic tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel chip wins with a 20.9% lead (1505.5 vs 1245). The single-core delta in R15 is even more pronounced, with Intel winning by 45.1% (254 vs 175). This pattern suggests the Intel chip scales better with older, less optimized software that leverages its higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus AMD's 4.90 GHz. The Intel part also takes a 47.2% lead in Passmark floating point math and a 36.9% lead in integer math, showcasing its dominance in raw arithmetic throughput.

The AMD chip's wins are not limited to R23 multi-core. It also wins Passmark extended instructions by 23.6% (11451 vs 8748), a test that measures performance on more complex, modern instruction sets. It also edges out Intel in Passmark single-thread (3550 vs 3508) and random string sorting (19703 vs 18269). The single-thread win, albeit by a small 1.2% margin, is significant because it shows the Zen 4 core is competitive with Intel's best single-core performance despite the R15 anomaly. The overall picture is one of Intel leading in throughput-heavy tasks, while AMD wins in efficiency-of-execution and modern instruction handling.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every core specification. The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores and 8 threads. Intel's base clock is 1.80 GHz, significantly lower than AMD's 3.40 GHz, but Intel's boost clock is higher at 5.40 GHz versus AMD's 4.90 GHz. The TDP is another major divider, with Intel at 15 W and AMD at 65 W.

The cache configurations are also distinct: Intel provides 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, while AMD offers 64 KB and 1 MB per core, respectively. At the L3 level, Intel has 12 MB shared, while AMD has 8 MB shared. The process node differs (10 nm Intel vs 4 nm TSMC), and their sockets are incompatible (Intel BGA 1744 vs AMD Socket AM5). The integrated graphics differ as well: Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while AMD has Radeon 740M. Finally, the AMD part supports ECC memory and offers 14 CPU PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the Intel chip offers only 8 lanes, a significant difference for expansion capability.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U shows a massive 45.1% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core and a 7.5% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core. However, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins the Passmark single-thread test by a slim 1.2% margin, indicating a closer contest in modern single-threaded applications.

Q: Does the Intel chip's higher core count guarantee better multi-threaded performance?

A: No. While the Intel chip wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 20.9% and Passmark multi-thread by 10%, the AMD chip wins the more modern Cinebench R23 multi-core test by a commanding 28.1%. This indicates that the AMD chip's architecture is more efficient for sustained, modern parallel workloads.

Q: What are the key architectural differences?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U is a 10 nm Raptor Lake part with 10 cores and a 15 W TDP. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is a 4 nm Zen 4 part with 4 cores and a 65 W TDP. They have different sockets, cache sizes, and memory support, with AMD supporting ECC and exclusively DDR5.

Q: Which processor is better for gaming?

A: The data does not include gaming benchmarks. However, the AMD chip's higher base clock and better performance in modern multi-threaded tests could suggest an advantage, but the Intel chip's superior single-core performance in Cinebench R23 and its larger L3 cache might also be favorable. The data is inconclusive without specific gaming tests.

Q: Which chip has better integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U features Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G features Radeon 740M. No benchmark data is provided for the integrated GPUs, so a direct performance comparison cannot be made from this information.

Q: What are the TDP and power implications?

A: The Intel chip has a 15 W TDP, designed for mobile devices with limited cooling and power budgets. The AMD chip has a 65 W TDP, suitable for desktop systems. This difference implies the AMD chip can sustain higher performance but requires more substantial cooling and power delivery.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 150U is the clear winner in legacy and general-purpose computing. It dominates in Cinebench R15 (both single and multi-core), Passmark integer math, floating point math, and data encryption. Its 47.2% lead in floating point math and 36.9% lead in integer math make it the superior choice for spreadsheet calculations, financial modeling, and older software that isn't optimized for the latest instruction sets. Its 10% win in Passmark multi-thread also suggests better performance in common multi-tasking scenarios. The data positions this chip as a productivity powerhouse for everyday use.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the winner in modern, heavily threaded, and specialized workloads. Its 28.1% victory in Cinebench R23 multi-core is the headline, indicating it is the better part for video editing, 3D rendering, and other modern creative applications. Its 23.6% lead in Passmark extended instructions suggests it handles more complex, newer code more efficiently. The wins in random string sorting and single-thread performance, while smaller, reinforce its strength in data processing tasks and modern software environments. The data suggests this chip is for users who push their systems with demanding, current-generation workloads.