AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 Comparison

The Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U are separated by nearly a decade of silicon evolution, yet their benchmark averages land within 0.1% of each other. The Xeon’s average score is 3066, while the Ryzen sits at 3063, placing both in the 52nd percentile of all CPUs. This near-parity in aggregate output masks a fundamental split: the Intel part is an 8-core, 16-thread Haswell server chip, while the AMD part is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 3 mobile processor. The data shows a statistical dead heat, with each platform winning exactly three of the six head-to-head tests.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is the exact tie in Cinebench R15. Both the multicore and singlecore scores are identical: 1068 and 150, respectively. The deltaPct is 0 for both, meaning neither chip can claim an edge in this legacy render test. This is a remarkable outcome given the architectural gulf between the two parts.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the results remain extraordinarily close. The Xeon scores 4452 in multicore and 628 in singlecore, while the Ryzen scores 4454 and 628. The deltaPct is again 0 for both tests, though the AMD chip is credited with the multicore win by a margin of two points. The singlecore test is recorded as a win for the Intel part, also with a deltaPct of 0. These are effectively noise-level differences; neither processor demonstrates a measurable advantage in R20.

Cinebench R23 tells a similar story. In the multicore test, the Xeon posts 10601 versus the Ryzen’s 10605, a four-point gap that gives AMD the win with a deltaPct of 0. The singlecore test shows the Ryzen ahead at 1497 versus 1496, a one-point margin with a deltaPct of -0.1. Across all six benchmarks, the largest recorded deltaPct is -0.1, which is within run-to-run variance for any modern benchmark suite.

The head-to-head tally is a clean 3-3 split. The Intel Xeon claims wins in R15 multicore, R15 singlecore, and R20 singlecore, while the AMD Ryzen takes R20 multicore, R23 multicore, and R23 singlecore. The Ryzen also has two additional Geekbench scores in its benchmark list — 4532 multicore and 1573 singlecore — but these are not part of the head-to-head comparison, so they do not affect the win count. The practical takeaway is that in Cinebench workloads, these two processors are functionally interchangeable in output, despite their vastly different designs.

Architecture Differences

The Xeon E5-2618L v3 is built on Intel’s 22 nm Haswell-EP process, with a die size of 356 mm² and 2,600 million transistors. The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U uses TSMC’s 7 nm process, packing 10,700 million transistors into a 180 mm² die. This means the AMD chip crams over four times as many transistors into roughly half the silicon area, a direct consequence of the process node advantage.

Core counts differ sharply: the Xeon has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Xeon’s base clock is 2.30 GHz with a boost of 3.40 GHz, while the Ryzen matches the 2.30 GHz base but boosts to 4.30 GHz. The higher boost clock on the AMD part compensates for its fewer cores in single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

Cache hierarchies are also divergent. Both have 64 KB of L1 per core, but the Xeon’s L2 is 256 KB per core versus 512 KB per core on the Ryzen. The L3 cache is a major differentiator: the Xeon offers 20 MB shared, while the Ryzen has only 8 MB shared. The Xeon’s larger L3 is typical of server parts designed for data-heavy workloads, though the Ryzen’s larger per-core L2 helps reduce latency in mobile scenarios.

Memory support is DDR4 on both, but the bus configurations differ. The Xeon uses quad-channel memory with a peak bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s, while the Ryzen uses dual-channel with 51.2 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile part and indicates the Ryzen PRO’s workstation-oriented positioning. PCIe is Gen 3 on both, but the Xeon provides 40 lanes (CPU only) versus 16 lanes on the Ryzen.

The sockets are incompatible: the Xeon uses Intel Socket 2011-3, while the Ryzen uses AMD Socket FP6. The Xeon is a server/workstation part with a launch MSRP of $779, while the Ryzen is a mobile processor with no launch MSRP listed. The Ryzen also includes integrated Radeon Graphics (Vega 6), whereas the Xeon has no integrated graphics. The Xeon’s TDP is 75 W, compared to 15 W for the Ryzen, reflecting the server chip’s higher power envelope and the mobile chip’s efficiency focus.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 has an average benchmark score of 3066, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U scores 3063, a difference of 0.1% in favor of the Intel part.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U scores 10605 in Cinebench R23 multicore, narrowly edging out the Intel Xeon’s 10601, a deltaPct of 0.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The Intel Xeon has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen has 4 cores and 8 threads. Despite half the cores, the Ryzen matches the Xeon’s multicore performance in Cinebench tests.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U support ECC memory, an uncommon feature for a mobile-class chip.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Intel Xeon provides 59.7 GB/s via quad-channel memory, while the AMD Ryzen provides 51.2 GB/s via dual-channel memory, a 16.6% advantage for the Xeon.

Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U boosts to 4.30 GHz, while the Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 boosts to 3.40 GHz, a 0.90 GHz advantage for the AMD part.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Boost Clock | 3.40 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 75 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 | AMD Socket FP6 |

| Architecture | Haswell | Zen 3 |

| Codename | Haswell-EP | Barcelo-R |

| Process Node | 22 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | 2,600 million | 10,700 million |

| Die Size | 356 mm² | 180 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| PCIe Lanes | 40 (Gen 3) | 16 (Gen 3) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon Graphics (Vega 6) |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2014-09-07 | 2023-01-03 |

| Launch MSRP | $779 | Not listed |

| Part Number | SR200 | 100-000000950 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3 is the choice for server and workstation environments that demand high memory bandwidth. Its quad-channel DDR4 interface delivers 59.7 GB/s, which is 16.6% higher than the Ryzen’s dual-channel 51.2 GB/s. The Xeon also provides 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, enabling more expansion cards, NVMe drives, or GPU accelerators in a single socket. Its 20 MB of shared L3 cache is 2.5 times larger than the Ryzen’s, which can benefit workloads with large working sets that fit within the cache. The 75 W TDP indicates a part intended for sustained multi-threaded loads in a chassis with adequate cooling, and its 8-core/16-thread configuration provides headroom for heavily parallel server tasks. The $779 launch MSRP reflects its enterprise positioning.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U wins on efficiency and single-core responsiveness. Its 15 W TDP is one-fifth of the Xeon’s, making it viable for thin-and-light mobile systems without active cooling or with minimal thermal solutions. The 4.30 GHz boost clock is 0.90 GHz higher than the Xeon’s, giving it a clear edge in bursty, latency-sensitive tasks. Despite half the cores, it matches the Xeon’s multicore scores in Cinebench R20 and R23, proof of the IPC gains from the 7 nm Zen 3 architecture. The integrated Radeon Graphics (Vega 6) eliminates the need for a discrete GPU in basic display and media workloads, which the Xeon cannot do without external hardware. Its 8 MB L3 cache is smaller, but the 512 KB per-core L2 helps mitigate that in single-threaded scenarios.

For users choosing between these two, the decision hinges on platform context rather than raw benchmark scores. The Xeon is a legacy server part with a release date of 2014-09-07, suitable for existing Socket 2011-3 systems or workloads that need ECC memory, quad-channel bandwidth, and many PCIe lanes. The Ryzen, released 2023-01-03, is a modern mobile chip that delivers comparable Cinebench performance at a fraction of the power draw, with the added convenience of integrated graphics. Benchmark results indicate that in pure compute throughput, there is no winner — the 3-3 split in head-to-head wins and the 0.1% average score difference prove that. The real differentiators are memory bandwidth, expansion capability, power consumption, and the presence or absence of integrated graphics.