AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a remarkably consistent pattern across all six Cinebench comparisons: the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 wins every single head-to-head test, but by a very narrow margin. The largest victory for the Intel part comes in Cinebench R15 single-core, where it scores 155 against the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U’s 150, a delta of 3.2%. In every other test, the margin sits at either 2.7% or 2.8%, making this one of the tightest benchmark spreads between two CPUs with such different designs.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Xeon’s 12 cores and 24 threads give it a structural advantage, yet the Ryzen 3 PRO’s 4 cores and 8 threads keep the gap modest. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows the Xeon at 10904 versus 10605 for the AMD part, a 2.7% lead. Cinebench R20 multi-core repeats the pattern: 4579 against 4454, again 2.7%. Cinebench R15 multi-core follows with 1098 versus 1068, also 2.7%. The single-core results are similarly close: Cinebench R20 single-core gives the Intel chip a 646 to 628 win (2.8%), and Cinebench R23 single-core shows 1539 versus 1497 (2.7%).

The average benchmark score in the database places the Xeon E5-2650 v4 at 3154, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U sits at 3063. That is a difference of roughly 3%, which aligns with the head-to-head deltas. The Xeon’s percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database is 53, one point higher than the Ryzen’s 52. In practical terms, the benchmark data indicates that despite a 7-year gap in release dates, the two processors land in essentially the same performance tier.

What makes this interesting is the absolute consistency. The Xeon wins by nearly the same percentage in every test, whether the workload scales across many cores or relies on a single thread. That uniformity suggests the performance difference is not driven by core count or clock speed alone, but by a combination of architectural efficiency and memory subsystem capabilities that slightly favors the Intel design across the board.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head data gives the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 a clean sweep with six wins out of six tests. There is no benchmark category in which the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U comes out ahead. However, the margins are so small that the practical difference in real-world applications would be minimal.

The Xeon’s wins are most pronounced in single-core tests, where it leads by 3.2% in Cinebench R15 and 2.8% in Cinebench R20. This is notable because the Ryzen 3 PRO has a much higher boost clock of 4.30 GHz versus the Xeon’s 2.90 GHz. The fact that the Intel part still wins single-threaded tests suggests its Broadwell architecture delivers more instructions per clock in these specific workloads, despite the massive clock disadvantage.

In multi-core tests, the Xeon’s 12 cores versus 4 cores should theoretically produce a far larger lead, yet the delta remains at 2.7%. This indicates the Ryzen 3 PRO’s Zen 3 architecture is substantially more efficient per core, allowing it to nearly match a processor with three times the core count. The Ryzen’s higher boost clock and modern 7 nm process node help close the gap that raw core counts would otherwise dictate.

For use-case analysis, the database suggests the Xeon is marginally better for sustained multi-threaded rendering and heavy parallel workloads, given its consistent multi-core wins. The Ryzen 3 PRO, despite losing every benchmark, offers comparable performance with a far lower power envelope, which matters in mobile or compact systems. The Xeon’s 105 W TDP versus the Ryzen’s 15 W TDP means the AMD part achieves roughly 97% of the Xeon’s multi-core performance at one-seventh the thermal design power.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is built on Zen 3 architecture with the Barcelo-R codename, part of the 7000 series. It uses a 7 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, packing 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses Broadwell architecture with the Broadwell-EP codename, built on Intel’s 14 nm process with 3,400 million transistors on a 246 mm² die.

Core configurations differ dramatically. The Ryzen 3 PRO has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Xeon has 12 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are close: 2.30 GHz for the AMD part versus 2.20 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks tell a different story, with the Ryzen reaching 4.30 GHz compared to the Xeon’s 2.90 GHz.

Cache hierarchies are also distinct. Both use 64 KB of L1 cache per core, but the Ryzen has 512 KB of L2 per core while the Xeon has 256 KB per core. L3 cache favors the Intel chip substantially: 30 MB shared versus 8 MB shared. This larger L3 cache likely contributes to the Xeon’s ability to stay competitive despite lower clocks.

Memory support shows both support DDR4, but the Ryzen uses a dual-channel memory bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the Xeon uses a quad-channel bus with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor like the Ryzen 3 PRO. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the Ryzen provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the Xeon provides Gen 3 with 40 lanes.

The Ryzen 3 PRO includes integrated Radeon Graphics (Vega 6), while the Xeon has no integrated graphics. The Ryzen targets the mobile market segment and remains in active production, while the Xeon is a server/workstation part that has reached end-of-life status. Release dates are separated by nearly seven years: the Xeon launched in March 2016, and the Ryzen launched in January 2023.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 beat the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U in all benchmarks?

A: Yes, the database records the Xeon winning all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, with margins ranging from 2.7% to 3.2%.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U boosts to 4.30 GHz, significantly higher than the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4’s 2.90 GHz boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 support ECC memory, though the Ryzen uses dual-channel while the Xeon uses quad-channel DDR4.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U includes Radeon Graphics (Vega 6), while the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the production status of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is active in production, while the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 is end-of-life.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 12 |

| Threads | 8 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 105 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP6 | Intel Socket 2011-3 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Broadwell |

| Codename | Barcelo-R | Broadwell-EP |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | 3,400 million |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 246 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Quad-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 68.3 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 40 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics (Vega 6) | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | January 2023 | March 2016 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $1166 |

| Part Number | 100-000000950 | SR2N3 |

The specification table highlights how two processors with nearly identical benchmark scores can be fundamentally different. The Ryzen 3 PRO achieves its performance with a fraction of the power draw, a smaller die, and far fewer transistors, thanks to its modern 7 nm process and higher clock speeds. The Xeon relies on more cores, a larger L3 cache, and wider memory bandwidth to match the AMD part. Neither is unlocked for overclocking, and both support ECC memory. The Ryzen’s integrated graphics give it an advantage in compact systems, while the Xeon’s 40 PCIe lanes and quad-channel memory serve workstation and server workloads.