AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs AMD Ryzen 5 4500 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G occupy nearly the same average benchmark tier—17333 versus 17278, a 0.3% gap—yet they achieve that parity through completely different means. The 4500 leans on six Zen 2 cores and twelve threads, while the 8300G counters with four Zen 4 cores, a much higher boost clock, and a newer platform. The data shows a clear split: the 4500 dominates multi-threaded and memory-heavy workloads, while the 8300G wins single-thread and physics-based tests. The choice between them hinges on whether you prioritize raw throughput or platform modernity and per-core efficiency.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 4500 is the decisive winner in almost every multithreaded benchmark. Across the entire head-to-head set, it claims 13 wins out of 17 tests, with margins that range from 10.7% to a massive 58%. Its six cores and twelve threads give it a structural advantage in parallel workloads like video encoding, compilation, and data processing. The passmark multithread score of 16091 versus 13368—a 20.4% lead—shows that any workload that scales across cores will favor the 4500. Data compression is its standout victory, scoring 228741 against 150567, a 51.9% advantage that indicates a strong showing in archiving or database tasks. Similarly, data encryption shows a 58% lead, making the 4500 the clear pick for security-related or cryptographic workloads.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G wins in only four areas, but they are telling. Its most significant win is in passmark single_thread, where it scores 3550 against 2593—a 27% advantage. This is a direct result of its 4.90 GHz boost clock and newer Zen 4 architecture, which delivers far better instructions-per-clock than the older Zen 2 design. It also wins passmark_find_prime_numbers (47 vs 34, a 27.7% lead) and passmark_physics (772 vs 726, a 6% lead). These wins point to workloads that are latency-sensitive or rely on a single thread's peak performance, such as older games, scripting, or light productivity tasks where the processor cannot use all its cores effectively.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 4500 has an average benchmark score of 17333, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17278. This puts the 4500 ahead by 0.3%, and both processors sit at the 71st percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G have any advantage in single-core performance?

A: Yes, significantly. In passmark_single_thread, the 8300G scores 3550 versus the 4500's 2593, a 27% lead. This stems from its higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz and newer Zen 4 architecture.

Q: Which processor is better for multi-threaded applications?

A: The Ryzen 5 4500. It leads in every Cinebench multi-core test, including R23 multi-core with a score of 13677 versus 12359, a 10.7% margin. It also wins passmark_multithread with 16091 versus 13368, a 20.4% advantage.

Q: What are the socket and memory differences between the two?

A: The Ryzen 5 4500 uses AMD Socket AM4 and supports DDR4 memory, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5. The 8300G also supports ECC memory, which the 4500 does not.

Q: Does the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has integrated Radeon 740M graphics. The Ryzen 5 4500 has no integrated graphics, meaning it requires a discrete GPU.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. The Ryzen 5 4500 has an unlocked multiplier, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is locked.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided victories for the Ryzen 5 4500 come in the Passmark suite. Data encryption shows the largest relative gap, with the 4500 scoring 13597 against the 8300G's 8607—a 58% lead. This is not a marginal win; it is a near-doubling of performance in that specific test. Data compression follows closely, with the 4500 at 228741 versus 150567, a 51.9% margin. Integer math also favors the 4500 heavily, scoring 49707 against 37292, a 33.3% lead. Floating-point math shows a similar story, with the 4500 ahead by 25.8% (29405 vs 23374). Even in extended instructions, the 4500 maintains a 32.4% lead (15166 vs 11451). These results indicate that the 4500's extra cores are not just a paper advantage—they translate into substantial real-world throughput in compute-heavy tasks.

The Cinebench results are consistent but less dramatic. Across R15, R20, and R23, the 4500 wins both single-core and multi-core tests by exactly 10.7% or 10.9%. For example, Cinebench R23 multi-core shows the 4500 at 13677 and the 8300G at 12359, a 10.7% gap. The single-core R20 test shows 810 versus 732, also a 10.7% lead for the 4500. This is surprising given the 8300G's single-thread win in Passmark, but the Cinebench single-core tests are older and may not scale with the 8300G's higher boost clock as effectively. The 4500 also wins passmark_multithread by 20.4% (16091 vs 13368) and random_string_sorting by 21.8% (23989 vs 19703).

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G's victories are concentrated in specific niches. Its passmark_single_thread score of 3550 is a full 27% higher than the 4500's 2593, a margin that dwarfs the 4500's wins in most other tests. It also wins find_prime_numbers with 47 versus 34, a 27.7% advantage, and physics with 772 versus 726, a 6% lead. These wins highlight the 8300G's strength in tasks that are hard to parallelize and depend on raw clock speed and architectural efficiency. The physics test, in particular, suggests that the 8300G may handle older or less-threaded game engines better than the 4500, despite having fewer cores.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every fundamental specification. The Ryzen 5 4500 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores and 8 threads. The 4500 has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, whereas the 8300G has a lower base of 3.40 GHz but a much higher boost of 4.90 GHz. Both have a 65W TDP, but the 4500 uses the older AMD Socket AM4, while the 8300G requires the newer AMD Socket AM5.

Memory support is a major split. The 4500 supports DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the 8300G supports DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The 8300G also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the 4500. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the 4500 offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the 8300G offers Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The 8300G includes integrated Radeon 740M graphics, while the 4500 has none. The 4500 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking; the 8300G does not. The 4500 has a launch MSRP of $129; the 8300G has no listed launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap is generational. The Ryzen 5 4500 is built on Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Renoir, using a 7 nm process from TSMC. It contains 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die. The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the newer Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix2, on a 4 nm process, also from TSMC. It packs 20,900 million transistors into a smaller 137 mm² die. This density increase is a key reason why the 8300G achieves higher boost clocks and better single-thread performance despite having fewer cores.

Cache configurations also differ. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 8 MB of shared L3 cache, but the L2 cache differs: the 4500 has 512 KB per core, while the 8300G has 1 MB per core. The 8300G's larger L2 cache, combined with its more advanced process node, contributes to its higher instructions-per-clock. The 4500's advantage comes from having 50% more cores and 50% more threads, which allows it to brute-force parallel workloads even with an older architecture. The 8300G's integrated Radeon 740M graphics also represent a significant architectural addition, making it a complete system on a chip, whereas the 4500 relies entirely on a separate GPU.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous for multithreaded productivity. The Ryzen 5 4500 wins 13 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, including every Cinebench test and all major Passmark compute tests. If your work involves video rendering, software compilation, data compression, or any task that can use six cores and twelve threads, the 4500 is the stronger choice. Its 20.4% lead in passmark_multithread and 51.9% lead in data compression are not minor differences—they will translate directly into faster completion times. The unlocked multiplier also adds flexibility for enthusiasts willing to push the older platform further. With a launch MSRP of $129, it offers a clear performance tier advantage for less money.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the right pick for a different set of priorities. Its 27% lead in passmark_single_thread makes it the better option for lightly-threaded applications, older games, or any software that is bottlenecked by a single core's speed. The physics test win (772 vs 726) suggests it may handle game logic more smoothly. The 8300G also brings platform advantages: DDR5 support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, PCIe Gen 4, ECC memory, and integrated Radeon 740M graphics. For a compact or office build where a discrete GPU is unnecessary, the 8300G is a complete package. The newer 4 nm Zen 4 architecture also makes it more power-efficient per core, though both chips share the same 65W TDP.

Choose the Ryzen 5 4500 if your workloads are parallel and you want maximum throughput for the dollar. Choose the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G if you need single-thread speed, a modern AM5 platform, integrated graphics, or ECC support. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, but they achieve that parity in opposite ways, and the right choice depends entirely on what you ask the processor to do.