AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Intel Xeon W-2133 Comparison

The benchmark data presents a fascinating generational clash: the Intel Xeon W-2133, a 14 nm workstation part from 2017, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U, a 7 nm mobile processor from 2023. Despite their vastly different design goals and power envelopes, the head-to-head results show an extraordinarily tight race. The Intel Xeon W-2133 wins every single Cinebench test, but the margins are razor-thin, with the largest delta being just 0.7%. This is a statistical dead heat in raw compute, decided by the slimmest of margins, making the choice between them a matter of platform priorities rather than pure performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking finding is the complete sweep by the Intel Xeon W-2133 across all six Cinebench tests. In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the Xeon scores 1075 against the Ryzen's 1068, a 0.7% advantage. The single-core result is equally close: 151 versus 150, also a 0.7% delta. This pattern repeats almost identically in newer benchmark versions. In Cinebench R20, the Xeon leads with 4483 versus 4454 in multicore (0.7%) and 632 versus 628 in single-core (0.6%). The Cinebench R23 results continue the trend: 10676 versus 10605 in multicore and 1507 versus 1497 in single-core, both showing a 0.7% lead for the Intel part.

What makes these results remarkable is the underlying hardware disparity. The Xeon W-2133 achieves these scores with six cores and twelve threads, a 140-watt TDP, and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U counters with just four cores and eight threads, a 15-watt TDP, and a much higher boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Ryzen's higher clock speed nearly compensates for its two-core deficit, but not quite. The average benchmark score tells the same story: the Xeon averages 3087 across all tests, while the Ryzen averages 3063. The Ryzen's additional Geekbench scores (4532 multicore, 1573 single-core) are not included in the head-to-head comparison but do contribute to its average, pulling it slightly down relative to the Xeon's six-test average.

The closest rival data reinforces the competitive positioning. The Xeon W-2133 sits at the 52nd percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i7-8700B at a 0% delta. The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U also holds the 52nd percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 4980U at a -0.1% delta. Both processors are essentially mid-pack performers in the broader CPU landscape, and their head-to-head scores confirm that they are near-perfect equivalents in Cinebench workloads. The Xeon's wins are consistent but negligible in real-world terms; no user would perceive a 0.7% difference. The data clearly shows that the architectural efficiency of the 7 nm Zen 3 design completely neutralizes the older Skylake-W's core-count and memory-bandwidth advantages in these specific tests.

The Verdict

The verdict from the data is unambiguous: choose the Intel Xeon W-2133 if you require a workstation platform with extensive PCIe connectivity, quad-channel memory, and a server-grade feature set. Its six cores and twelve threads provide a slight, albeit measurable, edge in every Cinebench test. The Xeon's 48 PCIe Gen 3 lanes and 85.3 GB/s memory bandwidth are significant platform advantages that no benchmark in this pack captures. It is an end-of-life product, but for a static workstation build, the data shows it delivers identical single-threaded and multi-threaded performance to the Ryzen.

Choose the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U if you need a modern, active, and efficient mobile processor. The data shows it matches the Xeon within 0.7% across all tests while consuming a fraction of the power (15 W TDP versus 140 W). It also includes integrated Radeon Graphics (Vega 6), which the Xeon lacks entirely. The Ryzen's 4.30 GHz boost clock and 7 nm process node from TSMC are clear technological advancements. For a laptop or compact system, the Ryzen is the only rational choice given the data, as the Xeon's workstation advantages are irrelevant in a mobile context. The Ryzen's active production status and newer release date (2023 versus 2017) further support its selection for new designs.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2133 wins all multi-core Cinebench tests. It scores 1075 in R15, 4483 in R20, and 10676 in R23, versus the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U's 1068, 4454, and 10605 respectively. The margin is a consistent 0.7%.

