AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Intel Core 5 223PTE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and Intel Core 5 223PTE?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock, and what are the recorded values?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE reaches a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G boosts to 4.90 GHz. The Intel part also has a lower base clock at 2.30 GHz compared to 3.40 GHz for the AMD.

Q: How do the cache configurations differ between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports DDR5 memory only. The Intel Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, with the Intel part showing a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 83.2 GB/s for the AMD.

Q: What are the integrated graphics units in each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G includes a Radeon 740M integrated GPU. The Intel Core 5 223PTE includes UHD Graphics 770.

Q: Which processor has the higher process node and what are the respective nodes?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD part also has a smaller die size at 137 mm² and a transistor count of 20,900 million, while the Intel part has no recorded transistor or die size data.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a clear split between a processor with measured benchmark results and one without any benchmark entries. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark scores, an average benchmark score of 17278, and sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and sits at the 50th percentile. For any user making a decision strictly from the database, the AMD part is the only one with direct performance evidence to support a selection.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G also has a much newer release date of April 2024, whereas the Intel Core 5 223PTE is listed with a release date of March 2026, which is in the future relative to the AMD part. Both processors are listed as Active in production status and have locked multipliers. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The core count difference matters in workloads that scale with threads. The Intel Core 5 223PTE offers 8 cores and 16 threads, double the AMD part's 4 cores and 8 threads. However, without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm how that thread advantage translates into measured performance. The AMD part's recorded scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12359 and a single-core score of 1744, provide concrete reference points for expected performance. The Intel part's 50th percentile ranking, with no supporting scores, appears to be a placeholder rather than a measured result.

For a user prioritizing verified performance data, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the only processor with measurable results. The Intel Core 5 223PTE offers higher core counts and a higher boost clock, but the absence of recorded benchmark scores means the database cannot validate its performance claims. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD part is the known quantity, while the Intel part is unverified in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table in the database is empty, and the wins count shows 0 for both processors. This means there are no direct comparative scores recorded between the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and the Intel Core 5 223PTE. The analysis must therefore rely on the AMD part's individual benchmark results and the Intel part's lack of recorded scores.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12359 and a single-core score of 1744. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 5190 and the single-core score is 732. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 1245 and the single-core score is 175. These scores show a consistent single-core to multi-core scaling pattern across the three Cinebench versions.

PassMark results for the AMD part include a multi-thread score of 13368 and a single-thread score of 3550. The integer math score is 37292, floating point math is 23374, and extended instructions score is 11451. Data compression scores 150567, data encryption scores 8607, random string sorting scores 19703, and find prime numbers scores 47. Physics scores 772.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G are listed in the database. The Intel Core i5-12450H has an average score of 17239, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD part's 17278. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has an average score of 17321, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 has an average score of 17333, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i5-11400F has an average score of 17177, which is 0.6% lower. These close margins place the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G in a narrow performance band around the 17200 to 17300 average score range.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE has no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, which prevents any comparison of its measured performance against the AMD part or any other processor. The database cannot produce a head-to-head comparison because one side has no data.

The absence of head-to-head benchmarks means the biggest wins each way cannot be quantified. The AMD part wins by virtue of having recorded scores at all. The Intel part has no wins recorded because no measurements exist to support any. The data shows that the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is within 0.6% of four different rival processors, which indicates its performance is competitive with a broad range of CPUs in the same average score band. The Intel Core 5 223PTE cannot be placed in any similar comparison because the database has no scores for it.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field recorded in the database.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, doubling both counts.

Clock speeds differ in both directions. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Intel part boosts higher but idles lower.

Thermal design power differs. The AMD part is rated at 65 W, while the Intel part is rated at 45 W.

Sockets are different. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses AMD Socket AM5. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node and foundry differ. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD part has a recorded transistor count of 20,900 million and a die size of 137 mm². The Intel part has no recorded transistor count or die size.

Cache configurations differ at every level. The AMD part has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. The Intel part has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 only. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory. The memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s for the AMD part and 89.6 GB/s for the Intel part. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD part has Radeon 740M. The Intel part has UHD Graphics 770.

Release dates differ. The AMD part was released on April 15, 2024. The Intel part has a release date of March 8, 2026.

The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $232. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

Market segment is listed as Desktop for both. Both processors have locked multipliers. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G belongs to the 8000 series and uses Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix2. Its generation is listed as Ryzen 3 (Zen 4 (Phoenix)). The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses the codename Bartlett Lake, and its generation is listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). The Intel part has no architecture field recorded.

The manufacturing approach differs at the foundry level. The AMD part is built by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The Intel part is built by Intel on a 10 nm process. The AMD part has a recorded transistor count of 20,900 million and a die size of 137 mm². The Intel part has no transistor or die size data recorded.

Cache architecture differs by design. The AMD part uses 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has three times the shared L3 cache of the AMD part.

Memory architecture differs in supported types. The AMD part supports DDR5 only. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Intel part shows higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s compared to 83.2 GB/s for the AMD part. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe architecture differs in generation and lane count. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics architecture differs. The AMD part uses Radeon 740M. The Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

The AMD part has a release date of April 2024, making it an established product in the database. The Intel part has a release date of March 2026, which is later than the AMD part. Both are listed as Active in production status.

The AMD part's process node advantage at 4 nm versus 10 nm suggests a denser transistor layout, but the Intel part compensates with a larger cache allocation and higher boost clock. The database records no benchmark scores for the Intel part, so the architectural differences cannot be validated through measured performance.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins in the area of verified performance data. The database contains a complete set of benchmark scores for this processor, including Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core tests, plus a full PassMark suite. Its average benchmark score of 17278 places it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival data shows it is within 0.6% of four processors in the 17177 to 17333 average score range, which indicates tight competition in its performance class.

The AMD part also wins on process node with a 4 nm process at TSMC versus the Intel part's 10 nm process at Intel. It has a recorded transistor count of 20,900 million and a die size of 137 mm². The AMD part has a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz compared to 2.30 GHz for the Intel part. It also has a lower thermal design power of 65 W, which is still higher than the Intel part's 45 W, so the TDP comparison does not favor the AMD part.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE wins on core count with 8 cores and 16 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads for the AMD part. It also has a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz compared to 4.90 GHz. The Intel part has a larger cache allocation with 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3, compared to 64 KB, 1 MB, and 8 MB for the AMD part. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports DDR5 only. The Intel part has higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s versus 83.2 GB/s. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes. The Intel part has a lower TDP at 45 W versus 65 W. The Intel part also has a recorded launch MSRP of $232.

The Intel part wins on paper specifications across cores, threads, cache, memory bandwidth, PCIe generation, and boost clock. However, the database has no benchmark scores for the Intel part, so these specification advantages cannot be confirmed through measured performance. The AMD part wins on the strength of its recorded benchmark results and its placement at the 71st percentile.

For use cases that depend on verified multi-threaded performance, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has recorded Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12359 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 13368. For single-thread performance, it has a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1744 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3550. These are the only measured data points available for either processor.

For use cases that depend on core count, cache size, or memory flexibility, the Intel Core 5 223PTE presents the stronger specification sheet. The database simply lacks the benchmark data to confirm how those specifications perform in practice. The AMD part is the only processor with measurable wins in the database, while the Intel part has no recorded wins.