AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Intel Arc G3

The database contains benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G, while the Intel Arc G3 entry has no recorded benchmark scores. This creates an asymmetric comparison: the AMD processor has a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results, whereas the Intel part currently has no measured performance data. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G achieves an average benchmark score of 17,278, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs tracked. The Intel Arc G3, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, reflecting the absence of any completed tests in the database. This analysis will therefore rely on the AMD processor’s measured results, its position among comparable CPUs, and the architectural specifications listed for both parts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons exist between the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and the Intel Arc G3. The database shows zero wins for each part in this pairing, and the head-to-head benchmark field is empty. Consequently, no exact score differentials can be cited for these two specific processors. The available data instead comes from the AMD processor’s standalone benchmark suite, which provides a basis for evaluating its performance profile.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,359 and a single-core score of 1,744. In Cinebench R20, it records 5,190 multi-core and 732 single-core points. The older Cinebench R15 tests show 1,245 multi-core and 175 single-core results. These numbers indicate a strong single-threaded showing, typical of the Zen 4 architecture, while the multi-core scores reflect its 4-core, 8-thread configuration.

PassMark results for the AMD processor include a multi-thread score of 13,368 and a single-thread score of 3,550. Integer math performance reaches 37,292, floating point math scores 23,374, and extended instructions achieve 11,451. Data compression performance is recorded at 150,567, while data encryption scores 8,607. The processor also handles physics calculations with a score of 772, finds prime numbers at a rate of 47, and sorts random strings at 19,703. These figures collectively paint a picture of a capable desktop processor, particularly for integer-heavy workloads.

When compared to its nearest rivals in the database, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G shows a 0.2% advantage over the Intel Core i5-12450H, which has an average score of 17,239. It trails the AMD Ryzen 3 210 by 0.2% (that part scores 17,321) and the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 by 0.3% (17,333). The AMD processor leads the Intel Core i5-11400F by 0.6%, with that rival scoring 17,177. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G sits in a tightly contested performance band where small margins separate the contenders.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows that the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is a fully benchmarked desktop processor with a 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 17,278 places it in the upper-middle tier of the database. The Intel Arc G3, despite being an active product, has no benchmark entries, no average score, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects a lack of measured data rather than actual performance. From a pure data perspective, the AMD processor is the only one with verifiable results, making it the clear choice for any workload analysis that depends on recorded measurements.

The Intel Arc G3’s specifications indicate a mobile processor with 14 cores and 14 threads, a base clock of 1.90 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It carries a TDP of 25 watts, which is substantially lower than the AMD part’s 65-watt TDP. However, without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how that lower power draw translates into performance. The AMD processor’s 4 cores and 8 threads, boosting to 4.90 GHz, may appear modest on paper, but its measured results demonstrate strong efficiency per core.

For users selecting a processor based on available evidence, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G delivers quantifiable results across rendering, encryption, compression, and math workloads. The Intel Arc G3 remains an unknown quantity in the database, and no recommendation can be made from benchmark data that does not exist. The verdict from the recorded information is straightforward: choose the AMD processor if measured performance is the criterion, and treat the Intel part as unverified until tests are completed.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins in every category where data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,359 indicates strong rendering capability for a 4-core part, while the single-core score of 1,744 shows high per-thread efficiency. PassMark’s integer math score of 37,292 suggests solid performance in general-purpose computing tasks, and the data compression score of 150,567 points to effective handling of archive and storage workloads. The encryption score of 8,607 and extended instructions score of 11,451 further demonstrate versatility across security-related and SIMD-heavy applications.

The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark wins because no benchmark results are recorded. Its specifications, however, hint at potential strengths in specific areas. The 14-core configuration with 14 threads (no hyperthreading) could benefit multi-threaded workloads in theory, but the 1.90 GHz base clock is modest, and the 4.60 GHz boost clock is lower than the AMD part’s 4.90 GHz. The LPDDR5X memory support with 136.5 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the AMD processor’s 83.2 GB/s, which could favor memory-intensive operations. The integrated Arc B370 graphics and PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only) are notable features, but without test scores, these remain theoretical advantages.

The AMD processor’s 4 nm process node from TSMC and 65-watt TDP position it as a desktop-focused part with a balance of power and performance. The Intel part’s 3 nm process node from Intel’s own foundry and 25-watt TDP indicate a mobile-oriented design prioritizing efficiency. In the database’s current state, the AMD processor wins all measurable categories, while the Intel part’s wins are speculative at best.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: Yes, it has 17 recorded benchmark results, including Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests plus PassMark scores for compression, encryption, math, and other workloads. Its average benchmark score is 17,278.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists zero benchmarks for the Intel Arc G3. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals recorded.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It leads the Intel Core i5-12450H by 0.2% and the Intel Core i5-11400F by 0.6%. It trails the AMD Ryzen 3 210 by 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 by 0.3%.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The Intel Arc G3 supports LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What are the TDP values for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a TDP of 65 watts. The Intel Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G boosts to 4.90 GHz. The Intel Arc G3 boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and the Intel Arc G3 are listed as active production parts.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix2, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It contains 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake codename with a 3 nm process at Intel’s own foundry, though its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part offers 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 cache on the Intel part could benefit workloads that rely on frequent data reuse, though no benchmark data confirms this.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD processor uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, achieving 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and supports ECC memory. The Intel part uses LPDDR5X in dual-channel mode, reaching 136.5 GB/s bandwidth, but does not support ECC. The higher bandwidth on the Intel part may matter for memory-bound tasks, but again, no measured scores back this up.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part offers PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). The newer PCIe Gen 5 standard on the Intel part could enable faster data transfer to compatible devices, but the lane count is lower.

Integrated graphics are present on both. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G includes Radeon 740M graphics, while the Intel Arc G3 features Arc B370 graphics. Neither has dedicated benchmark scores for its iGPU in the database.

The AMD processor is a desktop part on Socket AM5, while the Intel part is mobile on BGA 2540. Production status for both is active, with release dates of April 15, 2024 for the AMD and May 27, 2026 for the Intel. Neither part has an unlocked multiplier, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP.

The architectures reflect different design goals: the AMD part emphasizes per-core performance with a 4.90 GHz boost and 65-watt TDP, while the Intel part prioritizes core count and memory bandwidth within a 25-watt envelope. The database’s measurements, however, only validate the AMD processor’s performance characteristics.