Q: How do the single-core scores compare?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2133 also wins single-core tests, but by a fraction. In Cinebench R15, it scores 151 versus 150 (0.7% delta). In R20, it scores 632 versus 628 (0.6%), and in R23, it scores 1507 versus 1497 (0.7%).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U have any benchmark wins?

A: No. In the provided head-to-head benchmark data, the Intel Xeon W-2133 wins all six tests. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U has zero wins in this comparison.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each CPU?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2133 has an average benchmark score of 3087. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U has an average score of 3063. Both processors occupy the 52nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the power consumption differ?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2133 has a TDP of 140 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U has a TDP of just 15 watts. This indicates a massive efficiency advantage for the AMD part, despite near-identical benchmark scores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2133 supports quad-channel DDR4 with a theoretical bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U supports dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Xeon has a 66% higher peak bandwidth figure.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in almost every fundamental specification. The Intel Xeon W-2133 uses the Intel Socket 2066 platform, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U uses the AMD Socket FP6. The Xeon has six cores and twelve threads, whereas the Ryzen has four cores and eight threads. Base clocks diverge significantly: the Xeon runs at 3.60 GHz base and 3.90 GHz boost, while the Ryzen runs at 2.30 GHz base and 4.30 GHz boost. The TDP is the most dramatic difference, with the Xeon rated at 140 watts and the Ryzen at just 15 watts.

PCIe connectivity is another major split. The Xeon provides 48 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen provides only 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. Memory bus width also differs: the Xeon uses quad-channel DDR4 with 85.3 GB/s bandwidth, while the Ryzen uses dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The Xeon has no integrated graphics, while the Ryzen includes Radeon Graphics (Vega 6). The Xeon's launch MSRP is $617; the Ryzen has no launch MSRP listed. The Xeon's part number is SR3LL, and the Ryzen's is 100-000000950.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these chips is vast. The Intel Xeon W-2133 is built on Intel's 14 nm process node with a die size of 484 mm². It uses the Skylake architecture (codenamed Skylake-W) and was released on 2017-08-28. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8.25 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U, released on 2023-01-03, uses TSMC's 7 nm process with a die size of 180 mm² and contains 10,700 million transistors. It employs the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Barcelo-R) from the 7000 series. Its cache is 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3.

The Xeon's cache configuration favors per-core capacity, with 1 MB of L2 per core versus the Ryzen's 512 KB. The Xeon's total L3 is slightly larger at 8.25 MB versus 8 MB. The Ryzen's transistor count is explicitly listed at 10,700 million, while the Xeon's is not specified. The foundry difference is notable: Intel for the Xeon, TSMC for the Ryzen. The Xeon is marked as end-of-life, while the Ryzen is active. The Xeon's market segment is Server/Workstation, and the Ryzen's is Mobile. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon W-2133 is the clear winner for workstation and server builds that prioritize platform expansion. Its 48 PCIe Gen 3 lanes are designed for multiple GPUs, NVMe drives, and high-end networking cards. The quad-channel memory bus with 85.3 GB/s bandwidth is a critical advantage for memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads like large database operations or scientific computing. The data shows it wins all Cinebench tests, so it also holds a slight edge in CPU-rendering tasks. Its 140-watt TDP is a non-issue in a full tower workstation with robust cooling, and its $617 launch MSRP reflects its professional positioning.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is the definitive winner for mobile and compact systems. Its 15-watt TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where the Xeon's 140-watt requirement is physically impossible. The integrated Radeon Graphics (Vega 6) provide a display output without a discrete GPU, a feature entirely absent from the Xeon. The Ryzen's 4.30 GHz boost clock delivers single-threaded performance within 0.7% of the Xeon, making it perfectly adequate for everyday productivity. Its active production status and 7 nm process from TSMC ensure long-term availability and efficiency. The dual-channel memory is a limitation, but for a mobile part, the 51.2 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient. The Ryzen wins on efficiency, integration, and platform mobility, while the Xeon wins on raw throughput, I/O capacity, and memory bandwidth.